<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [News] Canon Cinema EOS 1D, C100, and C500 Coming Soon?</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: louisleblanc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon/comment-page-1#comment-37726</link> <dc:creator>louisleblanc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=32376#comment-37726</guid> <description><![CDATA[Agreed. I think there&#039;s a demand for a camera that&#039;s made primarily for video, EF mount that doesn&#039;t cost 15k. IE a camera for everyone that bought the 5D mkII (and other canon SLRs) just for video. People doing video for web (web series, music videos), aspiring and hobby film makers and schools. That&#039;s the market that got Canon into video the way it is now and the one they don&#039;t have a camera for. The C300, C500 and 1D C is overkill for that market. The 5D mkIII is not that camera either. It&#039;s still a photo camera first that can be used to do video. Can you make it work? Sure. Though it&#039;s not convenient as it could be. That camera just might be the C100 if it does exist.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I think there&#8217;s a demand for a camera that&#8217;s made primarily for video, EF mount that doesn&#8217;t cost 15k. IE a camera for everyone that bought the 5D mkII (and other canon SLRs) just for video. People doing video for web (web series, music videos), aspiring and hobby film makers and schools. That&#8217;s the market that got Canon into video the way it is now and the one they don&#8217;t have a camera for. </p><p>The C300, C500 and 1D C is overkill for that market. The 5D mkIII is not that camera either. It&#8217;s still a photo camera first that can be used to do video. Can you make it work? Sure. Though it&#8217;s not convenient as it could be. That camera just might be the C100 if it does exist.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Robertson</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon/comment-page-1#comment-37681</link> <dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=32376#comment-37681</guid> <description><![CDATA[They made these to compete with the lower end RED line, they didn&#039;t miss any balls (I think you meant to say dropped the ball or missed the mark?) Their low budget filmmaker camera is the 5D, and the many accessories and add ons available to create an amazing film setup, and there&#039;s tons of amazing work being produced by these setups.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They made these to compete with the lower end RED line, they didn&#8217;t miss any balls (I think you meant to say dropped the ball or missed the mark?) Their low budget filmmaker camera is the 5D, and the many accessories and add ons available to create an amazing film setup, and there&#8217;s tons of amazing work being produced by these setups.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Malley</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon/comment-page-1#comment-37655</link> <dc:creator>Chris Malley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=32376#comment-37655</guid> <description><![CDATA[If i&#039;m honest they&#039;ve hit the nail on the head. They&#039;re called &#039;Cinema&#039; cameras for a reason, people working with production houses or have active budgets to buy and shoot with such things. Most people are likely to rent one instead of purchasing to use on their movies.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i&#8217;m honest they&#8217;ve hit the nail on the head. They&#8217;re called &#8216;Cinema&#8217; cameras for a reason, people working with production houses or have active budgets to buy and shoot with such things. Most people are likely to rent one instead of purchasing to use on their movies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BDWT</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canon-cinema-eos-1d-c100-and-c500-coming-soon/comment-page-1#comment-37629</link> <dc:creator>BDWT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=32376#comment-37629</guid> <description><![CDATA[I still think Canon missed the ball this year. I was really looking forward to these cameras (the C line and all the DSLR revisions) I was hoping that they would make a &quot;real&quot; videocamera with interchangeable lenses that would fit into their 4000-8000$ price range but instead they&#039;ve made a line that is out of reach for most low budget filmmakers. Falling somewhere between the Sony FS line and the RED market, Canon is trying to fill a niche that I don&#039;t think really exists. If I was working on a film with the budget for it, I&#039;d rather shoot on RED than a Canon, and if I didn&#039;t have the funds then the Sony(fs) or Panasonic(af) camera&#039;s sound much more appealing than a 10,000 1D or a revamped 5Dm3 that needs sharpening in post. What the hell is going on..?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think Canon missed the ball this year. I was really looking forward to these cameras (the C line and all the DSLR revisions) I was hoping that they would make a &#8220;real&#8221; videocamera with interchangeable lenses that would fit into their 4000-8000$ price range but instead they&#8217;ve made a line that is out of reach for most low budget filmmakers. Falling somewhere between the Sony FS line and the RED market, Canon is trying to fill a niche that I don&#8217;t think really exists. If I was working on a film with the budget for it, I&#8217;d rather shoot on RED than a Canon, and if I didn&#8217;t have the funds then the Sony(fs) or Panasonic(af) camera&#8217;s sound much more appealing than a 10,000 1D or a revamped 5Dm3 that needs sharpening in post. What the hell is going on..?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>