Comments on: 46.1 MP Canon EOS-3D X To Be Announced Before PhotoPlus ?

By: KasumiY

KasumiY — Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:25:00 +0000

How come Canon rumors are always wrong and Nikon rumors are always right?

By: Gunnar Österlund

Gunnar Österlund — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:29:00 +0000

Have Canon any knowledge of this camera?

By: Muchsin T. Assegaf

Muchsin T. Assegaf — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:12:00 +0000

Cant imagine 46MP with 16bit in 35mm.. Amazing technology!!

By: Thijs Bosma

Thijs Bosma — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:37:00 +0000

Community. =]

By: CharlestonDave

CharlestonDave — Mon, 24 Sep 2012 03:12:00 +0000

I’m betting that the price > the max ISO….ittybitty pixels -> more noise.

By: Jr Miller

Jr Miller — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 20:51:00 +0000

Young Eartha or Old Eartha?

By: Jason Peters

Jason Peters — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:35:00 +0000

There’s no doubt the little sensors kick MF’s ass in some regards

By: stefanhellbergDOTcom

stefanhellbergDOTcom — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:22:00 +0000

very true, and you also get less distortion with an 80mm lens instead of equivalent 50mm for FF. But for some stuff 35mm AF and ISO kicks medium ass. ;)

By: Jason Peters

Jason Peters — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:22:00 +0000

I would expect this body to drop somewhere in the 10k range…

By: Jason Peters

Jason Peters — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 19:17:00 +0000

film or sensor size is still a big deal. No matter how many MP camera manufacturers cram into 35mm size sensors, MF will always have the upper hand on quality because of pixel micron size. I’d much rather shoot a 30mp MF back then a 46mp 35mm… Also the sensor size effects depth of field, hence MF glass being slower (among other reasons).