<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Leaked Images Show  Viewfinder-less New Fujifilm X-E1</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Louis Rafael Rosenthal</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48182</link> <dc:creator>Louis Rafael Rosenthal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48182</guid> <description><![CDATA[I really like the &quot;(Edited by author)&quot; on that comment :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the &#8220;(Edited by author)&#8221; on that comment :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Thacker</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48175</link> <dc:creator>Mike Thacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48175</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yes it could be better on the first pass. However, this is near immediate news from the industry. I don&#039;t want it spending any time on the editors desk. Doing so wouldn&#039;t improve my gained knowledge of &quot;Fuji made an EVF X Pro 1&quot;. The professionalism this site brings in other ways, namely the BTS look into working professionals and their projects, has had a side effect of replacing DPReview.com as my source for industry news.Given a choice I want my FStoppers faster not better.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it could be better on the first pass. However, this is near immediate news from the industry. I don&#8217;t want it spending any time on the editors desk. Doing so wouldn&#8217;t improve my gained knowledge of &#8220;Fuji made an EVF X Pro 1&#8243;. The professionalism this site brings in other ways, namely the BTS look into working professionals and their projects, has had a side effect of replacing DPReview.com as my source for industry news.</p><p>Given a choice I want my FStoppers faster not better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: marcus newey</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48103</link> <dc:creator>marcus newey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48103</guid> <description><![CDATA[+1 Blatantly bloody obvious that there&#039;s and EVF there.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1<br /> Blatantly bloody obvious that there&#8217;s and EVF there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48071</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48071</guid> <description><![CDATA[I see a slight hump behind the Fuji logo which looks like an eye cup to me, so maybe it has an EVF.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a slight hump behind the Fuji logo which looks like an eye cup to me, so maybe it has an EVF.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaron Schneider</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48053</link> <dc:creator>Jaron Schneider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48053</guid> <description><![CDATA[Though I am not sure I agree with the tone of what you&#039;ve said, I do agree that beginners or intermediates are the target audience. There are more of them than pros, and they have more money. Money is the driver. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I am not sure I agree with the tone of what you&#8217;ve said, I do agree that beginners or intermediates are the target audience. There are more of them than pros, and they have more money. Money is the driver. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Boys</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48052</link> <dc:creator>Ian Boys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48052</guid> <description><![CDATA[&quot;You may not be one of them, but Fujifilm’s retro-style mirrorless cameras are &quot; - We may not be cameras?&quot;a third Fujifilm camera called the X-E1&quot;  - no, it&#039;s the first with that name and the fourth of the X-series cameras.&quot;due to its lack of viewfinder.&quot; - it clearly does have a viewfinder (EVF). Can&#039;t you see it?&quot;a kind of pop-up flash&quot; = a pop-up flash.&quot;is likely to have a high potential for low-cost machine&quot; - Could you not be bothered to edit the google translation bot?Shoddy, shoddy work.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You may not be one of them, but Fujifilm’s retro-style mirrorless cameras are &#8221; &#8211; We may not be cameras?</p><p>&#8220;a third Fujifilm camera called the X-E1&#8243;  &#8211; no, it&#8217;s the first with that name and the fourth of the X-series cameras.</p><p>&#8220;due to its lack of viewfinder.&#8221; &#8211; it clearly does have a viewfinder (EVF). Can&#8217;t you see it?</p><p>&#8220;a kind of pop-up flash&#8221; = a pop-up flash.</p><p>&#8220;is likely to have a high potential for low-cost machine&#8221; &#8211; Could you not be bothered to edit the google translation bot?</p><p>Shoddy, shoddy work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gary Martin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/leaked-images-show-viewfinder-less-new-fujifilm-x-e1/comment-page-1#comment-48048</link> <dc:creator>Gary Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=47667#comment-48048</guid> <description><![CDATA[Why so many viewfinder less camera&#039;s in the world today.. A viewfinder is so much nicer to look through than just having a screen on the back. This is why I will never buy one of these type cameras. They want professionals and amateurs alike to use them but they really mean just beginners. Beginners don&#039;t care about viewfinders. Professionals do.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why so many viewfinder less camera&#8217;s in the world today.. A viewfinder is so much nicer to look through than just having a screen on the back. This is why I will never buy one of these type cameras. They want professionals and amateurs alike to use them but they really mean just beginners. Beginners don&#8217;t care about viewfinders. Professionals do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>