Comments on: Megan Fox In Underwear, Armani Underwear http://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear Video Blog for Creative Professionals Fri, 24 May 2013 05:27:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: billybobtexashttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-64088 billybobtexas Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:52:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-64088 the result is awesome but having here blinky while the fabric is flowing over her is a tad silly hehe.

]]> By: kaja12http://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-53559 kaja12 Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:54:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-53559 great body.. ugly tattoos.. i don´t get why some woman ruin their look with tattoos.

]]> By: Spencer Flohrhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-47075 Spencer Flohr Thu, 09 Aug 2012 21:26:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-47075 In all honesty, I found that your BTS video, [Alex], was better than the actually ad itself. It’s not to say that they ad was bad, not at all. However, it lacked that….”exquisiteness” that I would expect from an Armani campaign.
I think that they should have used your video, or some of the footage at least, in the ad itself. (Mainly the shoot itself though, perhaps leave out most of the H&M clips as well as the set construction)
The composition and feel or your BTS video surpassed that of the final ad’s cut. I hate to say it but the final ad felt slightly amateur (slightly) to me at certain points. Whereas your video, however, was fluid and engaging. I felt more artistic appeal from your video than I did with the final cut.
Bravo, sir. Bravo.

Cheers mate,
Spencer

]]> By: Qashrul Hidafihttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-46508 Qashrul Hidafi Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:58:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-46508 Very inspiring! I love how the translucent cloth floats over her face. 

]]> By: Moses Senquiz Fueledmaghttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-32349 Moses Senquiz Fueledmag Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:49:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-32349 Wow this was awesome

]]> By: Goliathhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-20042 Goliath Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:06:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-20042 What a smurf you are.

]]> By: Viktor Kalabinhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-19656 Viktor Kalabin Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:02:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-19656 Excellent result!

]]> By: Alex Amengualhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-19648 Alex Amengual Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:30:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-19648 Hey Guys – I shot that BTS film and I assure you it was the most stressful I have ever done in my 8 years, and the most complex edit ever too due to the number of revisions and approvals it had to have to reach the point you see it at. Nadal was a great guy to work with and much easier and enjoyable process throughout, and like Eli says – he’s plenty easy on many eyes that I’ve shown it to ;-)

]]> By: Eli Larinhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-19212 Eli Larin Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:22:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-19212 “I was going to post a video showing Rafael Nadal’s latest Armani underwear shoot but figured Megan Fox might be a little easier on the eyes.” Easier for who’s eyes? This comment makes it sound like you’re assuming that your audience is all heterosexual males.

]]> By: Eli Larinhttp://fstoppers.com/megan-fox-in-underwear-armani-underwear/comment-page-1#comment-19213 Eli Larin Thu, 07 Apr 2011 13:22:00 +0000 http://fstoppers.com/?p=5987#comment-19213 “I was going to post a video showing Rafael Nadal’s latest Armani underwear shoot but figured Megan Fox might be a little easier on the eyes.” Easier for who’s eyes? This comment makes it sound like you’re assuming that your audience is all heterosexual males.

]]>