• Originals
    • Categories
      • Gear
        • Forum
          • Picture of the Day
            • Contests
              • More
                • FS Gear Guide
                • Fstoppers T-shirts
              • Home
              • Advertise
              • Meet the Writers
              • Submit Content
              • Contact
              Picture 2
              April 9, 2012
              Amy Hobbs

              [BTS Video] Toronto Maple Leafs Photo Shoot

              Here’s a great behind-the-scenes time lapse video from photographer Finn O’Hara. It’s from a photo shoot he did for the Toronto Maple Leaf hockey team. They set up on the ice and it was an 18-hour production. You’ll see the ginormous maple leaf backdrop, measuring 55 ft by 85 ft. Fantastic work from our neighbors to the north!

              __

              From Amy:

              Thank you so much for reading! You can find me on Facebook or my website. Have a lovely day.

              BTS
              Portraits
              Sports
              Timelapse
              « [Gear] The World’s Strangest Cameras
              [Editorial] Can Sony’s Digital Imaging Division Restore Profits? »
              • http://twitter.com/strobist David Hobby

                Was a very cool shoot. I posted about this in 2009 and Finn spent some time answering Q’s in the comments. (‘Cause he is one of the Good Guys.)

                http://strobist.blogspot.com/2009/11/this-finn-ohara-shoot-probably-will-not.html

              • Satya Varghese Mac

                Thats pretty cool but why didn’t they just composite it?? It would have been much cheaper.

              • ValentinoAntonio

                I don’t understand the “brainlessness” in the arena to do all that work just top get those shots that could’ve been done with minimal props, certainly not at that scale, and lighting . . . . I just can;t stand all this “higher than thou” setup mentality.

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1636695731 Michel Steeze

                Yep, it didn’t make a lot of sense to do all that work if you could have done it so much easier

              • themsquaredgroup

                And I can promise you there was still some retouching done on these. Looks good on your resume when you can say you did something this large with your clients money. The lighting was fantastic, the time lapse sucked so bad I fast forward through it and it was already sped up. I’m thinking the timelapse was part of the package, hence it needing to take a long time and be done without compositing.

              • Michael Battenberg

                and yet they still didn’t male the playoffs…. again  (spoken as a disgruntled Toronto based photographer myself… who didn’t get the gig, LOL) 

                As for doing it cheaper… the Leafs are the richest team in the league, so I guess money was not a real object!

              • http://twitter.com/Seshan Seshan

                Leafs suck. That’s all I have to say.

              • vanderkaay

                Actually, I could answer all your questions.  

                I’m a fellow Toronto photographer who was hired to light the stills portion of that set.
                The reason why it was shot on location was because we were essentially piggy backing a video shoot which required that big setup.   The first 4:32 seconds of that time lapse video, we’re actually watching a crew set up for the video that they were filming.At 4:33, you can see our tiny stills sets in the bottom left hand corner.  We had 3 different sets going, using their backdrops as our backgrounds.Yes, we could have shot the players in studio, but we killed two birds with one stone that day.  The players were there, so we had to be as well. (try getting 35 prima donnas to come out to a 2nd shoot)

                And as far as shooting on location, why not?!  It’s what makes us professional photographers.  Clients need to realize this as we’re constantly trying to justify what we do and the money we charge.

                If any ‘Timmy’ in his basement could photoshop these shots, then we’d all be out of a job.  We have to stand up for our rates and our skill set!!

                If you’re a photographer, and you’re reading this, be sure to push your clients into spending what needs to be spent.  In the end, ‘you get what you pay for’.

                Cheers!

              • vanderkaay

                Actually, I could answer all your questions.  

                I’m a fellow Toronto photographer who was hired to light the stills portion of that set.
                The reason why it was shot on location was because we were essentially piggy backing a video shoot which required that big setup.   The first 4:32 seconds of that time lapse video, we’re actually watching a crew set up for the video that they were filming.At 4:33, you can see our tiny stills sets in the bottom left hand corner.  We had 3 different sets going, using their backdrops as our backgrounds.Yes, we could have shot the players in studio, but we killed two birds with one stone that day.  The players were there, so we had to be as well. (try getting 35 prima donnas to come out to a 2nd shoot)

                And as far as shooting on location, why not?!  It’s what makes us professional photographers.  Clients need to realize this as we’re constantly trying to justify what we do and the money we charge.

                If any ‘Timmy’ in his basement could photoshop these shots, then we’d all be out of a job.  We have to stand up for our rates and our skill set!!

                If you’re a photographer, and you’re reading this, be sure to push your clients into spending what needs to be spent.  In the end, ‘you get what you pay for’.

                Cheers!

              • John_Skinner

                After reading all the comments, it was a little obvious before I hit the bottom this clearly wasn’t going to be for stills alone.. A fairly hefty production budget was allotted for a shoot of this size and still were merely a by-product of this entire setup. I would have liked to see the final video output for the work having gone into this set.

              • Connect with Fstoppers
                Follow @Fstoppers
              • Fstoppers Originals
              • Popular Articles
                • What A Week Of Groceries Looks Like Around The World
                • "Unplugged Weddings": Preventing Guests From Destroying Your Photographs
                • Endearing Animal Portraits By 18 Year Old Photographer Jessica Trinh
                • Color Film Footage From 1920s London is the Coolest Thing You'll See Today
                • Raw Comparison: Magic Lantern Canon 5D VS Black Magic Cinema Camera
                • Is Facebook the New Breeding Ground for Copyright Infringement?
                • Learn Inexpensive Ways To Create Gallery-Style Works Of Art
                • Saudi Arabian Women Unveiled
                • Brad Pitt Photographs Angelina Jolie: Results Are Impressive
                • 3 Minutes Of Setup And 2 Shutter Clicks : The Reality Of Celebrity Portraiture
                • No Joke: Magic Lantern Gets Raw Video Out Of The Canon 5D Mark III
                • Behind the Scenes: Photo Shoot with EXITMUSIC
                • Jeff Bridges Honored for His Photography
                • UPDATED: Is World Press Photo Photoshopped?
              • Recent Comments
                • templebox said Interesting and all, but absolutely nothing about photography in this post! »
                • Dan Tabár said was a pleasure to assist on this shoot - both Blair and Clayton were class acts throughout »
                • MarkFore said As a photographer who works in-house for a fairly large clothing brand I see my images all over the Inter »
                • James Busse said i prefer to watermark as many as i can. its kind of ridiculous but this is the world we're coming to. peo »
                • A.G. Photography said Stop sharing photos, and share links. Share links to your websites. »
                • A.G. Photography said THIS is why copyright infringement is so rampant on Facebook, Google, Pintrest etc: http://commercialphot »
                • Jon Vogt said The depth of field isn't even realistic.... »
                • Jon Wright said I recently asked a FB page what the trick was to have my photos shared on their page. This is the respons »
              • Support Fstoppers
                current nikon rebates deals
              • FS Originals
              • Endearing Animal Portraits By 18 Year Old Photographer Jessica Trinh
              • How to Go Pro Without Going Crazy
              • Fstoppers Sits Down with Lara Jade
              • Fstoppers First Look: Sigma’s New 18-35 f/1.8
              • Fstoppers Reviews SLRLounge’s Natural Light Couples Photography Workshop DVD
              • Categories
              • Commercial
              • Video
              • Gear
              • Location
              • Strobe Light
              • Contests
              • Win a 30x40 Print
              • Alien Skin Retouch Contest
              • Win the Art Behind the Headshot
              • Black Rapid Contest
              • Win a Lowepro Bag
              • Random Posts
              • Canon’s Controversial 24-70mm f/4 Lens Now Available
              • [News] Canon SLRs Used for Stunts and Action in Marvel’s The Avengers
              • [Video] Time Lapse of Aging Children
              • [Photos] Insects Appear Beautiful In Stunning Macro Series
              • [Review] The Brand New Really Right Stuff Pocket Pod
              • Picture of the Day
              • Frankfurt Delay
              • LHD-1
              • Search and Rescue
              • Gallardo
              • Aurora X-Trail
              • Home
              • Advertise
              • Meet the Writers
              • Submit Content
              • Contact
              • Sitemap
              © Fstoppers
              Made by Novum