Comments on: Landscape Photography In the Studio

By: Satya Varghese Mac

Satya Varghese Mac — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:14:00 +0000

It does bother me a bit but I think it’s more where the focal point is on some of them.
Maybe they could have been at f4 instead of f0,95 or whatever they were shot at so the transitions weren’t so harsh. overall I love the idea and there are some great shots in here!

By: Pratik Naik

Pratik Naik — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 04:12:00 +0000

Wow these are fantastic!

By: Joey B

Joey B — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:26:00 +0000

I actually think they’re beautifully done. Shows a lot more creativity than most people put out these days.

By: Gareth Bogdanoff

Gareth Bogdanoff — Sat, 30 Jun 2012 23:18:00 +0000

Cool idea, but the shallow DOF gives me a headache.

By: Michael Wessel

Michael Wessel — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:11:00 +0000

Interesting idea, that’s for sure. I love the thought process that brings people to go, ‘I can’t go there so I’ll make it here.’

By: Lorenzo Gaborini

Lorenzo Gaborini — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:06:00 +0000

Another booooring tilt-shift landscape gallery. Oh, wait…

By: Philip Aarseth

Philip Aarseth — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 21:40:00 +0000

I actually agree with Adam here. On most of the photos I would say that a super shallow DOF is done beautifully, but some of them I would like to see just a little bit more detail. Not a lot, but just a little bit.

By: SEAN SHIMMEL

SEAN SHIMMEL — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:50:00 +0000

I agree. It works beautifully.

The shallowness creates the “magical realism” of it all. The fun surprise of the double take.

By: Kenn Tam

Kenn Tam — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:41:00 +0000

You’re kidding right? Without the super shallow DOF these would just look like piles of lint and crumbs. It’s impossible to make these objects look like landscapes otherwise.

By: Matt Skalski

Matt Skalski — Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:22:00 +0000

Meh