[Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

[Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

These images are absolutely unique in the way they’re taken. They were taken for the Berlin Philharmonic orchestra for their print campaign. The images show the insides of a violin, cello, flute, and pipe organ. The tight spaces of these instruments appear grand and spacious considering the true nature of their space.

Art direction by photographer Bjoern Ewers.

17 [Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

23 [Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

33 [Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

43 [Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

52 [Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

[Via Behance]

From Pratik:

I’d love to hear from you! Stop by and get in touch with me via my facebook page or my website, http://www.solsticeretouch.com.

Commercial

Pictures

« [Inspiration] Otherworldly Images Of The Phenomenon Known As A Murmuration

[Pics] Stunning Kaleidoscope-Inspired Aerial Images »

jeff gammons
Mind.Blown.
Anthony Hayes
WOW
Andres Castro
Wow….has this ever been done before?, Amazing!!!…props to the photographer for artistic vision and execution!!!!!
Gareth Bogdanoff
Now that is frikken cool!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=754554855 Edd Carlile
Incredible!
http://www.facebook.com/people/Igor-InvisibleSounds-Butckhrikidze/723953185 Igor InvisibleSounds Butckhrik
WOW!
bmldisp1001
Very nice. Thanks for sharing!
http://www.facebook.com/barrosandrew Andrew Barros
curious as to which macro he used.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=554360130 Cedric Gall
Isn’t no2 a guitar? (The shape of the inside and the circular hole?)
And couldn’t all the pictures be taken with a regular wide angle? DOF and POV sure as hell don’t look like macro, and I’m pretty sure that my canon 17-40 can pull off that close focus at f/22.
If you don’t believe me, grab a shoebox, cut it so its half as tall (roughly the size of a violin), punch some holes in the top for light to go in and a round hole in the back so you can stick your lens and try it yourself. The picture of the flute made me doubt though, and I’m not sure about how thick is the inside of a flute like the one in the picture, but I just took a picture of a crystal flower base from the same POV. The base is 2″ thick and 12″ long and I got a very similar DOF and POV to the one in the flute.Just saying… : )
http://profile.yahoo.com/RPDQSIUFJPQGUP3M6DDBSZEHRI Eric
Yeah, from what I can tell:
1) Cello / Bass (hard to tell which)
2) Guitar
3) Flute
4) Organ
5) Violin / Viola
I, too, wonder how these were taken. Did they sacrifice these instruments? Because I’m 100% sure you can’t fit an SLR and lens into the body of any string instrument through the f holes, hahaha.
TheRealDeanCollins
http://www.mierswa-kluska.de
Go to CGI. ;-)
http://wizzley.com/selling-photos-online/ Tilen Hrovatic
amazing! beautiful :)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=716882270 Clay Kerri
That was my suspicion too. The real challenge is for someone to actually do this with a camera now. No cheating!
http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Harrison/1278527186 David Harrison
these are so cool, wish i had thought of idea. beautiful!
http://profile.yahoo.com/YJE2XECMBQXRIEFD3GFGKUIGJI Björn
but the images in the CGI section look like CGI and the other images not.
Stewart C. Lewis
Wicked !!!!!
pookiepookieca
Hmm…. Who’s a naughty boy….
No one is safe on the internet….
apercep
I’m guessing focus stacking, like with Helicon… but nonetheless, absolutely stunning work!!!!!!
Jjjustinnn
I’m confused now. Are they CGI or not?
On the art directors website (Björn Ewers) he clearly credits Mierswa Kluska as the photographer(s) and when I look at their website they have both the CGI images mentioned above and the images used in the promotion. The CGI images are obviously of a lower quality but their similarity in composition is almost identical with the promo-images; which more or less makes me wonder if the CGI’s shown are just drafts of what was used later on or similar by coincidence.
Given this fact I actually start to think that they’re more CGI’s than photos. Maybe just with really good textures.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Claus-Nørgaard-Nielsen/725288712 Claus Nørgaard Nielsen
WOW
http://www.facebook.com/janaka.rodrigue Janaka Rodrigue-Photography
They are 100% all CGI images. Unfortunately! Still – his control of lighting in 3D modelling and texturing is fantastic
jeff gammons
Anyone want to permanently loan me a cello?
http://www.facebook.com/Dougrb Douglas Bain
It’s not CGI: http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/instruments-from-inside
http://www.facebook.com/keropaji Ratthanan Nalintasnai
Thanks for sharing. awesome shots :)
http://www.facebook.com/martin.melnick Martin Melnick
Where did you get the idea that these were cgi? The title of that page says special fx, not cgi. First off, cgi is a visual effect, not a special effect and it’s obvious if you look at that page that there are real photographs that have just had a lot of post-proc. done to them. Where did you come up with the cgi thing? Plus, it says in text on the images.
http://www.facebook.com/adamcphotography Adam Correia
I absolutely LOVE these images! Being a musician I have a certain appreciation for this work.

[Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

Fstoppers Originals

Popular Articles

Recent Comments

Support Fstoppers

[Pictures] Unbelievable Macro Shots Taken Inside Instruments

Connect with Fstoppers

Fstoppers Originals

Popular Articles

Recent Comments

Support Fstoppers