Comments on: Fuji: Velvia No More http://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more Video Blog for Creative Professionals Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:29:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: GWGhttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45861 GWG Sat, 21 Jul 2012 08:44:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45861 What a shame! Despite all those filter desperately trying to recreate the look, nothing comes close! Guess films shooters will just have to shoot more/start petitions to convince companies to at least keep small production lines going – the impossible project shows it is possible – maybe it’s just yet again a matter of big companies being unable to scale down to smaller production runs properly…

]]>
By: Destin Sparkshttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45857 Destin Sparks Sat, 21 Jul 2012 05:55:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45857 I shoot 120 velvia 50 exclusively. This is not a good sign. Velvia is by far some of the best looking photos you will ever see. http://www.facebook.com/destinsparks has some on there and when my site launches in a couple of weeks. http://www.destinsparks.com

]]>
By: Barry Johnsonhttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45778 Barry Johnson Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:15:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45778 I foresee E-6 dropping off bit by bit in the next two years, sad. Very hard to get color saturation like that with negative films.

]]>
By: ajmillshttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45717 ajmills Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:38:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45717 Velvia was my favourite film and even though I no longer shoot film, I would be sad to see it go.

Perhaps I’ll dig out one of my film cameras and run a couple of rolls through it.

]]>
By: Jens Hamadahttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45711 Jens Hamada Fri, 20 Jul 2012 08:48:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45711 does not bother me. it´s obsolet anyway and i don´t shoot film anymore… since 8 years.

 

]]>
By: Adamhttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45689 Adam Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:12:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45689 Yeah. 100F is the ‘older’ one, but replaced Velvia 50 when it was still just called plain “Velvia” prior to ’05. They then re-released it as the full Velvia 50, but kept the 100s. Now the F is really obsolete. People didn’t like it as much because it wasn’t as saturated, even if it had better skin tones. That’s why I like 100 — it has great skin tones and is still VERY saturated in daylight. And that’ll still be around…for now…

]]>
By: Romanhttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45687 Roman Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:05:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45687 I didn’t shoot slides (yet) but I think there was old Velvia100F and new Velvia100(no F). The new one supposedly was design to fix issues with it predecessor. Is Velvia100 discontinued as well?

]]>
By: Bert McLendonhttp://fstoppers.com/fuji-velvia-no-more/comment-page-1#comment-45683 Bert McLendon Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:19:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=42687#comment-45683 Boo!  can’t they keep a small plant and maybe partner with Kodak just to keep a small run of these print films going?  c’mon!!!  Sure they can’t keep their gigantic plants going to justify the costs, but a small plant??

]]>