<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Gear] 2.5K Resolution For Under $3000!</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: wtiy</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38586</link> <dc:creator>wtiy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38586</guid> <description><![CDATA[Oh man, why would you make a camera for the &#039;pro&#039; market and not have a PL mount on it?Also, @facebook-100000008811871:disqus, even in studio you&#039;d want to avoid relying on AC power, to avoid line-hum noise during a recording. I haven&#039;t yet had this issues with cameras (have been using DC power for cameras mostly), but I have definitely experienced line-hum with AC-powered audio recorders.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, why would you make a camera for the &#8216;pro&#8217; market and not have a PL mount on it?</p><p>Also, @facebook-100000008811871:disqus,<br /> even in studio you&#8217;d want to avoid relying on AC power, to avoid<br /> line-hum noise during a recording. I haven&#8217;t yet had this issues with<br /> cameras (have been using DC power for cameras mostly), but I have<br /> definitely experienced line-hum with AC-powered audio recorders.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 11071952</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38102</link> <dc:creator>11071952</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38102</guid> <description><![CDATA[If it would have PL-mount it would be useable in professional market. You could use fex. Zeiss Ultra Primes in super 16 format. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it would have PL-mount it would be useable in professional market. You could use fex. Zeiss Ultra Primes in super 16 format. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Louis Rafael Rosenthal</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38095</link> <dc:creator>Louis Rafael Rosenthal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38095</guid> <description><![CDATA[I guess it&#039;s just too shameful to post, here are all the other specs though:http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/blackmagiccinemacamera/techspecs/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s just too shameful to post, here are all the other specs though:</p><p><a href="http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/blackmagiccinemacamera/techspecs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackmagic-design.com/products/blackmagiccinemacamera/techspecs/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joshua Needham</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38086</link> <dc:creator>Joshua Needham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38086</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll tell you what is crap is Vimeo!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what is crap is Vimeo!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dennis Stamatoiu</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38052</link> <dc:creator>Dennis Stamatoiu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38052</guid> <description><![CDATA[To the OP. 90 mins of battery life while in use is amazing. The Red Epic battery life is about half. The one problem I see is the battery on this isn&#039;t replaceable.But you can plug it in AC power while in studio. Also, the ssd slot is a great addition. Yes, the Red camera use ssd but I spent alot of money on SSD&#039;s from Red. You can&#039;t buy off the shelf hard drives. I think the sensor is good enough for most people. Yes the ISO noise isn&#039;t the best compared to Red, Arri, or some of the DSLR. You need to keep in mind that film was pre release. The Nikon D4 had to have a new firmware update before it was release which helped with the ISO so there is a chance it will get better.I would love to try it out. I would put it through its paces. Ill have to call Black Magic and see what I can do.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the OP. 90 mins of battery life while in use is amazing. The Red Epic battery life is about half. The one problem I see is the battery on this isn&#8217;t replaceable.But you can plug it in AC power while in studio. Also, the ssd slot is a great addition. Yes, the Red camera use ssd but I spent alot of money on SSD&#8217;s from Red. You can&#8217;t buy off the shelf hard drives. </p><p>I think the sensor is good enough for most people. Yes the ISO noise isn&#8217;t the best compared to Red, Arri, or some of the DSLR. You need to keep in mind that film was pre release. The Nikon D4 had to have a new firmware update before it was release which helped with the ISO so there is a chance it will get better.</p><p>I would love to try it out. I would put it through its paces. Ill have to call Black Magic and see what I can do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nevada Soel</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38046</link> <dc:creator>Nevada Soel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38046</guid> <description><![CDATA[I still can&#039;t find the how much the Native ISO    ? ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t find the how much the Native ISO    ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kathie Turner Jones</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38029</link> <dc:creator>Kathie Turner Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38029</guid> <description><![CDATA[The sensor size is really what determines the image clarity, sharpness, etc. as well as the glass. On a quick look it is interesting, but when I saw the sensor size they lost my interest. :/  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sensor size is really what determines the image clarity, sharpness, etc. as well as the glass. On a quick look it is interesting, but when I saw the sensor size they lost my interest. :/ </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cristian Troncoso</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38013</link> <dc:creator>Cristian Troncoso</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38013</guid> <description><![CDATA[mmm blurry :( ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmm blurry :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tobias Solem</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38009</link> <dc:creator>Tobias Solem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38009</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;2.5K&quot; isn&#039;t that impressive, 1080p by that standard would be &quot;1.92K&quot;, smaller sensor has limited use, and looking at the footage I&#039;m not impressed. I actually prefer the performance of the DSLR&#039;s. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;2.5K&#8221; isn&#8217;t that impressive, 1080p by that standard would be &#8220;1.92K&#8221;, smaller sensor has limited use, and looking at the footage I&#8217;m not impressed. I actually prefer the performance of the DSLR&#8217;s. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ry</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-2-5k-resolution-for-under-3000/comment-page-1#comment-38001</link> <dc:creator>ry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=33026#comment-38001</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve got to agree with Scott.  There is a ton of noise in the sample video in the link at ISO 320.  Generally the downsampling of Vimeo tends to mask quite a bit of noise (it&#039;s only displaying 720p).  Even at much, much higher ISOs, GH2 or 5D footage shows much less noise on Vimeo.  I can only imagine how much noise is visible in the native 2.5K resolution footage.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to agree with Scott.  There is a ton of noise in the sample video in the link at ISO 320.  Generally the downsampling of Vimeo tends to mask quite a bit of noise (it&#8217;s only displaying 720p).  Even at much, much higher ISOs, GH2 or 5D footage shows much less noise on Vimeo.  I can only imagine how much noise is visible in the native 2.5K resolution footage.  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>