Comments on: [Just Fake It] New Photoshop CS6 Automates Shallow Depth Of Field

By: Vincent Hofer

Vincent Hofer — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:58:00 +0000

And well, working as a reporter, what will you do when you will have to show your original raw, uneddited files? Laughs will be herad for sure!

By: Vincent Hofer

Vincent Hofer — Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:57:00 +0000

nor a 85 1.2 L…

By: President_Putin

President_Putin — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:09:00 +0000

Too fake for me. A good fast Canon lens will create a much better bokeh.

By: Barry Glassman

Barry Glassman — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:29:00 +0000

I agree that this result seems like a poor-man’s fast lens; and I love the comment about a $700 program, but you are missing something significant. This feature is trying compete with the vast amount of programs that allow us pro-sumers to easily create these effects. Nik, OnOne and the like have had a niche of making these edits far more simple. With more and more coming to market PS had to bend toward the ease of these applications.

By: SEAN SHIMMEL

SEAN SHIMMEL — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:24:00 +0000

Never, ever thought I’d say it but… some of Photoshop’s turning into a goofy embarrassment.

For the first time, the coolness factor of endlessly new features is starting to backfire, while honest, clean simplicity and vision are beginning to triumph.

By: Nyaj Timautes Yaaj

Nyaj Timautes Yaaj — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:31:00 +0000

i think i would have to agree with some of the first few post. this looks fake! unless adobe decides to improve its kinda useless. and being a fan of blur and bokeh through the lens…i can definitely tell its a fake blur. and i think i speak for most of us here that we can tell just by looking at the picture. Its not as smooth as it would be if it were blurred through a really fast lens.

By: David Nguyen

David Nguyen — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:33:00 +0000

mother of god

- forget it i quit this game

davidnguyenstudio.com

By: Reev

Reev — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:39:00 +0000

Picasa (FREE) has this feature. Though not as control-intensive, it gets the job done. Been there for more than 5 years now I think.

By: jorge pastrana

jorge pastrana — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:45:00 +0000

50mm 1.8 munch cheaper than photoshop, and more FUN!!

By: jorge pastrana

jorge pastrana — Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:44:00 +0000

FAIL!!!!!!!!! no photoshop can substitute a 50mm 1.8