<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [News] Wedding Photog Sued Over Music: A Cautionary Tale</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 02:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30978</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30978</guid> <description><![CDATA[If Coldplay had to pay a settlement, why shouldn&#039;t this guy? ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Coldplay had to pay a settlement, why shouldn&#8217;t this guy? </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30977</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30977</guid> <description><![CDATA[My partner is sitting here with me, she&#039;s an IP lawyer for Warner music. She says you&#039;re completely wrong and that it&#039;s easy to get a license, and for something like Coldplay, it&#039;s pennies. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner is sitting here with me, she&#8217;s an IP lawyer for Warner music. She says you&#8217;re completely wrong and that it&#8217;s easy to get a license, and for something like Coldplay, it&#8217;s pennies. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30976</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30976</guid> <description><![CDATA[Loving the comments from people justifying this as &quot;free publicity&quot;. What planet are you on? The entities that have a financial interest in this will, rightly, protect their IP at all costs, because they&#039;re legally required to do so. You think a lawyer is sitting in EMI saying &quot;Hold on, hold on, we might get some free publicity out of this&quot;?Even if they did, that is not their job. Their job is to enforce copyright. Chris Martin might not give a crap about some dude using his shit music in a wedding video, but the labels, the publishers, and anyone else with a vested interest in the IP definitely will, because they rely on license fees to generate income.The guy who made this video is exactly what is wrong with the creative industry. Why is it OK for him to pick and choose his video soundtrack with such impunity? Let&#039;s see how he feels if Chris Martin decides to use his wedding video (which is his IP, not the couple&#039;s) as the music video for this song. I bet every penny I earn this year that he&#039;d be seeking representation within a split second of finding out. And that is where the problem lies. People think that because the next man is doing better than them, then it&#039;s seemingly OK to ride piggyback and profit from that person&#039;s hard work. It&#039;s not. I work my ass off in photoshoots, and nothing irks me more than someone trying to get me to work for free. Oh wait, something does irk me more - trying to get me to work for free under the shoddy pretence that the publicity will somehow benefit me.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loving the comments from people justifying this as &#8220;free publicity&#8221;. What planet are you on? </p><p>The entities that have a financial interest in this will, rightly, protect their IP at all costs, because they&#8217;re legally required to do so. You think a lawyer is sitting in EMI saying &#8220;Hold on, hold on, we might get some free publicity out of this&#8221;?</p><p>Even if they did, that is not their job. Their job is to enforce copyright. Chris Martin might not give a crap about some dude using his shit music in a wedding video, but the labels, the publishers, and anyone else with a vested interest in the IP definitely will, because they rely on license fees to generate income.</p><p>The guy who made this video is exactly what is wrong with the creative industry. Why is it OK for him to pick and choose his video soundtrack with such impunity? Let&#8217;s see how he feels if Chris Martin decides to use his wedding video (which is his IP, not the couple&#8217;s) as the music video for this song. I bet every penny I earn this year that he&#8217;d be seeking representation within a split second of finding out. </p><p>And that is where the problem lies. People think that because the next man is doing better than them, then it&#8217;s seemingly OK to ride piggyback and profit from that person&#8217;s hard work. It&#8217;s not. </p><p>I work my ass off in photoshoots, and nothing irks me more than someone trying to get me to work for free. Oh wait, something does irk me more &#8211; trying to get me to work for free under the shoddy pretence that the publicity will somehow benefit me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30812</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30812</guid> <description><![CDATA[People get up tight when people take down their video for copyrighted material. i ask you this, would you be mad if someone else used your images in a video that they were making money off of?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People get up tight when people take down their video for copyrighted material. i ask you this, would you be mad if someone else used your images in a video that they were making money off of?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jennifer Booher</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30726</link> <dc:creator>Jennifer Booher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30726</guid> <description><![CDATA[@David - that sounds like the Grateful Dead&#039;s business formula. Seems to have worked for them.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David &#8211; that sounds like the Grateful Dead&#8217;s business formula. Seems to have worked for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Simpson</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30681</link> <dc:creator>Robert Simpson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30681</guid> <description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t have to look far to find stories of auto workshops sued because they had a CD player (or even a radio) on in the garage, and this was considered an unauthorized &quot;public performance&quot; of the music. When it comes to the music industry, there&#039;s very little moderation nor common sense - if they can sue you, they will. Gotta love the RIAA ...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to look far to find stories of auto workshops sued because they had a CD player (or even a radio) on in the garage, and this was considered an unauthorized &#8220;public performance&#8221; of the music. When it comes to the music industry, there&#8217;s very little moderation nor common sense &#8211; if they can sue you, they will. Gotta love the RIAA &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Simpson</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30682</link> <dc:creator>Robert Simpson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30682</guid> <description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t have to look far to find stories of auto workshops sued because they had a CD player (or even a radio) on in the garage, and this was considered an unauthorized &quot;public performance&quot; of the music. When it comes to the music industry, there&#039;s very little moderation nor common sense - if they can sue you, they will. Gotta love the RIAA ...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to look far to find stories of auto workshops sued because they had a CD player (or even a radio) on in the garage, and this was considered an unauthorized &#8220;public performance&#8221; of the music. When it comes to the music industry, there&#8217;s very little moderation nor common sense &#8211; if they can sue you, they will. Gotta love the RIAA &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alberto Oscarelli</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30679</link> <dc:creator>Alberto Oscarelli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30679</guid> <description><![CDATA[Coldplay should just shut up....because they stole Joe Satriani&#039;s &quot;if i could fly&quot;, and made it theirs...renaming it &quot;Viva la vida&quot;. And guess what....they had to pay an undisclosed settlement as well...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coldplay should just shut up&#8230;.because they stole Joe Satriani&#8217;s &#8220;if i could fly&#8221;, and made it theirs&#8230;renaming it &#8220;Viva la vida&#8221;. And guess what&#8230;.they had to pay an undisclosed settlement as well&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Willie Barrio</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30670</link> <dc:creator>Willie Barrio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30670</guid> <description><![CDATA[But if I bought the it on I tunes for $2 bucks or the CD for $20 doesn&#039;t that give you any chance of doing what you please it was for a personal Video that was promoted as apart of a portfolio whats the big deal really? I feel that they should have a price bracket where then the music can not be used! What do you think?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if I bought the it on I tunes for $2 bucks or the CD for $20 doesn&#8217;t that give you any chance of doing what you please it was for a personal Video that was promoted as apart of a portfolio whats the big deal really? I feel that they should have a price bracket where then the music can not be used! What do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Willie Barrio</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/news-wedding-photog-sued-over-music-a-cautionary-tale/comment-page-1#comment-30669</link> <dc:creator>Willie Barrio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17276#comment-30669</guid> <description><![CDATA[But if I bought the it on I tunes for $2 bucks or the CD for $20 doesn&#039;t that give you any chance of doing what you please it was for a personal Video that was promoted as apart of a portfolio whats the big deal really? I feel that they should have a price bracket where then the music can not be used! What do you think?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if I bought the it on I tunes for $2 bucks or the CD for $20 doesn&#8217;t that give you any chance of doing what you please it was for a personal Video that was promoted as apart of a portfolio whats the big deal really? I feel that they should have a price bracket where then the music can not be used! What do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>