<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [News] Pre-Release Nikon D800/D800E Details</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jonathan Lee</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33124</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33124</guid> <description><![CDATA[The &quot;Read the full details and D800 specs in the full post&quot; links to the manbabies article]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Read the full details and D800 specs in the full post&#8221; links to the manbabies article</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33091</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33091</guid> <description><![CDATA[ listen to what your saying. a medium format sensor is about 4x&#039;s the size of a full frame or 35mm sensor. meaning if you blew up a 5d mark II&#039;s sensor 4 times the IQ 180 digital back would still have a less dense pixel count.My original point is that putting 36 million sensors on a 35mm plane seems like a crowd, just like when you put too many mega pixels on a p&amp;s camera the sensors get confused and start making up information, this is my fear with the Nikon.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> listen to what your saying. a medium format sensor is about 4x&#8217;s the size of a full frame or 35mm sensor. meaning if you blew up a 5d mark II&#8217;s sensor 4 times the IQ 180 digital back would still have a less dense pixel count.</p><p>My original point is that putting 36 million sensors on a 35mm plane seems like a crowd, just like when you put too many mega pixels on a p&amp;s camera the sensors get confused and start making up information, this is my fear with the Nikon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33085</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33085</guid> <description><![CDATA[ I think you are wrong. The ability to recover shadows&#039; details and colors with D7000 is directly related to the very wide DR at base ISO, which was measured by DxO Mark.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think you are wrong. The ability to recover shadows&#8217; details and colors with D7000 is directly related to the very wide DR at base ISO, which was measured by DxO Mark.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33084</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33084</guid> <description><![CDATA[ The density and photosite size will be similar to that o fthe D7000, not bad quality there, excellent DR, for example. Don&#039;t forget one should compare cameras at same final print size, at least initially. If one wants to print larger, the 36MP will be handy.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The density and photosite size will be similar to that o fthe D7000, not bad quality there, excellent DR, for example. Don&#8217;t forget one should compare cameras at same final print size, at least initially. If one wants to print larger, the 36MP will be handy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick Hall</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33076</link> <dc:creator>Patrick Hall</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33076</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lol I meant Official Photos leaked not officially leaked]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol I meant Official Photos leaked not officially leaked</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ghislain Leduc</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33073</link> <dc:creator>Ghislain Leduc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33073</guid> <description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen some excellent results with V1 and J1... Even with HIGH ISO shots, they are pretty good. The only bad vibe I&#039;ve received from persons I know who purchased it is indoors.... Images are too blurry because Auto ISO is too conservative.... but beside that, video and pictures are TOP from what they&#039;ve told me..]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen some excellent results with V1 and J1&#8230; Even with HIGH ISO shots, they are pretty good. The only bad vibe I&#8217;ve received from persons I know who purchased it is indoors&#8230;. Images are too blurry because Auto ISO is too conservative&#8230;. but beside that, video and pictures are TOP from what they&#8217;ve told me..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Travis Alex</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33074</link> <dc:creator>Travis Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33074</guid> <description><![CDATA[Not to sure how I feel yet...just seems to good to be true...as well, these specs are not looking to promising aside from the 100% view as far as I&#039;m concerned. Going to have to wait until we see some real reviews. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to sure how I feel yet&#8230;just seems to good to be true&#8230;as well, these specs are not looking to promising aside from the 100% view as far as I&#8217;m concerned. Going to have to wait until we see some real reviews. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: artiisanphotography</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33066</link> <dc:creator>artiisanphotography</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33066</guid> <description><![CDATA[this is a disappointment ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a disappointment </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike M</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33060</link> <dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33060</guid> <description><![CDATA[Lol dude... how is some random camera blog going to get pre-announcement high rez images of a camera that may not actually exist yet? Do you honestly think the new version of the small body FF camera would look exactly the same this time around, when Nikon always tweaks it somewhat?Seriously bro, you need to get out more.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol dude&#8230; how is some random camera blog going to get pre-announcement high rez images of a camera that may not actually exist yet? </p><p>Do you honestly think the new version of the small body FF camera would look exactly the same this time around, when Nikon always tweaks it somewhat?</p><p>Seriously bro, you need to get out more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike M</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/pre-release-nikon-d800/comment-page-1#comment-33059</link> <dc:creator>Mike M</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=22474#comment-33059</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patrick, for the record, nothing is ever &quot;officially&quot; leaked.  That&#039;s the entire premise of leaking lol.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick, for the record, nothing is ever &#8220;officially&#8221; leaked.  That&#8217;s the entire premise of leaking lol.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>