<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Pics/Video] How to Make Your Own Models</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jacob C.</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models/comment-page-1#comment-33716</link> <dc:creator>Jacob C.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23436#comment-33716</guid> <description><![CDATA[Very cool.. and all around the world!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool.. and all around the world!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Max Leitner</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models/comment-page-1#comment-33715</link> <dc:creator>Max Leitner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23436#comment-33715</guid> <description><![CDATA[So for conceptual reasons, I find it fairly lame. Sure the idea is kinda &quot;ok&quot; but this has been done before, by people such as Duane Hanson. I think the artist is giving away too much information or simply has a lack of concept. Giving the women in the trashcan as an example, whats the meaning behind the image? Disposable human figure? Or maybe a provocative image that women are useless. None of that is exactly how i think, but rather a start  of a conversation about strong conceptual art vs. weak concepts. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So for conceptual reasons, I find it fairly lame. Sure the idea is kinda &#8220;ok&#8221; but this has been done before, by people such as Duane Hanson. I think the artist is giving away too much information or simply has a lack of concept. Giving the women in the trashcan as an example, whats the meaning behind the image? Disposable human figure? Or maybe a provocative image that women are useless. None of that is exactly how i think, but rather a start  of a conversation about strong conceptual art vs. weak concepts. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dapo Faruk</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models/comment-page-1#comment-33703</link> <dc:creator>Dapo Faruk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23436#comment-33703</guid> <description><![CDATA[nice ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anthony Kurtz</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/picsvideo-how-to-make-your-own-models/comment-page-1#comment-33699</link> <dc:creator>Anthony Kurtz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=23436#comment-33699</guid> <description><![CDATA[So sweet. Love the woman in the trash can. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sweet. Love the woman in the trash can.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>