<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Review] Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 VC VS Canon 24-70mm</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 08:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Darci</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-75927</link> <dc:creator>Darci</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-75927</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is the kind of review I&#039;ve been searching for. Back to back samples! Thank you for the review, I found it very helpful!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the kind of review I&#8217;ve been searching for. Back to back samples! Thank you for the review, I found it very helpful!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mahmoud Marie</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-64062</link> <dc:creator>Mahmoud Marie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-64062</guid> <description><![CDATA[your recommendation please Tamron or Canon?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your recommendation please Tamron or Canon?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PMagi</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-61338</link> <dc:creator>PMagi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-61338</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just got the Tamron 24-70 VC because it sounded very interesting for video filming and wrote a quick review vs. my Canon 24-70, with special regard to bokeh testing, if anyone is interested! I included example pictures of Tamron&#039;s highlight bokeh with image stabilizer and without image stabilizer compared to the one of the Canon lens.http://www.fotograf-stockholm.nu/tamron-24-70-vc-vs-canon-24-70-for-stills-and-video-filming-image-stabilization-and-bokeh-test/ ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the Tamron 24-70 VC because it<br /> sounded very interesting for video filming and wrote a quick review vs. my Canon 24-70, with special regard to bokeh testing, if anyone is<br /> interested!<br /> I included example pictures of Tamron&#8217;s highlight bokeh with image stabilizer and without image stabilizer compared to the one of the Canon lens.</p><p><a href="http://www.fotograf-stockholm.nu/tamron-24-70-vc-vs-canon-24-70-for-stills-and-video-filming-image-stabilization-and-bokeh-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fotograf-stockholm.nu/tamron-24-70-vc-vs-canon-24-70-for-stills-and-video-filming-image-stabilization-and-bokeh-test/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lorenzo P</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-53910</link> <dc:creator>Lorenzo P</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-53910</guid> <description><![CDATA[Great Review Lee keep em coming!! ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Review Lee keep em coming!! </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kaja12</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-53730</link> <dc:creator>kaja12</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-53730</guid> <description><![CDATA[the 6D...?  i pitty you....]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 6D&#8230;?  i pitty you&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kaja12</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-53729</link> <dc:creator>kaja12</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-53729</guid> <description><![CDATA[yep]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Tower</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-52800</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Tower</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-52800</guid> <description><![CDATA[I owned the VC 17-50 Tamron and liked it alot for video and photo&#039;s. I used it on my 7D. I since sold my 7D and 17-50 VC. I am now getting the new FF 6D when it comes out. This new VC 24-70 looks awesome! THANK YOU!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned the VC 17-50 Tamron and liked it alot for video and photo&#8217;s. I used it on my 7D. I since sold my 7D and 17-50 VC. I am now getting the new FF 6D when it comes out. This new VC 24-70 looks awesome! THANK YOU!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oliver El Helou</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-46157</link> <dc:creator>Oliver El Helou</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-46157</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hi Lee, I totally agree, I own both, I could not resist the slow hand-held capabilities of the VC version and the sharpness of the Non VC version, although it sounds like it&#039;s auditioning for the next Transformers character, the sharpness is unrivalled, I have even broken even with Canon&#039;s 16-35 f/2.8. However I can send you a sample I have taken with it. Really worth/Another thing to ad that people really tend to forget, many times lenses differ in performance even brand new, I have had &#039;&#039;lucky copies&#039;&#039; of lenses that are supposed to SUCK REAL BAD!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lee, I totally agree, I own both, I could not resist the slow hand-held capabilities of the VC version and the sharpness of the Non VC version, although it sounds like it&#8217;s auditioning for the next Transformers character, the sharpness is unrivalled, I have even broken even with Canon&#8217;s 16-35 f/2.8. However I can send you a sample I have taken with it.<br /> Really worth/</p><p>Another thing to ad that people really tend to forget, many times lenses differ in performance even brand new, I have had &#8221;lucky copies&#8221; of lenses that are supposed to SUCK REAL BAD!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-45709</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-45709</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patrick - Awesome.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8211; Awesome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Dishler</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/review-tamron-24-70mm-2-8-vc-vs-canon-24-70mm/comment-page-1#comment-44886</link> <dc:creator>Jon Dishler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=35338#comment-44886</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just received my copy of the Nikon version, seems fairly similar to the Nikon 24-70 but a little wider with more barrel distortion at 28 and slightly more vignetting.  Very sharp with and without VC.  It definitely helps video stability.  Stills at 1/20 are way sharper with VC.  My question/issue is that I noticed that when zoomed to 70 with the barrel extended, if you look at the end that attaches to the camera, a lot of circuitry is exposed around the optics.  Could any dust, debris, etc. fall out of this area and into the sensor of my new D4 during heavy use?  All my Nikon lenses are sealed where they attach to the camera. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received my copy of the Nikon version, seems fairly similar to the Nikon 24-70 but a little wider with more barrel distortion at 28 and slightly more vignetting.  Very sharp with and without VC.  It definitely helps video stability.  Stills at 1/20 are way sharper with VC. <br /> My question/issue is that I noticed that when zoomed to 70 with the barrel extended, if you look at the end that attaches to the camera, a lot of circuitry is exposed around the optics.  Could any dust, debris, etc. fall out of this area and into the sensor of my new D4 during heavy use?  All my Nikon lenses are sealed where they attach to the camera.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>