<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Software Rates How Drastically Photos Are Retouched</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: DwightBretonvanGroll</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-50764</link> <dc:creator>DwightBretonvanGroll</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-50764</guid> <description><![CDATA[And the product is called FourMatch (sucky name) ... and it will cost (guess what) $890,-. It will identify images with a red, yellow or green light. Red means the program is 100% sure the JPEG file is modified and green when the program is 100% sure the JPEG file isn&#039;t modified. The Yellow... well thats when it doesn&#039;t really know for sure if the JPEG is modified or not and most likely that will happen with most of the JPEGs when using this program..Way to expensive for something that will most likely will only be used by... I don&#039;t know.... no one?....]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the product is called FourMatch (sucky name) &#8230; and it will cost (guess what) $890,-.<br /> It will identify images with a red, yellow or green light. Red means the program is 100% sure the JPEG file is modified and green when the program is 100% sure the JPEG file isn&#8217;t modified. The Yellow&#8230; well thats when it doesn&#8217;t really know for sure if the JPEG is modified or not and most likely that will happen with most of the JPEGs when using this program..</p><p>Way to expensive for something that will most likely will only be used by&#8230; I don&#8217;t know&#8230;. no one?&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Birling</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-49478</link> <dc:creator>Doug Birling</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-49478</guid> <description><![CDATA[I find it ironic that on the same page I see the ad for Portrait Professional with the beauty slider...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that on the same page I see the ad for Portrait Professional with the beauty slider&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Noah Schäfer</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-49454</link> <dc:creator>Noah Schäfer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-49454</guid> <description><![CDATA[It is a sad day indeed, when we have to remind people  - with a warning label - that advertisment may be not totaly truthfull after all. I will not even discuss these so called &quot;studies&quot; that link a change in a society to a product (in this case advertising) which is in on itself a reflection of this very change in society. It is impossible to state to any meaningful level of certainty, that images contribute to a harmful transformation of ones self-image, if there is no way at all to exclude the influence of the way this new &quot;ideal of beauty&quot; is handled in society. I&#039;m so glad that there won&#039;t be another case of anorexia nervosa as soon as there is a warning labeln on all glamour magazines.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a sad day indeed, when we have to remind people  &#8211; with a warning label &#8211; that advertisment may be not totaly truthfull after all.<br /> I will not even discuss these so called &#8220;studies&#8221; that link a change in a society to a product (in this case advertising) which is in on itself a reflection of this very change in society. It is impossible to state to any meaningful level of certainty, that images contribute to a harmful transformation of ones self-image, if there is no way at all to exclude the influence of the way this new &#8220;ideal of beauty&#8221; is handled in society.<br /> I&#8217;m so glad that there won&#8217;t be another case of anorexia nervosa as soon as there is a warning labeln on all glamour magazines.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Albi Kl</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-49448</link> <dc:creator>Albi Kl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-49448</guid> <description><![CDATA[It is now considered politically correct to villainize the beauty industry as the source for western societies image problem woes. The typical human response to pass blame to an external source than to seek a solution from within.It is absurd that anyone would think that altering the content of the beauty industry will by pure magic stop humans from finding reasons to discriminate against each other.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now considered politically correct to villainize the beauty industry as the source for western societies image problem woes. The typical human response to pass blame to an external source than to seek a solution from within.</p><p>It is absurd that anyone would think that altering the content of the beauty industry will by pure magic stop humans from finding reasons to discriminate against each other.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Sund</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-49441</link> <dc:creator>Adam Sund</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-49441</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here we go again - Kaspersky is finding trojan horses on this link  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again &#8211; Kaspersky is finding trojan horses on this link<br />  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JessicaF</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/software-rates-how-drastically-photos-are-retouched/comment-page-1#comment-49439</link> <dc:creator>JessicaF</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=48798#comment-49439</guid> <description><![CDATA[Imperfections are more interesting. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imperfections are more interesting. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>