<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Blackmagic to Release New Cinema Camera with Passive Micro 4/3 Mount</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/blackmagic-to-release-new-cinema-camera-with-passive-micro-43-mount/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/blackmagic-to-release-new-cinema-camera-with-passive-micro-43-mount</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Roberto Mettifogo</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/blackmagic-to-release-new-cinema-camera-with-passive-micro-43-mount/comment-page-1#comment-49658</link> <dc:creator>Roberto Mettifogo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=49933#comment-49658</guid> <description><![CDATA[the only good reason to have m43 is to use the 7-14mm, the widest wide angle lens available for a camera that needs wide lenses like the BMCC. But how will I control iris with the passive mount ? ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only good reason to have m43 is to use the 7-14mm, the widest wide angle lens available for a camera that needs wide lenses like the BMCC. But how will I control iris with the passive mount ? </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/blackmagic-to-release-new-cinema-camera-with-passive-micro-43-mount/comment-page-1#comment-49619</link> <dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=49933#comment-49619</guid> <description><![CDATA[Nope. Much rather have a Nikon F mount. And maybe a camera that wasn&#039;t so Apple-centric for file transfer, storage and post processing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. Much rather have a Nikon F mount. And maybe a camera that wasn&#8217;t so Apple-centric for file transfer, storage and post processing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erik Tande</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/blackmagic-to-release-new-cinema-camera-with-passive-micro-43-mount/comment-page-1#comment-49585</link> <dc:creator>Erik Tande</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=49933#comment-49585</guid> <description><![CDATA[M4/3 is great because you can easily adapt just about any lens to it.  But without electronic control, they&#039;ve lost the ability to use actual Micro Four Thirds lenses that have electronic aperture and focus by wire.  (Olympus 12mm, 45mm, 75mm, etc)    Strange, strange decision.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M4/3 is great because you can easily adapt just about any lens to it.  But without electronic control, they&#8217;ve lost the ability to use actual Micro Four Thirds lenses that have electronic aperture and focus by wire.  (Olympus 12mm, 45mm, 75mm, etc)    Strange, strange decision.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>