<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [News] Canon&#8217;s 5D Mark III:  First Pics in the Wild</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Steve Wampler</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34782</link> <dc:creator>Steve Wampler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34782</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m no expert, and I&#039;m bummed to say because I want one, but it appears that the images were photoshopped:http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=fe4554f21c0172f3624628f9a22a956c30a17e91.115239 http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=f3e614a269feca7f8e30e3345a1d931da7b949d2.13084 http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=4eadf6f47969fd7f3ff4c162b9819a3b11bcc1dc.50616Hopefully those links will work. If not, just put the image&#039;s URL into fotoforensics.com and you&#039;ll see the areas of the image that appear to have been modified.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no expert, and I&#8217;m bummed to say because I want one, but it appears that the images were photoshopped:</p><p><a href="http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=fe4554f21c0172f3624628f9a22a956c30a17e91.115239" rel="nofollow">http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=fe4554f21c0172f3624628f9a22a956c30a17e91.115239</a><br /> <a href="http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=f3e614a269feca7f8e30e3345a1d931da7b949d2.13084" rel="nofollow">http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=f3e614a269feca7f8e30e3345a1d931da7b949d2.13084</a><br /> <a href="http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=4eadf6f47969fd7f3ff4c162b9819a3b11bcc1dc.50616" rel="nofollow">http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=4eadf6f47969fd7f3ff4c162b9819a3b11bcc1dc.50616</a></p><p>Hopefully those links will work. If not, just put the image&#8217;s URL into fotoforensics.com and you&#8217;ll see the areas of the image that appear to have been modified.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kurtphillip</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34705</link> <dc:creator>kurtphillip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34705</guid> <description><![CDATA[Continued, from previous post, ( re: articulated LCD ). I was always taught that the larger pixels gather light better than smaller ones. Wouldn&#039;t 12-18 MP be more effective than 21-38 MP&#039;s? Assuming the same size sensor. ( F/F-- 24 X 36 MM ). The Nikon 38 MP seems like severe overkill ! ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continued, from previous post, ( re: articulated LCD ). I was always taught that the larger pixels gather light better than smaller ones. Wouldn&#8217;t 12-18 MP be more effective than 21-38 MP&#8217;s? Assuming the same size sensor. ( F/F&#8211; 24 X 36 MM ). The Nikon 38 MP seems like severe overkill !</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kurtphillip</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34703</link> <dc:creator>kurtphillip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34703</guid> <description><![CDATA[I really wish they would put in a articulated LCD. I&#039;ve used one for several years now, and find it REALLY useful &amp; allowing more creative compositions. Not every shot is best at eye level. Subsequently, I don&#039;t want to get down on my stomach, or knees to get a shot that all you otherts are to lazy to get. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wish they would put in a articulated LCD. I&#8217;ve used one for several years now, and find it REALLY useful &amp; allowing more creative compositions. Not every shot is best at eye level. Subsequently, I don&#8217;t want to get down on my stomach, or knees to get a shot that all you otherts are to lazy to get.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stevealderphoto</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34692</link> <dc:creator>stevealderphoto</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34692</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have to admit that the last couple of  &quot;upgrades&quot; from Canon have been a bit disappointing. Does it have touch screen auto focus? If not then scrolling through 61 focus points is going to be too slow. I mostly do portraits so manual works better most of the time. Here&#039;s hoping the market is flooded with some nice, used 5D MKII&#039;s so I can upgrade from my 50D.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit that the last couple of  &#8221;upgrades&#8221; from Canon have been a bit disappointing. Does it have touch screen auto focus? If not then scrolling through 61 focus points is going to be too slow. I mostly do portraits so manual works better most of the time. Here&#8217;s hoping the market is flooded with some nice, used 5D MKII&#8217;s so I can upgrade from my 50D.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephan Vereno</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34690</link> <dc:creator>Stephan Vereno</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34690</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Haha! Mine is on 2nd too. Hope the rumours come true and the price for the MKII drops abit. :-) Happy birthday!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Haha! Mine is on 2nd too. Hope the rumours come true and the price for the MKII drops abit. :-)<br /> Happy birthday!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefan Đaković</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34689</link> <dc:creator>Stefan Đaković</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34689</guid> <description><![CDATA[both are :) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both are :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Henry Orth</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34662</link> <dc:creator>Henry Orth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34662</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well the high ISO alone for me will justify the 1DX (wedding photography) and of course I love the 5D Mk II so a can&#039;t wait to for the Mk III.  Will relegate the Mk II and the 7D as backups and BTS video.  Not to forget that the 1.6 crip on the 7D will still come in handy for certain situations.Oh - can&#039;t wait for the new flashes!!!  Next couple of months will be fun, funny thing my birthday is March 2 - happy birthday to me from Cannon.  Now if I could just get them to send me something for free!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the high ISO alone for me will justify the 1DX (wedding photography) and of course I love the 5D Mk II so a can&#8217;t wait to for the Mk III.  Will relegate the Mk II and the 7D as backups and BTS video.  Not to forget that the 1.6 crip on the 7D will still come in handy for certain situations.</p><p>Oh &#8211; can&#8217;t wait for the new flashes!!!  Next couple of months will be fun, funny thing my birthday is March 2 &#8211; happy birthday to me from Cannon.  Now if I could just get them to send me something for free!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danylobobyk</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34649</link> <dc:creator>danylobobyk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34649</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Nyaj, your right on on the transmitter. that what make me upgrage in a sec. on the plus side, if they will use CF+SD, you can tether using Eye-Fi cards. but ideally it would be nice to have a transmitter that doesn&#039;t cost 700$-800$ more like now]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Nyaj, your right on on the transmitter. that what make me upgrage in a sec. on the plus side, if they will use CF+SD, you can tether using Eye-Fi cards. but ideally it would be nice to have a transmitter that doesn&#8217;t cost 700$-800$ more like now</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danylobobyk</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34648</link> <dc:creator>danylobobyk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34648</guid> <description><![CDATA[as you said, the big plus with 1DX is speed 14fps vs 5-6fps on 5D - thats a make or break for sports]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as you said, the big plus with 1DX is speed 14fps vs 5-6fps on 5D &#8211; thats a make or break for sports</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas Gonzalez</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-canons-5d-mark-iii-first-pics-in-the-wild/comment-page-1#comment-34642</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas Gonzalez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=26205#comment-34642</guid> <description><![CDATA[Finally the Mark 3. But man, the price hikes these days! Almost $2,500 for the new 24-70 zoom? And then $3,000 for the Mark 3? I don&#039;t recall the Mark 2 starting at 3 grand. And does my complaining about it make me less of a pro? All of my gear has been paid by my work and I refuse to get in more debt than I already am just so I can look and (and possibly feel) more professional than the next. Ok, the Gear Gas passed; I&#039;m better now.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally the Mark 3. But man, the price hikes these days! Almost $2,500 for the new 24-70 zoom? And then $3,000 for the Mark 3? I don&#8217;t recall the Mark 2 starting at 3 grand. And does my complaining about it make me less of a pro? All of my gear has been paid by my work and I refuse to get in more debt than I already am just so I can look and (and possibly feel) more professional than the next. </p><p>Ok, the Gear Gas passed; I&#8217;m better now. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>