<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Canon Posts Test Images Taken With New 24-70mm F/4 and 35mm f/2</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Victor</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55896</link> <dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55896</guid> <description><![CDATA[They look impressive, but only samples for now. I did order a 24-70 f4L because I don&#039;t have this range covered yet and the f2.8L is rather expensive, plus I have a 40 f2.8 and 100 f2.8L already so I will do well with these for now. the contrast looks great and sharpness is as MTF charts suggest. Even Bokeh is looking lovely. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They look impressive, but only samples for now. I did order a 24-70 f4L because I don&#8217;t have this range covered yet and the f2.8L is rather expensive, plus I have a 40 f2.8 and 100 f2.8L already so I will do well with these for now. the contrast looks great and sharpness is as MTF charts suggest. Even Bokeh is looking lovely. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Katinas</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55841</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Katinas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55841</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yeah it makes me suspect that it aint that good on f/2]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it makes me suspect that it aint that good on f/2</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aboufirass Hamza</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55838</link> <dc:creator>Aboufirass Hamza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55838</guid> <description><![CDATA[Images taken in Morocco!! ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Images taken in Morocco!! </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roberto Mettifogo</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55835</link> <dc:creator>Roberto Mettifogo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55835</guid> <description><![CDATA[It would be interesting if in this picture there is lens profile correction applied or noth, I think it&#039;s key to know it.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting if in this picture there is lens profile correction applied or noth, I think it&#8217;s key to know it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pawel Mazurkiewicz</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55833</link> <dc:creator>Pawel Mazurkiewicz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55833</guid> <description><![CDATA[Images taken with 35mm look very nice, but I still think it&#039;s a bit to pricey according to the previous version.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Images taken with 35mm look very nice, but I still think it&#8217;s a bit to pricey according to the previous version.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaron Schneider</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55825</link> <dc:creator>Jaron Schneider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55825</guid> <description><![CDATA[I agree. I sort of expected them to want to show it off at its widest aperture. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I sort of expected them to want to show it off at its widest aperture. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mmmarc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55826</link> <dc:creator>mmmarc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55826</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wish Nikon would update its 35mm f/2 lens.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Nikon would update its 35mm f/2 lens. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/canon-posts-test-images-taken-new-24-70mm-f4-35mm-f2/comment-page-1#comment-55823</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60081#comment-55823</guid> <description><![CDATA[Very sharp images. I would&#039;ve liked to have seen the 35mm shot wide open but it looks very sharp.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sharp images. I would&#8217;ve liked to have seen the 35mm shot wide open but it looks very sharp.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>