<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Gear] Great New Stabilization System For iPhone, GoPro And DSLR</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Corey Melton</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32313</link> <dc:creator>Corey Melton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32313</guid> <description><![CDATA[noted]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noted</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Meloy</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32281</link> <dc:creator>John Meloy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32281</guid> <description><![CDATA[Looks like a nice enough product for the money, but I have some serious concerns about getting it properly balanced.  Watching the footage it&#039;s pretty clear that the dynamic balance isn&#039;t very precise and there is a lot of input required to keep the camera pointing at the subject and semi-level.  Most of the footage tends to pitch and yaw likely due to its &#039;quick balance&#039; methodology that forgoes the required precision and calculations to achieve dynamic balance.  Basically it&#039;s a Merlin copy but without the precision and arc measurement control that allows for more perfect balance.  The reason any steadicam takes so long to balance is because there are very specific calculations, precise measurements, and exact weights required to get it right.  It&#039;s the same for any steadicam type system.  There is no getting around physics and static balance is not the same thing as dynamic balance.In any case, don&#039;t be fooled that this stabilizer is a &#039;quick balance&#039; system unlike the others.  It&#039;s not.  It requires either a lot of luck or very precise measurement and weights processed through a calculation to get things just right.  If only it were as easy as it&#039;s made out to be.With all that being said, it looks like a great system for the money.  But its &#039;quick setup&#039; methodology and skipping over the required calculations means that it will be harder to fly with the same level of control and precision as other more advanced systems.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a nice enough product for the money, but I have some serious concerns about getting it properly balanced.  Watching the footage it&#8217;s pretty clear that the dynamic balance isn&#8217;t very precise and there is a lot of input required to keep the camera pointing at the subject and semi-level.  Most of the footage tends to pitch and yaw likely due to its &#8216;quick balance&#8217; methodology that forgoes the required precision and calculations to achieve dynamic balance.  Basically it&#8217;s a Merlin copy but without the precision and arc measurement control that allows for more perfect balance.  The reason any steadicam takes so long to balance is because there are very specific calculations, precise measurements, and exact weights required to get it right.  It&#8217;s the same for any steadicam type system.  There is no getting around physics and static balance is not the same thing as dynamic balance.</p><p>In any case, don&#8217;t be fooled that this stabilizer is a &#8216;quick balance&#8217; system unlike the others.  It&#8217;s not.  It requires either a lot of luck or very precise measurement and weights processed through a calculation to get things just right.  If only it were as easy as it&#8217;s made out to be.</p><p>With all that being said, it looks like a great system for the money.  But its &#8216;quick setup&#8217; methodology and skipping over the required calculations means that it will be harder to fly with the same level of control and precision as other more advanced systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Meloy</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32282</link> <dc:creator>John Meloy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32282</guid> <description><![CDATA[Looks like a nice enough product for the money, but I have some serious concerns about getting it properly balanced.  Watching the footage it&#039;s pretty clear that the dynamic balance isn&#039;t very precise and there is a lot of input required to keep the camera pointing at the subject and semi-level.  Most of the footage tends to pitch and yaw likely due to its &#039;quick balance&#039; methodology that forgoes the required precision and calculations to achieve dynamic balance.  Basically it&#039;s a Merlin copy but without the precision and arc measurement control that allows for more perfect balance.  The reason any steadicam takes so long to balance is because there are very specific calculations, precise measurements, and exact weights required to get it right.  It&#039;s the same for any steadicam type system.  There is no getting around physics and static balance is not the same thing as dynamic balance.In any case, don&#039;t be fooled that this stabilizer is a &#039;quick balance&#039; system unlike the others.  It&#039;s not.  It requires either a lot of luck or very precise measurement and weights processed through a calculation to get things just right.  If only it were as easy as it&#039;s made out to be.With all that being said, it looks like a great system for the money.  But its &#039;quick setup&#039; methodology and skipping over the required calculations means that it will be harder to fly with the same level of control and precision as other more advanced systems.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a nice enough product for the money, but I have some serious concerns about getting it properly balanced.  Watching the footage it&#8217;s pretty clear that the dynamic balance isn&#8217;t very precise and there is a lot of input required to keep the camera pointing at the subject and semi-level.  Most of the footage tends to pitch and yaw likely due to its &#8216;quick balance&#8217; methodology that forgoes the required precision and calculations to achieve dynamic balance.  Basically it&#8217;s a Merlin copy but without the precision and arc measurement control that allows for more perfect balance.  The reason any steadicam takes so long to balance is because there are very specific calculations, precise measurements, and exact weights required to get it right.  It&#8217;s the same for any steadicam type system.  There is no getting around physics and static balance is not the same thing as dynamic balance.</p><p>In any case, don&#8217;t be fooled that this stabilizer is a &#8216;quick balance&#8217; system unlike the others.  It&#8217;s not.  It requires either a lot of luck or very precise measurement and weights processed through a calculation to get things just right.  If only it were as easy as it&#8217;s made out to be.</p><p>With all that being said, it looks like a great system for the money.  But its &#8216;quick setup&#8217; methodology and skipping over the required calculations means that it will be harder to fly with the same level of control and precision as other more advanced systems.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harun Butt</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32249</link> <dc:creator>Harun Butt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32249</guid> <description><![CDATA[Costs $325 if you didn&#039;t get it on kickstarter.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Costs $325 if you didn&#8217;t get it on kickstarter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Hart</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32243</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Hart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32243</guid> <description><![CDATA[Julio, are you using a full-frame camera? If not you&#039;ll have no problem. I&#039;ve used that lens on my 60D. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julio, are you using a full-frame camera? If not you&#8217;ll have no problem. I&#8217;ve used that lens on my 60D. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Hart</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32242</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Hart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32242</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi Jaron, I definitely think you&#039;ll have to hold it to get an appreciation for how tough it is. Maybe we&#039;ll do some testing to show what kind of abuse it can handle. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jaron, I definitely think you&#8217;ll have to hold it to get an appreciation for how tough it is. Maybe we&#8217;ll do some testing to show what kind of abuse it can handle. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Hart</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32241</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Hart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32241</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hey guys, thanks for the post Corey. If you&#039;re interested in picking one up you can head over to www.rhinocg.com since the Kickstarter campaign is over. We&#039;re looking at shipping dates in late February for non-kickstarter backers. I totally understand your concerns but I wanted to give my $.02 so I replied to some of them comments. Hope that&#039;s OK. If any of you have any specific questions you can e-mail me at sales@rhinocameragear.com. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys, thanks for the post Corey. If you&#8217;re interested in picking one up you can head over to <a href="http://www.rhinocg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rhinocg.com</a> since the Kickstarter campaign is over. We&#8217;re looking at shipping dates in late February for non-kickstarter backers. I totally understand your concerns but I wanted to give my $.02 so I replied to some of them comments. Hope that&#8217;s OK. If any of you have any specific questions you can e-mail me at <a href="mailto:sales@rhinocameragear.com">sales@rhinocameragear.com</a>. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eduardo Merille</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32205</link> <dc:creator>Eduardo Merille</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32205</guid> <description><![CDATA[that manfrotto someone posted is useless. just FYI]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that manfrotto someone posted is useless. just FYI</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yilkee Lam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32199</link> <dc:creator>Yilkee Lam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32199</guid> <description><![CDATA[Not sure how much it weighs but looks lighter then the flycam 5000. Also, the grip is not of to the side so if I was in the market for a steadycam i&#039;d be looking at this too.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how much it weighs but looks lighter then the flycam 5000. Also, the grip is not of to the side so if I was in the market for a steadycam i&#8217;d be looking at this too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yilkee Lam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-great-new-stabilization-system-for-iphone-gopro-and-dslr/comment-page-1#comment-32200</link> <dc:creator>Yilkee Lam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=20573#comment-32200</guid> <description><![CDATA[Not sure how much it weighs but looks lighter then the flycam 5000. Also, the grip is not of to the side so if I was in the market for a steadycam i&#039;d be looking at this too.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how much it weighs but looks lighter then the flycam 5000. Also, the grip is not of to the side so if I was in the market for a steadycam i&#8217;d be looking at this too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>