<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Canon Goes Small With the New Mirrorless</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ben Mulligan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45892</link> <dc:creator>Ben Mulligan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45892</guid> <description><![CDATA[I dont understand all the whiners wanting a mirrorless, then when it is released you don&#039;t stop hearing about a viewfinder. Sheesh.I love the look of it. I think it has a 2x crop because 22mm would be 44mm ish (about standard lens distance) or i may be wrong :-P]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand all the whiners wanting a mirrorless, then when it is released you don&#8217;t stop hearing about a viewfinder. Sheesh.</p><p>I love the look of it. I think it has a 2x crop because 22mm would be 44mm ish (about standard lens distance) or i may be wrong :-P</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Mulligan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45891</link> <dc:creator>Ben Mulligan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45891</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yeah mate, they are called SLR&#039;s]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah mate, they are called SLR&#8217;s</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Omi Khan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45879</link> <dc:creator>Omi Khan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45879</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was excited after seeing canonrumor&#039;s retro depiction of this camera .. I must say I&#039;m dissapointed at the modern look :(]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited after seeing canonrumor&#8217;s retro depiction of this camera .. I must say I&#8217;m dissapointed at the modern look :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: João de Medeiros</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45828</link> <dc:creator>João de Medeiros</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45828</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;And if the picture is correct, it’s quite a neat little thing — not so bulky as these other ‘semi-pro’ mirrorless offerings&quot;Olympus EPM 1 anyone....even Sigma&#039;s DP1 &amp; 2. Where were you since 2008? Models like that exist already by Panasonic and Olympus.... light, bulky. Amateur or semi-pro, you name it. Canon is way late in this game, four years late, this is not news its more canon following others.http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepm1João]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And if the picture is correct, it’s quite a neat little thing — not so bulky as these other ‘semi-pro’ mirrorless offerings&#8221;</p><p>Olympus EPM 1 anyone&#8230;.even Sigma&#8217;s DP1 &amp; 2.<br /> Where were you since 2008? Models like that exist already by Panasonic and Olympus&#8230;. light, bulky. Amateur or semi-pro, you name it.<br /> Canon is way late in this game, four years late, this is not news its more canon following others.</p><p><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepm1" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepm1</a></p><p>João</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45813</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45813</guid> <description><![CDATA[Those knobs are awesome! Instead of looping a thick fabric through a loop and locking it in as you loop it through another plastic thing a few times, you just snap in or out whenever you want to take the strap off/put it back on (if they make it the right way). I prefer those to anything strap-wise...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those knobs are awesome! Instead of looping a thick fabric through a loop and locking it in as you loop it through another plastic thing a few times, you just snap in or out whenever you want to take the strap off/put it back on (if they make it the right way). I prefer those to anything strap-wise&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NursultanTulyakbay</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45795</link> <dc:creator>NursultanTulyakbay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45795</guid> <description><![CDATA[No &quot;Nikon&quot; label and no full frame sensor.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8220;Nikon&#8221; label and no full frame sensor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45771</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45771</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m excited for this one. I hope it performs well. I&#039;m stoked there&#039;s a hot shoe on this camera and not a pop up flash. A tiny wireless transmitter and a off camera flash, combined with something like Lumniquest XL Softbox in a slim bag, might make a sick combination.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m excited for this one. I hope it performs well. I&#8217;m stoked there&#8217;s a hot shoe on this camera and not a pop up flash. A tiny wireless transmitter and a off camera flash, combined with something like Lumniquest XL Softbox in a slim bag, might make a sick combination.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vinterchaos</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45764</link> <dc:creator>vinterchaos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45764</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ya, you&#039;re looking at Fuji/Leica as far as that goes, and maybe the NEX-7 as a bit of rangefinder feel.. but not really happening it seems.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya, you&#8217;re looking at Fuji/Leica as far as that goes, and maybe the NEX-7 as a bit of rangefinder feel.. but not really happening it seems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Felipe Manga</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45747</link> <dc:creator>Felipe Manga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45747</guid> <description><![CDATA[Apparently not:http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/eosm2.jpg]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently not:</p><p><a href="http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/eosm2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.canonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/eosm2.jpg</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Felipe Manga</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-goes-small-with-the-new-mirrorless/comment-page-1#comment-45746</link> <dc:creator>Felipe Manga</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=42735#comment-45746</guid> <description><![CDATA[It has what seems to be a wheel under the shutter button. That would suggest a pretty Rebel-like control scheme, which isn&#039;t bad.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has what seems to be a wheel under the shutter button. That would suggest a pretty Rebel-like control scheme, which isn&#8217;t bad.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>