<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Pic] Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Cover Is the Worst Photoshop I&#8217;ve Ever Seen</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Thomas Lawn</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-74384</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Lawn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-74384</guid> <description><![CDATA[This one is the worst. Look at her right leg! http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/swimsuit/modelfeatured/nina_agdal/2012/model/14/31/index.htm It looks like a vector drawing!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one is the worst. Look at her right leg! <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/swimsuit/modelfeatured/nina_agdal/2012/model/14/31/index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/swimsuit/modelfeatured/nina_agdal/2012/model/14/31/index.htm</a><br /> It looks like a vector drawing!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Antonio Carrasco</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-70118</link> <dc:creator>Antonio Carrasco</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-70118</guid> <description><![CDATA[And old media companies like Sports Illustrated and Playboy wonder why they are going broke.They fly the models, photographers and crew all over the world to shoot pictures and then come back home and ruin the photos with awful retouching that looks like cartoons. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And old media companies like Sports Illustrated and Playboy wonder why they are going broke.</p><p>They fly the models, photographers and crew all over the world to shoot pictures and then come back home and ruin the photos with awful retouching that looks like cartoons.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dev Ambardekar</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-64005</link> <dc:creator>Dev Ambardekar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-64005</guid> <description><![CDATA[The image below the featured image isn&#039;t loading for some reason. It shows a broken link.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The image below the featured image isn&#8217;t loading for some reason. It shows a broken link.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: peter25253</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-52486</link> <dc:creator>peter25253</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-52486</guid> <description><![CDATA[well you are a liar.. i bet my nuts that is not the worst photoshop job you have seen.....and yes.. that happens when you have cameras with to much DYNAMIC RANGE... the shadows will look faked..ROTFL.....]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well you are a liar.. i bet my nuts that is not the worst photoshop job you have seen&#8230;..</p><p>and yes.. that happens when you have cameras with to much DYNAMIC RANGE&#8230; the shadows will look faked..</p><p>ROTFL&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: viki reed</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-49127</link> <dc:creator>viki reed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-49127</guid> <description><![CDATA[Retouching high-end (pardon the pun) magazine photos meant to grab men in the you know what has NEVER been about realistic retouching.   Men already like to think that chicks don&#039;t go the bathroom, don&#039;t ever have body hair unless there&#039;s something wrong with them, zits, cellulite, wrinkles or crinkles.  The only time a real woman meets that criteria (because of a horny fog) is when a guy&#039;s wearing beer goggles or is about a key turn from entering their apartment after the third date.  Also, I don&#039;t know that SI is every specificially been touted as natural light and natural beauty.   Loads of behind the scenes videos show a variety of shooting styles.  One year it was a guy with a point and shoot consumer end camera, other times elaborate reflectors being held and dangled by a cabal of assistants, definitely speedlights and softboxes...sure, natural light and settings are exploited but this is far from real beauty.  Most grown women can&#039;t wear a 12 year old&#039;s bikini.    She does look like every hot chick warrior in every XBox or Playstation game though.....]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retouching high-end (pardon the pun) magazine photos meant to grab men in the you know what has NEVER been about realistic retouching.   Men already like to think that chicks don&#8217;t go the bathroom, don&#8217;t ever have body hair unless there&#8217;s something wrong with them, zits, cellulite, wrinkles or crinkles.  The only time a real woman meets that criteria (because of a horny fog) is when a guy&#8217;s wearing beer goggles or is about a key turn from entering their apartment after the third date.  </p><p>Also, I don&#8217;t know that SI is every specificially been touted as natural light and natural beauty.   Loads of behind the scenes videos show a variety of shooting styles.  One year it was a guy with a point and shoot consumer end camera, other times elaborate reflectors being held and dangled by a cabal of assistants, definitely speedlights and softboxes&#8230;sure, natural light and settings are exploited but this is far from real beauty.  Most grown women can&#8217;t wear a 12 year old&#8217;s bikini.    She does look like every hot chick warrior in every XBox or Playstation game though&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Murphy</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-2#comment-43911</link> <dc:creator>Michael Murphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-43911</guid> <description><![CDATA[the armpit job is more offensive to me than is the shadowing. imho.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the armpit job is more offensive to me than is the shadowing. imho.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shannon Wimberly</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-1#comment-42460</link> <dc:creator>Shannon Wimberly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-42460</guid> <description><![CDATA[maybe if she leaned forward, the M&amp;M effect i am seeing would have been a little less pronounced.... :/]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe if she leaned forward, the M&amp;M effect i am seeing would have been a little less pronounced&#8230;. :/</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacques</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-1#comment-42047</link> <dc:creator>Jacques</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-42047</guid> <description><![CDATA[The retouching could have been a little better, but you are overreacting to it.  It sounds like you are a bit jealous of sort that they are publishing work that are &#039;below&#039; your standards and that your work could have been there instead, or? ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The retouching could have been a little better, but you are overreacting to it.  It sounds like you are a bit jealous of sort that they are publishing work that are &#8216;below&#8217; your standards and that your work could have been there instead, or?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JimmySchaefer</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-1#comment-39690</link> <dc:creator>JimmySchaefer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-39690</guid> <description><![CDATA[Good find!  Although this could just be a water mark for the image as its still owned by someone online!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find!  Although this could just be a water mark for the image as its still owned by someone online!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jobbys</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pic-sports-illustrated-swimsuit-cover-is-the-worst-photoshop-ive-ever-seen/comment-page-1#comment-37820</link> <dc:creator>Jobbys</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=24577#comment-37820</guid> <description><![CDATA[I put a little animated Gif together to illustrate the point.(The Gif doesn&#039;t seem to work here, you can see at: http://jobbys.tumblr.com/post/21077246034/a-touch-here-or-there-bit-heavy-on-the-old )]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put a little animated Gif together to illustrate the point.</p><p>(The Gif doesn&#8217;t seem to work here, you can see at: <a href="http://jobbys.tumblr.com/post/21077246034/a-touch-here-or-there-bit-heavy-on-the-old" rel="nofollow">http://jobbys.tumblr.com/post/21077246034/a-touch-here-or-there-bit-heavy-on-the-old</a> )</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>