<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Inspiring Photography By Mahmoud Hiepo</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tony Guillaro</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56597</link> <dc:creator>Tony Guillaro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56597</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think these are very well shot and give you the sense of awe]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these are very well shot and give you the sense of awe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Felipe_Paredes</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56552</link> <dc:creator>Felipe_Paredes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56552</guid> <description><![CDATA[the same, i stop reading fs because of all this dicks]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the same, i stop reading fs because of all this dicks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Douglas Bain</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56463</link> <dc:creator>Douglas Bain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56463</guid> <description><![CDATA[I also love when people try and define &quot;art&quot;, as if there&#039;s a quantitative value which can be placed upon the idea of it. If we set aside the advertising market and the &quot;industry&quot; in general, what are we left with where filming is concerned? The act of capturing a moment. The &quot;art&quot; as it were, may simply exist as a means to express a moment in time, whether it be through an emotional attachment to an object or person or to tell a story, or maybe just to evoke a response? There are a ton more explanations I&#039;m sure, but hoping you guys agree on a surface level, at least.I totally understand not wanting to see yet another coffee mug/bokeh shot, as these certainly are standard fare within the Instagram circles, and do agree that if such shots were omitted, the portfolio might seem stronger indeed. But a lot of them would need to be cut *for me to enjoy*. The only one that speaks to me is the moody dark office with the beam of light and ironically, cup of steaming coffee. (20th shot down from the top) Though it still comes off as a product shot, mostly. That said, to each their own. So long as someone else gets something out of another persons work, I think that matters the most. Life is too short to not enjoy that which makes you truly happy. Who cares if what you like isn&#039;t part of the popular opinion club of the month? Screw that.Doug]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also love when people try and define &#8220;art&#8221;, as if there&#8217;s a quantitative value which can be placed upon the idea of it. If we set aside the advertising market and the &#8220;industry&#8221; in general, what are we left with where filming is concerned? The act of capturing a moment. The &#8220;art&#8221; as it were, may simply exist as a means to express a moment in time, whether it be through an emotional attachment to an object or person or to tell a story, or maybe just to evoke a response? There are a ton more explanations I&#8217;m sure, but hoping you guys agree on a surface level, at least.</p><p>I totally understand not wanting to see yet another coffee mug/bokeh shot, as these certainly are standard fare within the Instagram circles, and do agree that if such shots were omitted, the portfolio might seem stronger indeed. But a lot of them would need to be cut *for me to enjoy*. The only one that speaks to me is the moody dark office with the beam of light and ironically, cup of steaming coffee. (20th shot down from the top) Though it still comes off as a product shot, mostly. That said, to each their own. So long as someone else gets something out of another persons work, I think that matters the most. Life is too short to not enjoy that which makes you truly happy. Who cares if what you like isn&#8217;t part of the popular opinion club of the month? Screw that.</p><p>Doug</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Cross</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56445</link> <dc:creator>Adam Cross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56445</guid> <description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t phone photos count? you&#039;ve taken a photograph with a device that has a sensor and a lens - you&#039;ve then processed that image in a piece of software that has filter presets (just like Lighroom) - but for some reason because it&#039;s a phone that means they don&#039;t count?...well, alright then. you&#039;re obviously right.And, It&#039;s not about the actual subject of the photograph - the bush is irrelevant - this shows your complete lack of understanding. You look at something and say &quot;this sucks&quot; and then you walk away - how wonderful it must be to be you.I would LOVE to know what it is about your own photographs that you think are, somehow, so much better than this guys?Your ego is quite astounding - such a shame that you don&#039;t have the images to back that ego up. I would pay money to see you attempt to outshoot this guy with your phone.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t phone photos count? you&#8217;ve taken a photograph with a device that has a sensor and a lens &#8211; you&#8217;ve then processed that image in a piece of software that has filter presets (just like Lighroom) &#8211; but for some reason because it&#8217;s a phone that means they don&#8217;t count?&#8230;well, alright then. you&#8217;re obviously right.</p><p>And, It&#8217;s not about the actual subject of the photograph &#8211; the bush is irrelevant - this shows your complete lack of understanding. You look at something and say &#8220;this sucks&#8221; and then you walk away &#8211; how wonderful it must be to be you.</p><p>I would LOVE to know what it is about your own photographs that you think are, somehow, so much better than this guys?</p><p>Your ego is quite astounding &#8211; such a shame that you don&#8217;t have the images to back that ego up. </p><p>I would pay money to see you attempt to outshoot this guy with your phone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mmmarc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56442</link> <dc:creator>mmmarc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56442</guid> <description><![CDATA[No, dumbass. Smartphone photos with filters don&#039;t count--and even then I can outshoot this guy on my iPhone. And no one buys anything on Instacanvas.You think taking a stupid picture of a bush and then processing the shit out of it is good photography? Haha. I can&#039;t help you.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, dumbass. Smartphone photos with filters don&#8217;t count&#8211;and even then I can outshoot this guy on my iPhone. And no one buys anything on Instacanvas.</p><p>You think taking a stupid picture of a bush and then processing the shit out of it is good photography? Haha. I can&#8217;t help you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Cross</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56441</link> <dc:creator>Adam Cross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56441</guid> <description><![CDATA[So you&#039;re not counting all the instagram photos you&#039;ve taken which you even have for sale on Instacanv.as ? I&#039;m pretty sure those presets you&#039;ve used on your phone incorporate  split tones, desaturation, vignettes etc. but you&#039;re a serious photographer (obviously) so I guess you don&#039;t count your phone photographs as &quot;real&quot; photography (even though you&#039;re trying to sell it)If I were to give you some creative criticism it would be to not make ignorant remarks on others work when you&#039;re clearly quite an amateur yourself (with an even worse amateur attitude)Neither of you have made particularly original photographs - but what is original these days? I, for one, will happily accept that what I shoot isn&#039;t original or ground breaking in any way but just saying something &quot;sucks&quot; isn&#039;t particularly intelligent. It just shows how ignorant and close-minded your opinion of photography is.His images are creative - he obviously has a clear vision of what he wants to do before he shoots - which is excellent. I wish I could be more like that. Do I want to create the same images? no - but I can appreciate his creative process and would definitely attempt to recreate some of the tones in his photographs, though with my own subjects.Do I look at your photographs and see anything that inspires me - not really. But then again - I don&#039;t have to. But I can happily say that your photos don&#039;t &quot;suck&quot; - I may not like them or draw any inspiration from them whatsoever but I&#039;m sure they don&#039;t &quot;suck&quot; - your photographs just aren&#039;t to my particular taste - not even your street/documentary style stuff.It goes the same for music, art etc - just because it may not be to your taste - doesn&#039;t mean it &quot;sucks&quot;. All that does is belittle anyone&#039;s creativity down a single, statutory insult which is of no benefit to anyone whatsoever.There&#039;s a way to look at photographs and criticise without being a complete ignoramus. But I&#039;m sure you&#039;re never going to change your attitude so I may have wasted my time. oh well.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re not counting all the instagram photos you&#8217;ve taken which you even have for sale on Instacanv.as ? I&#8217;m pretty sure those presets you&#8217;ve used on your phone incorporate  split tones, desaturation, vignettes etc. but you&#8217;re a serious photographer (obviously) so I guess you don&#8217;t count your phone photographs as &#8220;real&#8221; photography (even though you&#8217;re trying to sell it)</p><p>If I were to give you some creative criticism it would be to not make ignorant remarks on others work when you&#8217;re clearly quite an amateur yourself (with an even worse amateur attitude)</p><p>Neither of you have made particularly original photographs &#8211; but what is original these days? I, for one, will happily accept that what I shoot isn&#8217;t original or ground breaking in any way but just saying something &#8220;sucks&#8221; isn&#8217;t particularly intelligent. It just shows how ignorant and close-minded your opinion of photography is.</p><p>His images are creative &#8211; he obviously has a clear vision of what he wants to do before he shoots &#8211; which is excellent. I wish I could be more like that. Do I want to create the same images? no &#8211; but I can appreciate his creative process and would definitely attempt to recreate some of the tones in his photographs, though with my own subjects.</p><p>Do I look at your photographs and see anything that inspires me &#8211; not really. But then again &#8211; I don&#8217;t have to. But I can happily say that your photos don&#8217;t &#8220;suck&#8221; &#8211; I may not like them or draw any inspiration from them whatsoever but I&#8217;m sure they don&#8217;t &#8220;suck&#8221; &#8211; your photographs just aren&#8217;t to my particular taste &#8211; not even your street/documentary style stuff.</p><p>It goes the same for music, art etc &#8211; just because it may not be to your taste &#8211; doesn&#8217;t mean it &#8220;sucks&#8221;. All that does is belittle anyone&#8217;s creativity down a single, statutory insult which is of no benefit to anyone whatsoever.</p><p>There&#8217;s a way to look at photographs and criticise without being a complete ignoramus. But I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re never going to change your attitude so I may have wasted my time. oh well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mmmarc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56438</link> <dc:creator>mmmarc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56438</guid> <description><![CDATA[My photography doesn&#039;t incorporate any of this horse-shit fake vintage crap and these played-out techniques. The reason I know this is because manipulating images the way these were done is as easy as slapping on Lightroom presets onto the images. This work is crap.What&#039;s hilarious is that these comments always attack the haters as being jealous. If the photos were actually good, maybe I would be jealous. Ever think of the idea that maybe the photos here just plain suck? What a thought!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My photography doesn&#8217;t incorporate any of this horse-shit fake vintage crap and these played-out techniques. The reason I know this is because manipulating images the way these were done is as easy as slapping on Lightroom presets onto the images. This work is crap.</p><p>What&#8217;s hilarious is that these comments always attack the haters as being jealous. If the photos were actually good, maybe I would be jealous. Ever think of the idea that maybe the photos here just plain suck? What a thought!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Cross</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56437</link> <dc:creator>Adam Cross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56437</guid> <description><![CDATA[and I suppose being a regular, elitist hater is particularly original, too ? The fact that most of your own photography incorporates many of the same techniques is quite baffling - are you jealous that he&#039;s maybe better at manipulating his photographs than you are? - i&#039;m sure that has nothing to do with it at all.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I suppose being a regular, elitist hater is particularly original, too ? The fact that most of your own photography incorporates many of the same techniques is quite baffling &#8211; are you jealous that he&#8217;s maybe better at manipulating his photographs than you are? &#8211; i&#8217;m sure that has nothing to do with it at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted Gore</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56419</link> <dc:creator>Ted Gore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56419</guid> <description><![CDATA[yeah, I thought that one was particularly smart! Great photo. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I thought that one was particularly smart! Great photo. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted Gore</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/inspiring-photography-mahmoud-hiepo/comment-page-1#comment-56418</link> <dc:creator>Ted Gore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=60605#comment-56418</guid> <description><![CDATA[agreed Andre. Jens and mmmarc, go away. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed Andre. </p><p>Jens and mmmarc, go away. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>