<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Wednesday Rundown 11.17.10</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Patrick Hall Admin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6501</link> <dc:creator>Patrick Hall Admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:07:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6501</guid> <description><![CDATA[I have always said, I would shoot RAW tomorrow if Nikon sold a plugin for Lightroom/Photoshop that gave me the same colors as the camera or Capture NX.  Until then I&#039;m saving my time rather than photoshopping all day.  Heck Lee is now shooting on an iPhone :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always said, I would shoot RAW tomorrow if Nikon sold a plugin for Lightroom/Photoshop that gave me the same colors as the camera or Capture NX.  Until then I&#8217;m saving my time rather than photoshopping all day.  Heck Lee is now shooting on an iPhone :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6486</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 19:11:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6486</guid> <description><![CDATA[@Stefan: I&#039;m sure that one day I will move to all Raw but right now I have a workflow that works for my business. My clients want quality pictures and I have come up with a simple way to produce them.I think that shooting jpeg will make you a better photographer but that is beside the point. I say, do whatever you can to create a better image whether that is in the camera or on the computer in post.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stefan: I&#8217;m sure that one day I will move to all Raw but right now I have a workflow that works for my business. My clients want quality pictures and I have come up with a simple way to produce them.</p><p>I think that shooting jpeg will make you a better photographer but that is beside the point. I say, do whatever you can to create a better image whether that is in the camera or on the computer in post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6481</link> <dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:02:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6481</guid> <description><![CDATA[@Lee, obviously getting great shots hasn&#039;t been a problem for you and your images prove that. I guess I just like the archival possibilities in RAW and .DNG to always be able to go back and retrieve any piece of data from those photos.I haven&#039;t deleted a digital photo in 10 years so I guess I&#039;m kind of like photographer version of a Hoarder. Please don&#039;t refer me to TLC for their next special.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lee, obviously getting great shots hasn&#8217;t been a problem for you and your images prove that. I guess I just like the archival possibilities in RAW and .DNG to always be able to go back and retrieve any piece of data from those photos.</p><p>I haven&#8217;t deleted a digital photo in 10 years so I guess I&#8217;m kind of like photographer version of a Hoarder. Please don&#8217;t refer me to TLC for their next special.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6479</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6479</guid> <description><![CDATA[@Stefan: I would never say that shooting Jpeg is better. Obviously Raw gives you way more control. At this point in my career I simply do not want more control. 99% of the time there are 3 shooters at my wedding shooting the exact same thing. If somebody messes up I have 2 cameras to fall back on. It&#039;s much faster for me to delete than tweak every image.The biggest reason though is that I actually prefer the look of Nikon jpegs to that of Adobe Raw conversion. If I used Nikon Capture to edit my Raws I could actually get the images the way I like them but so far, I can&#039;t with Adobe.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stefan: I would never say that shooting Jpeg is better. Obviously Raw gives you way more control. At this point in my career I simply do not want more control. 99% of the time there are 3 shooters at my wedding shooting the exact same thing. If somebody messes up I have 2 cameras to fall back on. It&#8217;s much faster for me to delete than tweak every image.</p><p>The biggest reason though is that I actually prefer the look of Nikon jpegs to that of Adobe Raw conversion. If I used Nikon Capture to edit my Raws I could actually get the images the way I like them but so far, I can&#8217;t with Adobe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stefan</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6478</link> <dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6478</guid> <description><![CDATA[Patrick/Lee, You both say that you prefer to shoot JPEG exclusively. May I ask why? Why not have the data that is available in RAW at your fingertips if you need it. I understand that JPEG forces you to be a better photographer, but having that control really makes sense to me if for some reason caught a moment at a wedding, but was just a bit underexposed. What real benefit is there to JPEG shooting besides memory space?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick/Lee, You both say that you prefer to shoot JPEG exclusively. May I ask why? Why not have the data that is available in RAW at your fingertips if you need it. I understand that JPEG forces you to be a better photographer, but having that control really makes sense to me if for some reason caught a moment at a wedding, but was just a bit underexposed.<br /> What real benefit is there to JPEG shooting besides memory space?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick Hall Admin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/the-wednesday-rundown-11-17-10/comment-page-1#comment-6445</link> <dc:creator>Patrick Hall Admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 05:23:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=2781#comment-6445</guid> <description><![CDATA[David&#039;s video is great if you need an intro to PS but I would kill myself if this was my wedding workflow!  Reminds me why I love shooting JPEG and not photoshopping anything except for minor tweaks.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David&#8217;s video is great if you need an intro to PS but I would kill myself if this was my wedding workflow!  Reminds me why I love shooting JPEG and not photoshopping anything except for minor tweaks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>