<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Photos From Ron Galella, America&#8217;s Most Famous Paparazzi</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Michael Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51633</link> <dc:creator>Michael Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51633</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s called &quot;Smash His Camera&quot;. Its on netflix right now.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called &#8220;Smash His Camera&#8221;. Its on netflix right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron Steinberg</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51632</link> <dc:creator>Aaron Steinberg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51632</guid> <description><![CDATA[I watched a documentary about him called &quot;Smash that Camera,&quot; it was actually a pretty interested show about and interested guy.  Look it up if you can, its worth an hour of your time.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched a documentary about him called &#8220;Smash that Camera,&#8221; it was actually a pretty interested show about and interested guy.  Look it up if you can, its worth an hour of your time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tobias Olbrich</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51573</link> <dc:creator>Tobias Olbrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51573</guid> <description><![CDATA[Uh dind`t know that Clint Eastwood ever were young ...Hochzeitsfotografwww.tobias-olbrich.de]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh dind`t know that Clint Eastwood ever were young &#8230;</p><p>Hochzeitsfotografwww.tobias-olbrich.de</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51565</link> <dc:creator>Michael Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51565</guid> <description><![CDATA[Paparazzi then shot film. They didn&#039;t have virtually UNLIMITED shooting thus if you were one of 3 photographers on site, you got your few shots and you left because shooting burst mode was not an option and even if it was, it would be way expensive.These images looked planed out and artistic at times. Celebs are so annoyed now because photographers shoot 100 frames with flash and a loud stupid dslr clapping away. No artistic vision, and no hope of producing a flattering image.So yes, things did look better then, especially the photography.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paparazzi then shot film. They didn&#8217;t have virtually UNLIMITED shooting thus if you were one of 3 photographers on site, you got your few shots and you left because shooting burst mode was not an option and even if it was, it would be way expensive.</p><p>These images looked planed out and artistic at times. Celebs are so annoyed now because photographers shoot 100 frames with flash and a loud stupid dslr clapping away. No artistic vision, and no hope of producing a flattering image.</p><p>So yes, things did look better then, especially the photography.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roman</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51562</link> <dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51562</guid> <description><![CDATA[One was less annoying than 35 but it is same thing.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One was less annoying than 35 but it is same thing. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carlos Zaya</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/photos-from-ron-galella-americas-most-famous-paparazzi/comment-page-1#comment-51558</link> <dc:creator>Carlos Zaya</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=53972#comment-51558</guid> <description><![CDATA[Did everything just looked better back in the days? Even the paparazzi! / www.zayaphotography.com]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did everything just looked better back in the days? Even the paparazzi! </p><p>/ <a href="http://www.zayaphotography.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zayaphotography.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>