<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: PhaseOne&#8217;s New 645DF+ Medium Format SLR</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Stan Rogers</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50775</link> <dc:creator>Stan Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50775</guid> <description><![CDATA[That said, the need to carry (or at least have on hand) different batteries for the body and back has been an annoying niggle with the Phase One system. With long-life cells in the body, you only really need to worry about keeping the back fed now.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That said, the need to carry (or at least have on hand) different batteries for the body and back has been an annoying niggle with the Phase One system. With long-life cells in the body, you only really need to worry about keeping the back fed now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50720</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50720</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yup. I assumed as well based on my similar experience. Sorry for that mistake everyone. But Contax is a great system in that regard. Not a bad choice for film :-)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. I assumed as well based on my similar experience. Sorry for that mistake everyone. But Contax is a great system in that regard. Not a bad choice for film :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hunter Harrison</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50689</link> <dc:creator>Hunter Harrison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50689</guid> <description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know that the new PhaseOne&#039;s and Mamiya&#039;s wouldn&#039;t take film backs. I just assumed they would. I own an AFD-III (which I am selling) and I shoot only film on it. I had considered upgrading to a 645DF for a while, but I was going to stick with film. That sucks.Glad I moved to Contax 645 (which is why I am selling the above). ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know that the new PhaseOne&#8217;s and Mamiya&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t take film backs. I just assumed they would. I own an AFD-III (which I am selling) and I shoot only film on it. I had considered upgrading to a 645DF for a while, but I was going to stick with film. That sucks.</p><p>Glad I moved to Contax 645 (which is why I am selling the above).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thijs Bosma</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50684</link> <dc:creator>Thijs Bosma</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50684</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Phase One does this too.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Phase One does this too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50671</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50671</guid> <description><![CDATA[http://www.hasselbladusa.com/products/digital-backs/cfv-50.aspx]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hasselbladusa.com/products/digital-backs/cfv-50.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.hasselbladusa.com/products/digital-backs/cfv-50.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe Gunawan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50656</link> <dc:creator>Joe Gunawan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50656</guid> <description><![CDATA[Haha, well it does have a long battery life because it only powers the the camera body. The digital back, which eats up a lot of juice, has its own battery/power connection.- Joe]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, well it does have a long battery life because it only powers the the camera body. The digital back, which eats up a lot of juice, has its own battery/power connection.</p><p>- Joe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben Mulligan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50643</link> <dc:creator>Ben Mulligan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50643</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yeah the 645DF&#039;s wont take film backs, not an option anymore.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the 645DF&#8217;s wont take film backs, not an option anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50635</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50635</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wish there was a company that would create digital backs for  old medium format bodies (like Hasselblad&#039;s 500cm). With all that has been accomplished in the photographic world, no one can convince me it can&#039;t be done.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish there was a company that would create digital backs for  old medium format bodies (like Hasselblad&#8217;s 500cm). With all that has been accomplished in the photographic world, no one can convince me it can&#8217;t be done.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JabariHunt</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50623</link> <dc:creator>JabariHunt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50623</guid> <description><![CDATA[Why not for longevity?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not for longevity?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JabariHunt</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/phaseones-new-645df-medium-format-slr/comment-page-1#comment-50622</link> <dc:creator>JabariHunt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=52022#comment-50622</guid> <description><![CDATA[Fact Check: The 645DF doesn&#039;t take film backs, only digital. The Mamiya AFD III, which is the same camera as the PhaseOne 645AF were the last to take film backs.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact Check: The 645DF doesn&#8217;t take film backs, only digital. The Mamiya AFD III, which is the same camera as the PhaseOne 645AF were the last to take film backs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>