<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Gear] The Most Exciting Gear Week in a While</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: j.j.</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33649</link> <dc:creator>j.j.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33649</guid> <description><![CDATA[I still have my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 without the VR she-bang, i would like to try that 25mm f/.95 on a nikon.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have my Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 without the VR she-bang, i would like to try that 25mm f/.95 on a nikon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Ottke</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33603</link> <dc:creator>Adam Ottke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33603</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks! Read it the wrong way somewhere else...got me confused :-)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! Read it the wrong way somewhere else&#8230;got me confused :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Ottke</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33601</link> <dc:creator>Adam Ottke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33601</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was thinking about that! We all love that range. Who doesn&#039;t love his 24-70? And why has it taken this long to add some sort of image stabilization to one of those at 2.8 (unless I missed a lens)?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about that! We all love that range. Who doesn&#8217;t love his 24-70? And why has it taken this long to add some sort of image stabilization to one of those at 2.8 (unless I missed a lens)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Ottke</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33600</link> <dc:creator>Adam Ottke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33600</guid> <description><![CDATA[No more than Sigma was with its pricing &#039;magic...&#039;  :-)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more than Sigma was with its pricing &#8216;magic&#8230;&#8217;  :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Ottke</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33599</link> <dc:creator>Adam Ottke</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33599</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not skeptical at all. I think it&#039;s a great format that suits a ton of people. We should just remember that it&#039;s not an APS-C size, let alone full frame. Tech from companies like Fuji and Foveon/Sigma are creating better sensors in smaller sizes than we&#039;ve ever seen. It&#039;s quite wonderful to see.As for mirrorless cameras in general (which are often confused with micro four-thirds cameras mostly because a lot of the first mirrorless cameras used micro four-thirds sensors, and vice versa), I think it&#039;s great, too. We don&#039;t get the wonderful non-digital EVF, but again, companies like Fuji with their hybrid viewfinders are making those better than ever. Still, I feel like a select few are gimmicky and that we need to remain conscious (for whom it may concern) of this fact. That said, there are many &#039;pro&#039; cameras coming out that fit into this category and that I believe will perform superbly, out-doing all expectations (Fuji X-Pro 1 and quite possibly the new Olympus as well, perhaps among others).Hope that helps clear up my view. :-)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not skeptical at all. I think it&#8217;s a great format that suits a ton of people. We should just remember that it&#8217;s not an APS-C size, let alone full frame. Tech from companies like Fuji and Foveon/Sigma are creating better sensors in smaller sizes than we&#8217;ve ever seen. It&#8217;s quite wonderful to see.</p><p>As for mirrorless cameras in general (which are often confused with micro four-thirds cameras mostly because a lot of the first mirrorless cameras used micro four-thirds sensors, and vice versa), I think it&#8217;s great, too. We don&#8217;t get the wonderful non-digital EVF, but again, companies like Fuji with their hybrid viewfinders are making those better than ever. Still, I feel like a select few are gimmicky and that we need to remain conscious (for whom it may concern) of this fact. That said, there are many &#8216;pro&#8217; cameras coming out that fit into this category and that I believe will perform superbly, out-doing all expectations (Fuji X-Pro 1 and quite possibly the new Olympus as well, perhaps among others).</p><p>Hope that helps clear up my view. :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick Hall</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33555</link> <dc:creator>Patrick Hall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33555</guid> <description><![CDATA[Might have to get that Tamron 24-70 to go with my D4.  Might be the next Fstoppers goto lens!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might have to get that Tamron 24-70 to go with my D4.  Might be the next Fstoppers goto lens!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: janne aavasalo</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33549</link> <dc:creator>janne aavasalo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33549</guid> <description><![CDATA[With Sigma news you might want to correct the name from Fovian to Foveon...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Sigma news you might want to correct the name from Fovian to Foveon&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vladimir byazrov</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33545</link> <dc:creator>vladimir byazrov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33545</guid> <description><![CDATA[In Sigma SD1 segment you lost your shit completely, man. What an abracadabra is your writing there? )]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Sigma SD1 segment you lost your shit completely, man. What an abracadabra is your writing there? )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geir</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/gear-the-most-exciting-gear-week-in-a-while/comment-page-1#comment-33539</link> <dc:creator>Geir</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23357#comment-33539</guid> <description><![CDATA[You seem a bit skeptical to the microfourthirds, as if isn&#039;t a proper camera. Is that a correct interpretation, and in case, why?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem a bit skeptical to the microfourthirds, as if isn&#8217;t a proper camera. Is that a correct interpretation, and in case, why?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>