<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Sigma Unveils Latest Compact Camera in the DP3 Merrill</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: GokhanCukurova</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61304</link> <dc:creator>GokhanCukurova</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61304</guid> <description><![CDATA[75mm? LMAO here. Someone is comparing this camera to RX1 or even a medium format digital. God help me understand some ppl.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>75mm? LMAO here.<br /> Someone is comparing this camera to RX1 or even a medium format digital. God help me understand some ppl.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dirk Beichert</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61222</link> <dc:creator>Dirk Beichert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61222</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s really funny to read the first posts... However, having owned a DP1s I found out about its pros and cons the hard way. It is a diva - and I suppose the DP3 Merrill will be as well.Yes, the sensor really captures 46 million pixels. No, the resulting image file will not have 46 million pixels. It will have a third of that number, but with superb sharpness and amazingly clean and accurate color.The movie recording mode should really be up to par with current 30$ smartphones... 720p at minimum. On my DP1s, even the VGA mode was close to unusable... so why bother...In low light conditions the DP1s (with an f4 lens) was terribly slow (even the s-model should have been &quot;faster&quot; than its predecessor). Indoors the camera was utterly useless. The included tiny flash didn&#039;t make things better. So I really would hope that the DP3 Merrill is a lot better here and this would make this thing a real screamer.Portrait focal length at f2,8 with a prime lens (and Sigma really knows how to do lenses) and the great sensor would really be tempting for me... the price point will however be a challenge. The little sisters DP1 and DP2 Merrill retail at 1.100 Euros - and I don&#039;t expect the DP3 to be any cheaper...Quite a lot of money for a camera that I would only use for things like street photography...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really funny to read the first posts&#8230; However, having owned a DP1s I found out about its pros and cons the hard way. It is a diva &#8211; and I suppose the DP3 Merrill will be as well.</p><p>Yes, the sensor really captures 46 million pixels. No, the resulting image file will not have 46 million pixels. It will have a third of that number, but with superb sharpness and amazingly clean and accurate color.</p><p>The movie recording mode should really be up to par with current 30$ smartphones&#8230; 720p at minimum. On my DP1s, even the VGA mode was close to unusable&#8230; so why bother&#8230;</p><p>In low light conditions the DP1s (with an f4 lens) was terribly slow (even the s-model should have been &#8220;faster&#8221; than its predecessor). Indoors the camera was utterly useless. The included tiny flash didn&#8217;t make things better. So I really would hope that the DP3 Merrill is a lot better here and this would make this thing a real screamer.</p><p>Portrait focal length at f2,8 with a prime lens (and Sigma really knows how to do lenses) and the great sensor would really be tempting for me&#8230; the price point will however be a challenge. The little sisters DP1 and DP2 Merrill retail at 1.100 Euros &#8211; and I don&#8217;t expect the DP3 to be any cheaper&#8230;</p><p>Quite a lot of money for a camera that I would only use for things like street photography&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mihai Radulescu</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61193</link> <dc:creator>Mihai Radulescu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61193</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well, the DP2 certainly had a leaf shutter and synced with the flash at any shutter speed (up to its maximum of 1/2000 !)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the DP2 certainly had a leaf shutter and synced with the flash at any shutter speed (up to its maximum of 1/2000 !)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bryan Leighty</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61133</link> <dc:creator>Bryan Leighty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61133</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Michael - where do you see this having a leaf shutter?  I did an extensive google search and see nothing about that.  On sigma&#039;s site it has full tech write up and nothing about leaf.... ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Michael &#8211; where do you see this having a leaf shutter?  I did an extensive google search and see nothing about that.  On sigma&#8217;s site it has full tech write up and nothing about leaf&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61105</link> <dc:creator>Michael Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61105</guid> <description><![CDATA[This camera is NUTS. So awesome. I don&#039;t think many understand the type of file it produces and what type of photographer would use this camera. It&#039;s not for wedding shooters for family photogs. This is for someone in a controlled environment for a long period of time that requires AMAZING image quality but doesn&#039;t want to invest into medium format to get it. It&#039;s right on par with the d800e but it has one trick that the d800e does not have..........a leaf shutter. There is nothing else in the market that has this type of image quality, at this price, with a leaf shutter. Don&#039;t even bother mentioning the rx1 because its not even close when it comes to image quality.I hope this helps with understanding.http://theiropinion.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-i-did-it-1-photography-series-by.html]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera is NUTS. So awesome. I don&#8217;t think many understand the type of file it produces and what type of photographer would use this camera. It&#8217;s not for wedding shooters for family photogs. This is for someone in a controlled environment for a long period of time that requires AMAZING image quality but doesn&#8217;t want to invest into medium format to get it. It&#8217;s right on par with the d800e but it has one trick that the d800e does not have&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.a leaf shutter. There is nothing else in the market that has this type of image quality, at this price, with a leaf shutter. Don&#8217;t even bother mentioning the rx1 because its not even close when it comes to image quality.</p><p>I hope this helps with understanding.</p><p><a href="http://theiropinion.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-i-did-it-1-photography-series-by.html" rel="nofollow">http://theiropinion.blogspot.com/2013/01/how-i-did-it-1-photography-series-by.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chuck Navarro</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61101</link> <dc:creator>Chuck Navarro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61101</guid> <description><![CDATA[I saw that too!  Why even bother?  lol]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that too!  Why even bother?  lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Davor Desancic</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61088</link> <dc:creator>Davor Desancic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61088</guid> <description><![CDATA[WOW it even has VGA recording mode!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW it even has VGA recording mode!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mortimer121</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/sigma-unveils-latest-compact-camera-dp3-merrill/comment-page-1#comment-61070</link> <dc:creator>mortimer121</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=66029#comment-61070</guid> <description><![CDATA[i don´t know why you as self claimed &quot;experts&quot; still support the wrong claim that this is a 46MP sensor.compared to a bayer sensor with 46 MP the foveon would have less spatial resolution.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don´t know why you as self claimed &#8220;experts&#8221; still support the wrong claim that this is a 46MP sensor.</p><p>compared to a bayer sensor with 46 MP the foveon would have less spatial resolution.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foveon_X3_sensor</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>