<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Capture One Express 7 Announced &#8211; Phase One&#8217;s Affordable Raw Processing Software For Under $100</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nikolay MirchevCreativeMedia</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-69244</link> <dc:creator>Nikolay MirchevCreativeMedia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-69244</guid> <description><![CDATA[I will really appreciate if they make the phase one module a bit more affordable like the capture one software ;) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will really appreciate if they make the phase one module a bit more affordable like the capture one software ;) </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tobias Solem</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68273</link> <dc:creator>Tobias Solem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68273</guid> <description><![CDATA[Also, a comparison (courtesy of Armand Niculescu ) http://www.twin-pixels.com/best-photo-raw-converters/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, a comparison (courtesy of Armand Niculescu ) <a href="http://www.twin-pixels.com/best-photo-raw-converters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.twin-pixels.com/best-photo-raw-converters/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tobias Solem</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68272</link> <dc:creator>Tobias Solem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68272</guid> <description><![CDATA[These type of programs are so much alike we may as well compare a) how stable they are b) the speed of loading/viewing images and c) Their footprint and &quot;bloat&quot; (useless features)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These type of programs are so much alike we may as well compare a) how stable they are b) the speed of loading/viewing images and c) Their footprint and &#8220;bloat&#8221; (useless features)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kenyee</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68221</link> <dc:creator>kenyee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68221</guid> <description><![CDATA[That was my first thought when looking at the feature list last week as well. Second thought was I&#039;d like to see a LR comparison.  LR probably organizes better and has better 3rd party support.  C1 supposedly has better skin tones and moire removal.  But most people have standardized on LR (when Adobe doesn&#039;t shoot themselves in the foot by making it molasses slow :-) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my first thought when looking at the feature list last week as well.<br /> Second thought was I&#8217;d like to see a LR comparison.  LR probably organizes better and has better 3rd party support.  C1 supposedly has better skin tones and moire removal.  But most people have standardized on LR (when Adobe doesn&#8217;t shoot themselves in the foot by making it molasses slow :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Moxley</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68211</link> <dc:creator>James Moxley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68211</guid> <description><![CDATA[+1 For AfterShot Pro]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 For AfterShot Pro</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Tarry</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68177</link> <dc:creator>James Tarry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68177</guid> <description><![CDATA[i was actually going to ask a similar thing i use LR4, but really would like to know if there is a benefit to using this over LR4..... although i could just do the trial and see :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was actually going to ask a similar thing i use LR4, but really would like to know if there is a benefit to using this over LR4&#8230;.. although i could just do the trial and see :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EnticingHavoc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68132</link> <dc:creator>EnticingHavoc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68132</guid> <description><![CDATA[Express Version is complete crap with such severe restrictions. No local adjustments. This feature is absolutely crucial for serious retouching. No spots removal tool. ... Not even for free would I take it. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Express Version is complete crap with such severe restrictions.<br /> No local adjustments. This feature is absolutely crucial for serious retouching.<br /> No spots removal tool.<br /> &#8230;<br /> Not even for free would I take it. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: douglassonders</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68050</link> <dc:creator>douglassonders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68050</guid> <description><![CDATA[youre right and sure thing!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>youre right and sure thing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: douglassonders</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68040</link> <dc:creator>douglassonders</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68040</guid> <description><![CDATA[sure ill see about putting this together]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure ill see about putting this together</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Kobelt</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/capture-one-express-7-announced-phase-ones-affordable-raw-processing-software-for-under-100/comment-page-1#comment-68035</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Kobelt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=73793#comment-68035</guid> <description><![CDATA[Looks like a good option, I&#039;m using AfterShot Pro but Corel take an eternity to add support for new camera models (not that this affects me directly but it gives a poor impression of their support model). Also alot of lens and camera combinations are not supported by AfterShot for distortion/CA/vignetting correction. I had considered version 6 express but it was missing lens corrections, now they&#039;ve added this feature it&#039;s certainly more appealing]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a good option, I&#8217;m using AfterShot Pro but Corel take an eternity to add support for new camera models (not that this affects me directly but it gives a poor impression of their support model). Also alot of lens and camera combinations are not supported by AfterShot for distortion/CA/vignetting correction. I had considered version 6 express but it was missing lens corrections, now they&#8217;ve added this feature it&#8217;s certainly more appealing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>