<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: California Sunbounce: Expensive But Worth It</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/comment-page-1#comment-4335</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:35:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2290#comment-4335</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t spend that much on a reflector.  The one Im using is 40 bucks.  Even maybe Sunbounce is really that good but if I can use something 10 times cheaper but giving 50% of the effect, I wouldn&#039;t buy it unless I got funded by a client or somehow I just get too much money to spend.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t spend that much on a reflector.  The one Im using is 40 bucks.  Even maybe Sunbounce is really that good but if I can use something 10 times cheaper but giving 50% of the effect, I wouldn&#8217;t buy it unless I got funded by a client or somehow I just get too much money to spend.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: george socka</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/comment-page-1#comment-4331</link> <dc:creator>george socka</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:12:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2290#comment-4331</guid> <description><![CDATA[Regardless of the manufacturer, the comment about keeping a reflector in the trunk is great advice. I was supposed to shoot a musician on a beach here in the great white north. Turned into rain so we ended up under a picnic structure. Still bright outside, dark under the roof. I would have given, well a lot, to have a reflector to bring some light into the shadows. Thing is, there always used to be a reflector in the trunk.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the manufacturer, the comment about keeping a reflector in the trunk is great advice. I was supposed to shoot a musician on a beach here in the great white north. Turned into rain so we ended up under a picnic structure. Still bright outside, dark under the roof. I would have given, well a lot, to have a reflector to bring some light into the shadows. Thing is, there always used to be a reflector in the trunk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Frank B</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/comment-page-1#comment-4297</link> <dc:creator>Frank B</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2290#comment-4297</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve worked with California Sunbounce equipment on several shoots and it&#039;s a great product. That said, it&#039;s just too expensive to justify in my operation. I&#039;ll be replacing and upgrading most of my light reflecting gear over the next few months but it would require a Major League sale or price reduction before I could entertain California Sunbounce as my replacement equipment.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve worked with California Sunbounce equipment on several shoots and it&#8217;s a great product. That said, it&#8217;s just too expensive to justify in my operation. I&#8217;ll be replacing and upgrading most of my light reflecting gear over the next few months but it would require a Major League sale or price reduction before I could entertain California Sunbounce as my replacement equipment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: xaltair</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/comment-page-1#comment-4293</link> <dc:creator>xaltair</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2290#comment-4293</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wow, talk about expensive, the 4x6 kits is over $400, and the overhead one is over $800...I can either buy a couple of these or a brand new L lens. They may be amazing at what they do, but two aluminum pipes and some reflective plastic wrap for $300+++ borders on ridiculous.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about expensive, the 4&#215;6 kits is over $400, and the overhead one is over $800&#8230;I can either buy a couple of these or a brand new L lens. They may be amazing at what they do, but two aluminum pipes and some reflective plastic wrap for $300+++ borders on ridiculous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: c.d.embrey</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/california-sunbounce-expensive-but-worth-it/comment-page-1#comment-4292</link> <dc:creator>c.d.embrey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:48:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2290#comment-4292</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yes, I bounce! i don&#039;t leave home without my 4x6 Sun-Bounce Pro. I use it for both stills and video. Hand held outdoors and on a C-stand indoors. Expensive, but worth it!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I bounce! i don&#8217;t leave home without my 4&#215;6 Sun-Bounce Pro. I use it for both stills and video. Hand held outdoors and on a C-stand indoors. Expensive, but worth it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>