<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Real or Fake? Image of Canon 135mm f/1.8</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Simon Lagoarde</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-47167</link> <dc:creator>Simon Lagoarde</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-47167</guid> <description><![CDATA[In addition to the text alignment problem, the &quot;L&quot; is far too saturated to be printed on the optic. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the text alignment problem, the &#8220;L&#8221; is far too saturated to be printed on the optic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacob DelaRosa</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46935</link> <dc:creator>Jacob DelaRosa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46935</guid> <description><![CDATA[I would jump ship from Nikon just to use a lens like this. Bokehlicious!!!!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would jump ship from Nikon just to use a lens like this. Bokehlicious!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicholas</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46933</link> <dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46933</guid> <description><![CDATA[Real or fake, the original 135L rules. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real or fake, the original 135L rules.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maksimilian Dikarev</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46906</link> <dc:creator>Maksimilian Dikarev</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46906</guid> <description><![CDATA[The text looks wrong. And the lens is way too small to be IS and to be 1.8. As much as I wish it was real, this just looks like a digital creation.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text looks wrong. And the lens is way too small to be IS and to be 1.8. As much as I wish it was real, this just looks like a digital creation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stan Olszewski</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46901</link> <dc:creator>Stan Olszewski</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46901</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think this very well could be true.  The texture and color matches other lenses that have recently been released, including the 24-70 f/2.8L II.  I owned the 135L and absolutely loved the images it produced, though I did wish it had IS for general portraiture.  If this 135 f/1.8L IS comes out, I would buy it ASAP!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this very well could be true.  The texture and color matches other lenses that have recently been released, including the 24-70 f/2.8L II.  I owned the 135L and absolutely loved the images it produced, though I did wish it had IS for general portraiture.  If this 135 f/1.8L IS comes out, I would buy it ASAP!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Theis Kofoed Hjorth</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46899</link> <dc:creator>Theis Kofoed Hjorth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46899</guid> <description><![CDATA[Nikon makes good wideangles, and Canon makes good telephotos - I don&#039;t think you can say that one entire lineup is better than another.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon makes good wideangles, and Canon makes good telephotos &#8211; I don&#8217;t think you can say that one entire lineup is better than another.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Theis Kofoed Hjorth</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46898</link> <dc:creator>Theis Kofoed Hjorth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46898</guid> <description><![CDATA[This could very well just be a production mockup, I suppose they would make some before going into production? Plus, it&#039;s already patented, so maybe ... I like the look, so I&#039;m crossing my fingers.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could very well just be a production mockup, I suppose they would make some before going into production? Plus, it&#8217;s already patented, so maybe &#8230; I like the look, so I&#8217;m crossing my fingers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Elliott.G.Montello</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46896</link> <dc:creator>Elliott.G.Montello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46896</guid> <description><![CDATA[Snob...kidding. Nikon does have better glass then canon but canon kicks ass on the video front so what you gunna do...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snob&#8230;kidding. Nikon does have better glass then canon but canon kicks ass on the video front so what you gunna do&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcelo Borges Tezza Pereira</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46893</link> <dc:creator>Marcelo Borges Tezza Pereira</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46893</guid> <description><![CDATA[Totally agree, its easy to see thats fake because of the text...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, its easy to see thats fake because of the text&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jasmeet Jassie Singh</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/real-or-fake-image-of-canon-135mm-f1-8/comment-page-1#comment-46891</link> <dc:creator>Jasmeet Jassie Singh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=45005#comment-46891</guid> <description><![CDATA[it could actually be real as canon is focusing more towards video and prime IS lenses. i won&#039;t be surprised if canon announces this lens soon. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it could actually be real as canon is focusing more towards video and prime IS lenses. i won&#8217;t be surprised if canon announces this lens soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>