<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [News] The New Nikon D800 Might Actually Look Like This</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: brother7</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-32388</link> <dc:creator>brother7</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-32388</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have a question re: anti-aliasing filters... If there are 2 versions, one with AA filter and one without, which would you buy? For those who choose the one without (which will be more expensive), at what price differential would you say &quot;this is too expensive. Just gimme the one with an AA filter&quot;?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question re: anti-aliasing filters&#8230;<br /> If there are 2 versions, one with AA filter and one without, which would you buy?<br /> For those who choose the one without (which will be more expensive), at what price differential would you say &#8220;this is too expensive. Just gimme the one with an AA filter&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob Luckins</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29853</link> <dc:creator>Rob Luckins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29853</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any! I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any!<br /> I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob Luckins</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29854</link> <dc:creator>Rob Luckins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29854</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any! I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any!<br /> I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob Luckins</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29855</link> <dc:creator>Rob Luckins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29855</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any! I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any!<br /> I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob Luckins</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29856</link> <dc:creator>Rob Luckins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29856</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any! I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see that Nikon would put face recognition on a dslr of this level if any!<br /> I would love a faster frame rate though somewhere near 8 or 9 fps. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Barron Skurril Von Snickerspan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29577</link> <dc:creator>Barron Skurril Von Snickerspan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29577</guid> <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s what the d3s is for mate.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what the d3s is for mate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon McGuffin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29570</link> <dc:creator>Jon McGuffin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29570</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yes, video is the &quot;killer-app&quot; that this full frame camera needs, however rumor also has it that this cam is going to be costing in the neighborhood of $4K.  At that price, one could purchase a brand new D700 @ $2600 + D7000 @ $1200 and still be ahead of the price of the D800 body alone.  Worthwhile considering having nearly the best of both worlds... ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, video is the &#8220;killer-app&#8221; that this full frame camera needs, however rumor also has it that this cam is going to be costing in the neighborhood of $4K.  At that price, one could purchase a brand new D700 @ $2600 + D7000 @ $1200 and still be ahead of the price of the D800 body alone.  Worthwhile considering having nearly the best of both worlds&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee Morris</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29527</link> <dc:creator>Lee Morris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29527</guid> <description><![CDATA[video :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>video :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: a. tnb</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29525</link> <dc:creator>a. tnb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29525</guid> <description><![CDATA[Just my opinion, but I don&#039;t ever feel like this is a Nikon biased site at all.  Actually I appreciate that the admins have said repeatedly that it doesn&#039;t matter what you shoot with (eg: iphone fashion shoot).  I am personally a Nikon shooter but none of my clients would ever know the difference. That being said, I am pretty sure that there is nothing that is going to justify me purchasing the d800 over my existing d700.  The minute difference in photo quality that I may or may not see before post won&#039;t be enough....I will be buying this camera just to talk smack though.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just my opinion, but I don&#8217;t ever feel like this is a Nikon biased site at all.  Actually I appreciate that the admins have said repeatedly that it doesn&#8217;t matter what you shoot with (eg: iphone fashion shoot).  I am personally a Nikon shooter but none of my clients would ever know the difference. That being said, I am pretty sure that there is nothing that is going to justify me purchasing the d800 over my existing d700.  The minute difference in photo quality that I may or may not see before post won&#8217;t be enough&#8230;.</p><p>I will be buying this camera just to talk smack though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-the-new-nikon-d800-might-actually-look-like-this/comment-page-1#comment-29509</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=16136#comment-29509</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you Jon. Although I think historically the rev with an MP update gets the X instead of the S. Release the huge and slow d800 for the renewed megapixel race, then release a more sensible MP count rev of the d700 with 1080p at 60fps. No need for a new chassis design, just rearrange the back plate buttons for more video ergonomics and you&#039;re done.  No need to alienate all the people with nikon glass that have been drooling over the canon 5D m2. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you Jon. Although I think historically the rev with an MP update gets the X instead of the S. </p><p>Release the huge and slow d800 for the renewed megapixel race, then release a more sensible MP count rev of the d700 with 1080p at 60fps. No need for a new chassis design, just rearrange the back plate buttons for more video ergonomics and you&#8217;re done.  No need to alienate all the people with nikon glass that have been drooling over the canon 5D m2. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>