<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Hubble Telescope Shows Galaxies 13.2 Billion Years Old</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old/comment-page-1#comment-51616</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.net/?p=53476#comment-51616</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well, to do it with two cameras would require that they be thousands of light years apart in order to simulate depth on a universal level. Just a wish of mine, really. I know it&#039;s not possible.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, to do it with two cameras would require that they be thousands of light years apart in order to simulate depth on a universal level. </p><p>Just a wish of mine, really. I know it&#8217;s not possible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old/comment-page-1#comment-51615</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.net/?p=53476#comment-51615</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sorry, I put less than zero replies, but meant MORE than zero. Shame this kind of work doesn&#039;t get more views. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I put less than zero replies, but meant MORE than zero. Shame this kind of work doesn&#8217;t get more views. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon Lynch</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old/comment-page-1#comment-51535</link> <dc:creator>Simon Lynch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.net/?p=53476#comment-51535</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t the NASA need 2 camera in space? At the price of 1... ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the NASA need 2 camera in space? At the price of 1&#8230; </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Godwin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-hubble-telescope-shows-galaxies-13-2-billion-years-old/comment-page-1#comment-51450</link> <dc:creator>John Godwin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.net/?p=53476#comment-51450</guid> <description><![CDATA[This deserves less than zero replies. I love this image, and all other deep field images, but I wish there was a way you should simulate the scale. With a parallax of some kind. I doubt it&#039;s possible, but it would be cool if you could get some comprehension of the depth. Not complaining, though, image is incredible. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deserves less than zero replies. </p><p>I love this image, and all other deep field images, but I wish there was a way you should simulate the scale. With a parallax of some kind. I doubt it&#8217;s possible, but it would be cool if you could get some comprehension of the depth. </p><p>Not complaining, though, image is incredible. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>