<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Lexar Announces New XQD and 256GB SDXC Cards</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/lexar-announces-new-xqd-256gb-sdxc-cards/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/lexar-announces-new-xqd-256gb-sdxc-cards</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: OnevFoto</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lexar-announces-new-xqd-256gb-sdxc-cards/comment-page-1#comment-61201</link> <dc:creator>OnevFoto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66374#comment-61201</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is good news. Can&#039;t wait for a thunderbolt based XQD card reader, however I may be waiting a long time for that to come to fruition. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news. Can&#8217;t wait for a thunderbolt based XQD card reader, however I may be waiting a long time for that to come to fruition. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lexar-announces-new-xqd-256gb-sdxc-cards/comment-page-1#comment-61132</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66374#comment-61132</guid> <description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t mean my comment about the write speed in a negative way, per se. But that goes to my point. I&#039;m sure it&#039;s more than what anyone needs anyway, but why can&#039;t Lexar post that? Seems silly, that&#039;s all. But yes, it&#039;s exciting to see the format taking off and not falling flat...we&#039;ll see as more cameras (hopefully) adopt the format.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean my comment about the write speed in a negative way, per se. But that goes to my point. I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s more than what anyone needs anyway, but why can&#8217;t Lexar post that? Seems silly, that&#8217;s all. But yes, it&#8217;s exciting to see the format taking off and not falling flat&#8230;we&#8217;ll see as more cameras (hopefully) adopt the format.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ilo photo</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lexar-announces-new-xqd-256gb-sdxc-cards/comment-page-1#comment-61113</link> <dc:creator>ilo photo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66374#comment-61113</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hallelujah! was getting scared there that the format (and one slot in my D4) was dead. Good to know it&#039;s still very viable. Sidenote: the read and write speeds on my Sony 16gb XQD are very impressive and I&#039;ve had zero issues in terms of reliability with it (only have 1 XQD card currently).]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallelujah! was getting scared there that the format (and one slot in my D4) was dead. Good to know it&#8217;s still very viable. Sidenote: the read and write speeds on my Sony 16gb XQD are very impressive and I&#8217;ve had zero issues in terms of reliability with it (only have 1 XQD card currently).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>