<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Are Out Of Focus Images Gone For Good?</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Casey Colomb</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-55610</link> <dc:creator>Casey Colomb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-55610</guid> <description><![CDATA[ You&#039;re not allowed to hold on to anything other then the perfect shot! In fact, unless you get commissions, you shouldn&#039;t be holding a camera.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You&#8217;re not allowed to hold on to anything other then the perfect shot! In fact, unless you get commissions, you shouldn&#8217;t be holding a camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: volindsay</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53618</link> <dc:creator>volindsay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53618</guid> <description><![CDATA[thats horrible to think of, but i dont think they just &quot;misfocus, I think they use different patterns to blur. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats horrible to think of, but i dont think they just &#8220;misfocus, I think they use different patterns to blur. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: volindsay</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53617</link> <dc:creator>volindsay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53617</guid> <description><![CDATA[in David&#039;s eyes, yes.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in David&#8217;s eyes, yes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eenoog (one-eye)</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53613</link> <dc:creator>eenoog (one-eye)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53613</guid> <description><![CDATA[Nice.  Relevant: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-sneak-peeks/max-2011-sneak-peek-image-deblurring/PS There&#039;s a mac version of the same program... Works so-so. See: https://github.com/Y-Vladimir/SmartDeblur/blob/master/README.md]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  Relevant: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-sneak-peeks/max-2011-sneak-peek-image-deblurring/</p><p>PS There&#8217;s a mac version of the same program&#8230; Works so-so.<br /> See: <a href="https://github.com/Y-Vladimir/SmartDeblur/blob/master/README.md" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Y-Vladimir/SmartDeblur/blob/master/README.md</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: eenoog (one-eye)</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53612</link> <dc:creator>eenoog (one-eye)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53612</guid> <description><![CDATA[Obviously Google is not a tool in your shed (which isn&#039;t filled with a lot of sharp tools to begin with, or so it seems).  It&#039;s real.  Also, this:  http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-sneak-peeks/max-2011-sneak-peek-image-deblurring/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously Google is not a tool in your shed (which isn&#8217;t filled with a lot of sharp tools to begin with, or so it seems).  It&#8217;s real.  </p><p>Also, this: <br /> <a href="http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-sneak-peeks/max-2011-sneak-peek-image-deblurring/" rel="nofollow">http://tv.adobe.com/watch/max-2011-sneak-peeks/max-2011-sneak-peek-image-deblurring/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Dewberry</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53610</link> <dc:creator>John Dewberry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53610</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lol did anyone notice his profile pic, or his photography logo? Bahaha https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/384534_197029477059842_923292256_n.jpg]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol did anyone notice his profile pic, or his photography logo?<br /> Bahaha https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/384534_197029477059842_923292256_n.jpg</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ann</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53609</link> <dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53609</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sometimes, for family or sentimtal purposes, you might not want to,let it go.  Is that so bad? ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, for family or sentimtal purposes, you might not want to,let it go.  Is that so bad?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Distras</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53608</link> <dc:creator>Mike Distras</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53608</guid> <description><![CDATA[You have to remember this software is a &quot;stepping stone&quot;, and the first one of many no doubt into  fixing out of focus shots. Yes the results might suck a little, but its the first step of many as software and algorithms improve with time.Hopefully nobody would rely on this software for normal day to day work, however some of the other examples show recovery of text from documents or signs - Imagine the usage from a legal point of view, or trying to find out exactly a photos location by a sign in the background.The examples show a an extreme example of &quot;deblurring&quot; too... So the results will look a little crappy - However, from a professional point of view, what if you have a photo from a wedding, or event that is absolutely perfect except that its marginally out of focus! The software itself maybe able to recover it to a point that a client would be happy with!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to remember this software is a &#8220;stepping stone&#8221;, and the first one of many no doubt into  fixing out of focus shots. Yes the results might suck a little, but its the first step of many as software and algorithms improve with time.</p><p>Hopefully nobody would rely on this software for normal day to day work, however some of the other examples show recovery of text from documents or signs &#8211; Imagine the usage from a legal point of view, or trying to find out exactly a photos location by a sign in the background.</p><p>The examples show a an extreme example of &#8220;deblurring&#8221; too&#8230; So the results will look a little crappy &#8211; However, from a professional point of view, what if you have a photo from a wedding, or event that is absolutely perfect except that its marginally out of focus! The software itself maybe able to recover it to a point that a client would be happy with!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nismode</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53607</link> <dc:creator>Nismode</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53607</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think you need to let it go, I think we get your opinion after 5/13 posts saying the same thing lol.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to let it go, I think we get your opinion after 5/13 posts saying the same thing lol.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Crockett</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/are-out-of-focus-images-gone-for-good/comment-page-1#comment-53585</link> <dc:creator>David Crockett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=56994#comment-53585</guid> <description><![CDATA[Plain and simple, the finished product from these &quot;fixed&quot; photos still look like crap. The simplest solution is to check the photo, see if you got it focus and if not, shoot it again! If you can&#039;t, then just let it go! Let it gooooooo... let it gooooooooooooooooooooo...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain and simple, the finished product from these &#8220;fixed&#8221; photos still look like crap. The simplest solution is to check the photo, see if you got it focus and if not, shoot it again! If you can&#8217;t, then just let it go! Let it gooooooo&#8230; let it gooooooooooooooooooooo&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>