Comments on: The World’s Thinnest and Lightest Filters: Cokin Pure Harmonie

By: dachinster

dachinster — Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:48:00 +0000

I live on an island. There is sand and dust everywhere, especially at the beach or on savannahs. There is no way I would go without one. It isn’t to protect it from a fall, but from getting fine line scratches when it is time to clean the gear.

By: Zachariah Ishmael

Zachariah Ishmael — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:45:00 +0000

I’ve heard that Singhray is one of the best when it comes to a variable filter. I prefer either a Lee filter system or B+W filters over a variable system for clarity and color reasons though.

By: Datco

Datco — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:00 +0000

UV filters are 90% useless. The only time I use them is when the camera is mounted on a moving platform like a car for a video shoot.

The front element of the lens is the cheapest and easiest to replace. The marginal loss in performance isn’t worth the marginal chance of damage to the cheapest part of a lens.

By: Mark Dunlap

Mark Dunlap — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:21:00 +0000

My question is if anyone has the variable nd filter and what their opinion is. There is quite a range of prices and quality in variable nd filters and I’ve been trying to settle on one particular brand in the mid-price range to use for both still and video work.

By: John MacLean Photography

John MacLean Photography — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:17:00 +0000

I’ve never used a protection filter. Waste of money IMO.

By: waterengineer

waterengineer — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:09:00 +0000

What does anyone know about the color cast of the ND filters?

By: amanduca

amanduca — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:05:00 +0000

I did similar tests as well. Although I did come to the same conclusion as you, I also noticed a 1.5pt unsharp mask set to about 25 takes care of the difference for most high quality B&W filters and can be stacked on top of whatever regular sharpening you already do in post. In of story, even on jobs where sharpness is of key importance, it still doesn’t make enough of an difference. Flare? That’s a different story and you just gotta roll with it on that, sometimes it makes a huge difference, other times it doesn’t effect anything.

By: Tyler Rippel

Tyler Rippel — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:02:00 +0000

I would tend to agree. I also believe Scott Bourne is a big proponent of plastic hoods vs. UV filters, and mentioned that he has also seen more lens scratches because of a UV shattering than what you’d think.

By: Jens Marklund

Jens Marklund — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:20:00 +0000

Not to start a debate, but I feel like way too many people use UV filters. I stopped using them a while back, and I am not going back. The classical argument being that another piece of glass will only make the lens worse (though protecting the front element).

I’ve done sharpness “tests” with and without filters (even B+W ones) and have noticed quite the difference in sharpness at 100% (and sometimes flare handling). Now I only use a UV filter when going to the beach, or on my 50 mm (cause it’s a pain to clean otherwise). I also usually use a hood, so the one time I dropped a lens – the hood just flew off and the lens was fine. I’ve had one lens at work that actually had a B+W filter on it when dropped, and it bent – so it’s now impossible to remove from the filter thread.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:42:00 +0000

Do they feel sturdy to you? The one nice thing about the B+W brass rings are that they feel incredibly solid. And that’s one small thing I worry about. But I assume they’re not messing a round with a solid (but not outrageous) price…is that true?