Comments on: [Rare Lens] $160,000 Nikkor 6mm 2.8 Fisheye Can See Behind You

By: Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Oh god i want that thing!

By: Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Oh god i want that thing!

By: Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Oh god i want that thing!

By: Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Oh god i want that thing!

By: Chris Campbell

Chris Campbell — Wed, 09 May 2012 20:15:00 +0000

Oh god i want that thing!

By: Chris Lyn

Chris Lyn — Tue, 08 May 2012 23:39:00 +0000

Well they could have easily taken photos with it mounted when they took that video.

By: Keith Hammond

Keith Hammond — Tue, 08 May 2012 23:27:00 +0000

it’s been sold now http://blog.graysofwestminster.co.uk/2012/05/01/amateur-photographer-nikon’s-100k-fisheye-lens-whopper-finds-buyer/

By: Alexandre Dias

Alexandre Dias — Tue, 08 May 2012 22:22:00 +0000

The video is not that exciting but alll the negative comments are to harsh: what did you except??? This is just a curiosity article! About the “See behind itself” thing: if you draw a line parallel to the sensor at the front of the lens, you have a 180ª angle- this camera has a 220º angle of view, so it can see behind the front of the lens

By: Nathan Hamler

Nathan Hamler — Tue, 08 May 2012 21:29:00 +0000

BTW, do you think ANYONE would take this lens outside and shoot all the AWESOME footage you guys are complaining that isn’t shown here?? all it takes is one mistake, the 1 in a MILLION chance that something goes wrong, and you have a potentially VERY costly problem….$160,000?? Did you SEE how much bubble wrap and extra packaging there was around that thing?? no way they’re ever taking it outside to shoot samples…we’ll have to wait and see who buys it, and maybe they’ll shoot some samples…

By: BK553

BK553 — Tue, 08 May 2012 20:02:00 +0000

The most underwhelming, ridiculous, overpriced lens ever made. It looks like crappy security camera footage.