Victoria’s Secret Models Pre-Angel-Era

Originals
Categories
Gear
Forum
Picture of the Day
Contests
More
- FS Gear Guide
- Fstoppers T-shirts

Victoria’s Secret Models Pre-Angel-Era

Coined as the “Pre-Angel Era”, Victoria’s Secret was quite modest compared to today’s Angels. Besides the furry slippers, unusual carpet and sleeping dog, there is a noticeable difference between these images and what graces the covers of their current catalogs. Naturally, editing skills have improved tremendously but it’s crazy to think how far this brand has come since the 70′s. Now we’re questioning whether the editing is too aggressive. Either way, I think these images probably appealed to both sexes during those years just like they do today.

article 2197548 14D0B8C0000005DC 31 634x742 Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

article 2197548 14D0B870000005DC 321 634x511 Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

article 2197548 14D07FE5000005DC 78 634x524 Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

article 2197548 14D07FEE000005DC 523 634x776 Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

Screen shot 2012 09 08 at 4.59.54 PM Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

Screen shot 2012 09 08 at 5.00.18 PM Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

Screen shot 2012 09 08 at 5.00.31 PM Victorias Secret Models Pre Angel Era

Editorial

Fashion

Lifestyle

Location

Pictures

Portraits

Post Production

« The Hubble Telescope Shows Galaxies 13.2 Billion Years Old

How Lightroom 4 Could Have Saved a Wedding Flash Misfire »

Chris Helton
omg were these REALLY VS? And pro? These are like “hey uncle Joe, here’s a camera, take some pictures of these girl”
brandnew
Just goes to show how ‘normal’ models used to be!
http://www.facebook.com/michael.miller.5815 Michael Miller
Kinda looks perverted with the WAY the images look. The color tones are so pervy looking, like 1970′s Playboy. I find the see through bra amusing, and the horrible facial expressions. These all look like the older woman you work with that invites you over for a drink and she comes out with a silk robe on, she drinks scotch, and she doesn’t know that NO MEANS NO!
Donavan Whyte
not kinda pervy, really pervy its the 70′s baby…so glad i was not born then!
http://www.bertmclendon.com Bert McLendon
I see Nipple in 50% of these pics… Is there Nipples showing in 50% of the current pics? Maybe I’m looking in the wrong place or my monthly magazine is the “PG” rated version. Damn you Pasties inventor!
http://www.facebook.com/bruno.inacio.940 Bruno Inácio
Uau!
For those o think that is horrible/ out of mood, just check some screenshots os bondgirls on 007 old school movies!
Beautiful post!
http://twitter.com/nathanng Nathan Ng
at least give a hat tip to retro space for digging these up last year.
LeonardoBaldenegro
More technical aspects have to mention photographically speaking I find interesting as comments are directed to the nipples of models, like that’s the important thing, I find it amazing sometimes how it affects that aspect aside what is really important see the side of the picture and double moral aspects.
http://www.facebook.com/ErrantWanderlust Tim Foster
First, if you’re going to post on a photography blog, you should learn what “editing” means. Second, there’s no nipples in the modern catalogs, so these are arguably less modest.
http://profile.yahoo.com/MN3TBVJYP7NQFORXWG4TESVR4I Sal
What does being born in the 70s have to do with being a perv, you ignorant fuck!