<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Lightroom 4.3 Update Now Available</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: B L</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58418</link> <dc:creator>B L</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58418</guid> <description><![CDATA[For me too it&#039;s really very slow. The slowest is the library module, where it takes forever to zoom in and display 100% : it&#039;s faster in the develop module.  Generating 1:1 previews is not an option in my workflow, it just takes forever. And my Mac is as fast as can be : last generation, fastest i7 CPU, updated system, SSD, filled with RAM etc.  Now it&#039;s Aperture that wins the crown, by far ! But only in terms of speed. Too bad... Anyway, I now edit / select in Nikon View NX, which is absolutely instantaneous (to display the control JPGs of the raw files) - so no need to wait for a single second, even for my D800E files - then each pic gets its stars (or not), etc. Sooooo much faster than editing in LR. I now only use LR to develop and tweak the RAW files + export, once they have been selected in VNX. When wil they (Adobe) produce a real &quot;performance&quot; update ?  Come on guys !!! PLEASE !!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me too it&#8217;s really very slow. The slowest is the library module, where it takes forever to zoom in and display 100% : it&#8217;s faster in the develop module. <br /> Generating 1:1 previews is not an option in my workflow, it just takes forever. And my Mac is as fast as can be : last generation, fastest i7 CPU, updated system, SSD, filled with RAM etc. <br /> Now it&#8217;s Aperture that wins the crown, by far ! But only in terms of speed. Too bad&#8230;<br /> Anyway, I now edit / select in Nikon View NX, which is absolutely instantaneous (to display the control JPGs of the raw files) &#8211; so no need to wait for a single second, even for my D800E files &#8211; then each pic gets its stars (or not), etc. Sooooo much faster than editing in LR. I now only use LR to develop and tweak the RAW files + export, once they have been selected in VNX.<br /> When wil they (Adobe) produce a real &#8220;performance&#8221; update ? <br /> Come on guys !!! PLEASE !!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58375</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58375</guid> <description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t get all the comments about it being sluggish. I&#039;m running on a 27&quot; i5 iMac and have close to zero issues. I&#039;ve had it slow down here and there but thats only if theres a ton of other stuff going on in the background outside of LR.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get all the comments about it being sluggish. I&#8217;m running on a 27&#8243; i5 iMac and have close to zero issues. I&#8217;ve had it slow down here and there but thats only if theres a ton of other stuff going on in the background outside of LR.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chad Andreo-Photo</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58319</link> <dc:creator>Chad Andreo-Photo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58319</guid> <description><![CDATA[LR4 is sluggish compared to LR3 and Photo Mechanics. I have a pretty powerful setup which can run premiere pro, after effects and encore at the same time with no issues, but yet still I dread opening LR. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LR4 is sluggish compared to LR3 and Photo Mechanics. I have a pretty powerful setup which can run premiere pro, after effects and encore at the same time with no issues, but yet still I dread opening LR. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad Curfman</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58257</link> <dc:creator>Brad Curfman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58257</guid> <description><![CDATA[One of the 4.x updates did speed up the performance for me, but it is still slower than it should be.One trick I learned is to browse photos in the Library module, as it renders them faster than in the develop module. Then switch to develop if you need to modify the photo. If you use the keyboard shortcuts to switch modules  (G for library, D for develop), then you can do this pretty quickly.Rendering 1:1 photos does help, but it is still slower when switching photos in develop, than in library. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the 4.x updates did speed up the performance for me, but it is still slower than it should be.</p><p>One trick I learned is to browse photos in the Library module, as it renders them faster than in the develop module. Then switch to develop if you need to modify the photo. If you use the keyboard shortcuts to switch modules  (G for library, D for develop), then you can do this pretty quickly.</p><p>Rendering 1:1 photos does help, but it is still slower when switching photos in develop, than in library. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tobias Solem</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58254</link> <dc:creator>Tobias Solem</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58254</guid> <description><![CDATA[Meh, no PNG-support.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, no PNG-support.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leethecam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58251</link> <dc:creator>leethecam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58251</guid> <description><![CDATA[Tethered capture still fails when my 5D3 is switched off and then back on - just like 4.2Currently the only way to work smoothly is with EOS Utility in this respect.  Why does Adobe think they have fixed this?LEE ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tethered capture still fails when my 5D3 is switched off and then back on &#8211; just like 4.2</p><p>Currently the only way to work smoothly is with EOS Utility in this respect.  Why does Adobe think they have fixed this?</p><p>LEE</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gabe Zermeno</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58209</link> <dc:creator>Gabe Zermeno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58209</guid> <description><![CDATA[I dont think that is adobe&#039;s fault. its nikon.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think that is adobe&#8217;s fault. its nikon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: J Dreier</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58205</link> <dc:creator>J Dreier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58205</guid> <description><![CDATA[Still no support for tethering the D600. C&#039;mon Adobe, C&#039;mon]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still no support for tethering the D600. C&#8217;mon Adobe, C&#8217;mon</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robisierra</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58196</link> <dc:creator>Robisierra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58196</guid> <description><![CDATA[Agreed, same here. And I do have a strong pc that smoothly renders HD video and multiple layers in Photoshop, but Lightroom doesent work for me so smooth. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, same here. And I do have a strong pc that smoothly renders HD video and multiple layers in Photoshop, but Lightroom doesent work for me so smooth. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roman</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/lightroom-4-3-update-now-available/comment-page-1#comment-58189</link> <dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=63373#comment-58189</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Well... upgrading system should not be only solutions if LR3 worked good. In my case I don&#039;t have any problems working on very large files with multiple layers in PS6 but adjusting exposure in LR4 takes 3seconds for each slider movement. LR3 was a good product but I jumped to fast with upgrading. Just wasted my money.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Well&#8230; upgrading system should not be only solutions if LR3 worked good. In my case I don&#8217;t have any problems working on very large files with multiple layers in PS6 but adjusting exposure in LR4 takes 3seconds for each slider movement.<br /> LR3 was a good product but I jumped to fast with upgrading. Just wasted my money.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>