<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Student Final Project: Swallowing 35mm Film</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Samuel Cain</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-58454</link> <dc:creator>Samuel Cain</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-58454</guid> <description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe how many people are condemning this article as false without looking into it... The film was swallowed inside of its plastic feed, this is why there was no laceration. The images that we see from the electron microscope are the result of the damage that their bodies caused to the film and traces of bodily tissue left upon the emulsion surface. True, the film did not capture photos but it became the backdrop for the subject. If you still think it is &quot;bullshit&quot;, then it is the art and the artists that you should criticize, not the website or writer who simply reported about what the students did.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe how many people are condemning this article as false without looking into it&#8230; The film was swallowed inside of its plastic feed, this is why there was no laceration. The images that we see from the electron microscope are the result of the damage that their bodies caused to the film and traces of bodily tissue left upon the emulsion surface. True, the film did not capture photos but it became the backdrop for the subject. If you still think it is &#8220;bullshit&#8221;, then it is the art and the artists that you should criticize, not the website or writer who simply reported about what the students did.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James W. Strength</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-43372</link> <dc:creator>James W. Strength</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-43372</guid> <description><![CDATA[I dont find this to be even remotely true! If they did swallow the 35mm slide film, it would lacerate their intestines. Lacerations in the intestines is deadly. Causing serious bacterial infection that the body cant fight off. They would have died without medical attention. What a joke.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont find this to be even remotely true! If they did swallow the 35mm slide film, it would lacerate their intestines. Lacerations in the intestines is deadly. Causing serious bacterial infection that the body cant fight off. They would have died without medical attention. What a joke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JasonV</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-43009</link> <dc:creator>JasonV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-43009</guid> <description><![CDATA[hahah @ all the hipsters who thought this was amazing..would have been more interesting to see pictures of them digging thru shit to find the shitty film]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahah @ all the hipsters who thought this was amazing..would have been more interesting to see pictures of them digging thru shit to find the shitty film</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Colten Audivaré</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42929</link> <dc:creator>Colten Audivaré</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42929</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is complete bullshit.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is complete bullshit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MarkFore</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42895</link> <dc:creator>MarkFore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42895</guid> <description><![CDATA[ there&#039;s other ways of using light than just the visible spectrum. It&#039;s most likely xray slide film that they shot (The same kind that your dentist uses). They do not explain it on either article, but you have to realize their is more film out their than just the run of the mill 35mm]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> there&#8217;s other ways of using light than just the visible spectrum. It&#8217;s most likely xray slide film that they shot (The same kind that your dentist uses). They do not explain it on either article, but you have to realize their is more film out their than just the run of the mill 35mm</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MarkFore</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42893</link> <dc:creator>MarkFore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42893</guid> <description><![CDATA[ I think what the article neglects to mention is that it&#039;s probably 35mm xray slide film. That&#039;s just my guess]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think what the article neglects to mention is that it&#8217;s probably 35mm xray slide film. That&#8217;s just my guess</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Qashrul Hidafi</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42891</link> <dc:creator>Qashrul Hidafi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42891</guid> <description><![CDATA[I happen to be a biologist and a professional photographer and I agree with most of the comments here that this is just bullshit. Tons of gorgeous images come out from the electron microscope, this is definitely not one of them.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to be a biologist and a professional photographer and I agree with most of the comments here that this is just bullshit. Tons of gorgeous images come out from the electron microscope, this is definitely not one of them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seshan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42890</link> <dc:creator>Seshan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42890</guid> <description><![CDATA[How does the stomach not dissolve it?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the stomach not dissolve it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zaggerman</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42889</link> <dc:creator>zaggerman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42889</guid> <description><![CDATA[How do posts like this make it past quality control? Photography 101 would teach us that this &quot;method&quot; is not possible using film. This is common sense. Ftsoppers, where did you find these posters? Seriously? Were they at least interviewed first? - What&#039;s worse is that this was re-posted a day later on Facebook. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do posts like this make it past quality control? Photography 101 would teach us that this &#8220;method&#8221; is not possible using film. This is common sense. Ftsoppers, where did you find these posters? Seriously? Were they at least interviewed first? &#8211; What&#8217;s worse is that this was re-posted a day later on Facebook. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrea Bacle</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/student-final-project-swallowing-35mm-film/comment-page-1#comment-42887</link> <dc:creator>Andrea Bacle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=38395#comment-42887</guid> <description><![CDATA[People are officially out of ideas on what to do with old film.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are officially out of ideas on what to do with old film.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>