<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Intimate Work of Jenny Woods (NSFW)</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: tyrohne</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64883</link> <dc:creator>tyrohne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64883</guid> <description><![CDATA[just a small town girl.. living in a lonely &quot;world&quot;...Did you not watch the series finale to the Sopranos? ;-)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a small town girl.. living in a lonely &#8220;world&#8221;&#8230;</p><p>Did you not watch the series finale to the Sopranos? ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Renato Gonçalves Toso</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64878</link> <dc:creator>Renato Gonçalves Toso</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64878</guid> <description><![CDATA[That&#039;s some sweet work although not my favorite one.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some sweet work although not my favorite one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mbutu Namubu</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64858</link> <dc:creator>Mbutu Namubu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64858</guid> <description><![CDATA[oldngrumpy...I love your username. :-)Many people consider Alois Riegl responsible for starting what is now considered the discipline of Art History. He began by identifying three main stages of representation that are generally present in all works in all time periods..1st stage - depiction of objects 2nd stage - depiction of transitory nature 3rd stage - depiction of structures of relationsThe 3rd stage is associated with all of the highest periods of art like Classical Greece and the Renaissance. Expression in art is based on the ability to metaphorically represent structures of relations (like balance, harmony, repetition, movement etc)The reason for bringing this up is that you&#039;re correct that digital has made photography more &quot;prolific.&quot; However, the majority of photographs being produced are just simple depictions of objects (persons, places, things) or depictions of transitory nature (events, gestures, appearances). It&#039;s fair to say that almost NONE of the digital images being produced today by the modern generation of digital &quot;photographers&quot; ever express the structures of relations that are necessary for the 3rd and highest stages of art.Also, the modern generation impresses me as a prideful bunch. They&#039;re pretty full of themselves when describing how technology has made it easy for them to do what &quot;old guys&quot; struggled to do. But that&#039;s simply not true. Technology has only made it easier for them to enter the 1st and 2nd stages of representation. The 3rd stage is out of their reach (and probably will always be) unless they learn to humble themselves and admit that technology gives them no advantage whatsoever when it comes to expression in high art.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oldngrumpy&#8230;I love your username. :-)</p><p>Many people consider Alois Riegl responsible for starting what is now considered the discipline of Art History. He began by identifying three main stages of representation that are generally present in all works in all time periods..</p><p>1st stage &#8211; depiction of objects<br /> 2nd stage &#8211; depiction of transitory nature<br /> 3rd stage &#8211; depiction of structures of relations</p><p>The 3rd stage is associated with all of the highest periods of art like Classical Greece and the Renaissance. Expression in art is based on the ability to metaphorically represent structures of relations (like balance, harmony, repetition, movement etc)</p><p>The reason for bringing this up is that you&#8217;re correct that digital has made photography more &#8220;prolific.&#8221; However, the majority of photographs being produced are just simple depictions of objects (persons, places, things) or depictions of transitory nature (events, gestures, appearances). It&#8217;s fair to say that almost NONE of the digital images being produced today by the modern generation of digital &#8220;photographers&#8221; ever express the structures of relations that are necessary for the 3rd and highest stages of art.</p><p>Also, the modern generation impresses me as a prideful bunch. They&#8217;re pretty full of themselves when describing how technology has made it easy for them to do what &#8220;old guys&#8221; struggled to do. But that&#8217;s simply not true. Technology has only made it easier for them to enter the 1st and 2nd stages of representation. The 3rd stage is out of their reach (and probably will always be) unless they learn to humble themselves and admit that technology gives them no advantage whatsoever when it comes to expression in high art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dave crook</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64856</link> <dc:creator>dave crook</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64856</guid> <description><![CDATA[ you can already grab images from Digital Video... however beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so what she took 100 images to get one repro image - Picasso did a hundred sketches before painting a canvas.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> you can already grab images from Digital Video&#8230; however beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so what she took 100 images to get one repro image &#8211; Picasso did a hundred sketches before painting a canvas.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oldngrumpy1</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64848</link> <dc:creator>oldngrumpy1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64848</guid> <description><![CDATA[My daughter turns out images everyday that I would have placed into my portfolio in my day. However, she shoots 4 hrs and then spends 4 days on the computer to get them. She also thinks nothing of knocking out 2000 frames for a wedding. That would have certainly not have been possible with film, even with contact proofing. Digital has made us more prolific, and that&#039;s a good thing. We are just a step away from picking our &quot;ideal&quot; images from continuous video which will not care if uncle Fred blinks because it will catch the moments on either side of that blink. I&#039;m anxious to see what that does for the more freestyle photographers and their art.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter turns out images everyday that I would have placed into my portfolio in my day. However, she shoots 4 hrs and then spends 4 days on the computer to get them. She also thinks nothing of knocking out 2000 frames for a wedding. That would have certainly not have been possible with film, even with contact proofing. Digital has made us more prolific, and that&#8217;s a good thing. We are just a step away from picking our &#8220;ideal&#8221; images from continuous video which will not care if uncle Fred blinks because it will catch the moments on either side of that blink. I&#8217;m anxious to see what that does for the more freestyle photographers and their art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nikita Sevostyanov</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64843</link> <dc:creator>Nikita Sevostyanov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64843</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wow, Chris, nice interview man :) It&#039;s not photoshop, it&#039;s something called Lightroom :) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Chris, nice interview man :) It&#8217;s not photoshop, it&#8217;s something called Lightroom :) </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NitsanSimantov</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64841</link> <dc:creator>NitsanSimantov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64841</guid> <description><![CDATA[great work ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great work</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric Filson</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64774</link> <dc:creator>Eric Filson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64774</guid> <description><![CDATA[OMG Photoshop is totally ruining photography today... /endsarcasm]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG Photoshop is totally ruining photography today&#8230; /endsarcasm</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Grant Puckett</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-intimate-work-jenny-woods-nsfw/comment-page-1#comment-64738</link> <dc:creator>Grant Puckett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=69604#comment-64738</guid> <description><![CDATA[Great words and photos Chris]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great words and photos Chris</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>