<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Video] An MIT Lab Figures Out How To Shoot 1 Trillion Frames Per Second</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30526</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30526</guid> <description><![CDATA[Okay, but now explain the CFL bulb which appears to have a blacklight coating. How does that play into this? Surely that turns up the geek factor to 11. :) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but now explain the CFL bulb which appears to have a blacklight coating. How does that play into this? Surely that turns up the geek factor to 11. :) </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30527</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30527</guid> <description><![CDATA[Okay, but now explain the CFL bulb which appears to have a blacklight coating. How does that play into this? Surely that turns up the geek factor to 11. :) ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, but now explain the CFL bulb which appears to have a blacklight coating. How does that play into this? Surely that turns up the geek factor to 11. :) </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30521</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30521</guid> <description><![CDATA[Taking what Louis said one step further, it would be another challenge all by itself to actually emit a single photon in order to photograph such. Photons generally travel in packs, so to speak. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking what Louis said one step further, it would be another challenge all by itself to actually emit a single photon in order to photograph such. Photons generally travel in packs, so to speak. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30522</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30522</guid> <description><![CDATA[Taking what Louis said one step further, it would be another challenge all by itself to actually emit a single photon in order to photograph such. Photons generally travel in packs, so to speak. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking what Louis said one step further, it would be another challenge all by itself to actually emit a single photon in order to photograph such. Photons generally travel in packs, so to speak. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30519</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30519</guid> <description><![CDATA[That was EXACTLY my reaction! The guy with the titanium-sapphire laser and &quot;homebrew&quot; 500 sensor array camera thinks my studio lights are expensive. Riiight. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was EXACTLY my reaction! The guy with the titanium-sapphire laser and &#8220;homebrew&#8221; 500 sensor array camera thinks my studio lights are expensive. Riiight. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30520</link> <dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30520</guid> <description><![CDATA[That was EXACTLY my reaction! The guy with the titanium-sapphire laser and &quot;homebrew&quot; 500 sensor array camera thinks my studio lights are expensive. Riiight. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was EXACTLY my reaction! The guy with the titanium-sapphire laser and &#8220;homebrew&#8221; 500 sensor array camera thinks my studio lights are expensive. Riiight. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30518</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30518</guid> <description><![CDATA[This camera doesn&#039;t actually see individual photons, it can record motion at the speed of light though. As he says in the beginning of the video, they &quot;can see photons or particles of light moving through space&quot;. The plural was the important part here. Their light source, a laser, is actually very powerful. What were seeing is a short pulse of light traveling, not a single photon. Actually, with this type of set up, I don&#039;t think they would be able to see a single photon other than if it was pointed straight at the lens.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streak_cameraBasically, the light hits a photosensor (kind of like a solar cell), gets converted to electricity. That electrical signal goes to a cathode ray tube, like an old tv, and makes a dot on a phosphorus screen. That screen is then recorded by a ccd sensor, just like in a standard ccd sensor like in a standard camera as the phosphor will glow for a couple of seconds. I&#039;m guessing their 500 sensors refer to 500 lines and they adjust the cathode ray tube to move at 1-trillionth of a second in order to get all the lines on the phosphor screen, just like an old tv shoots a beam across the surface of the screen. But instead the screen is connected to a ccd sensor to see where the light hits. As they were saying, the camera shoots only a video of a line. So the resulting still image wouldn&#039;t make much sense as you would have 500 lines at 500 different time. That&#039;s what they call a 2D image, in the sense that a line is one dimension and time is the other. They must tilt a mirror to get all the lines that would make up a still image. The corresponding lines at the corresponding times are put together to make up the full video]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera doesn&#8217;t actually see individual photons, it can record motion at the speed of light though. As he says in the beginning of the video, they &#8220;can see photons or particles of light moving through space&#8221;. The plural was the important part here. Their light source, a laser, is actually very powerful. What were seeing is a short pulse of light traveling, not a single photon. Actually, with this type of set up, I don&#8217;t think they would be able to see a single photon other than if it was pointed straight at the lens.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streak_camera" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streak_camera</a></p><p>Basically, the light hits a photosensor (kind of like a solar cell), gets converted to electricity. That electrical signal goes to a cathode ray tube, like an old tv, and makes a dot on a phosphorus screen. That screen is then recorded by a ccd sensor, just like in a standard ccd sensor like in a standard camera as the phosphor will glow for a couple of seconds. I&#8217;m guessing their 500 sensors refer to 500 lines and they adjust the cathode ray tube to move at 1-trillionth of a second in order to get all the lines on the phosphor screen, just like an old tv shoots a beam across the surface of the screen. But instead the screen is connected to a ccd sensor to see where the light hits. </p><p>As they were saying, the camera shoots only a video of a line. So the resulting still image wouldn&#8217;t make much sense as you would have 500 lines at 500 different time. That&#8217;s what they call a 2D image, in the sense that a line is one dimension and time is the other. They must tilt a mirror to get all the lines that would make up a still image. The corresponding lines at the corresponding times are put together to make up the full video</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: William Smith</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30514</link> <dc:creator>William Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30514</guid> <description><![CDATA[He says their camera only records in one dimension (??) and that they have to rotate a mirror to process the entire object.  That doesn&#039;t make sense as every frame seems to be in 2D.   It also sounds like they&#039;re compiling a lot of different photos as the laser moves across the object.  How fast does that mirror rotate?  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He says their camera only records in one dimension (??) and that they have to rotate a mirror to process the entire object.  That doesn&#8217;t make sense as every frame seems to be in 2D.   It also sounds like they&#8217;re compiling a lot of different photos as the laser moves across the object.  How fast does that mirror rotate?  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sven Ratzel</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30509</link> <dc:creator>Sven Ratzel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30509</guid> <description><![CDATA[This is a complete hoax! I can&#039;t belive this, that so many are taking this for real. It&#039;s way too little light (photons) to capture and the data produced would be so gigantic, that no computer could handle it. They just put a beam of light through a slit and ran it over the scene... I ashames me, that so many people believe this!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a complete hoax! I can&#8217;t belive this, that so many are taking this for real. It&#8217;s way too little light (photons) to capture and the data produced would be so gigantic, that no computer could handle it. They just put a beam of light through a slit and ran it over the scene&#8230; I ashames me, that so many people believe this!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-an-mit-lab-figures-out-how-to-shoot-1-trillion-frames-per-second/comment-page-1#comment-30507</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=17089#comment-30507</guid> <description><![CDATA[Might be off here but I have a feeling that camera might be a little more expensive than my Elinchroms... :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might be off here but I have a feeling that camera might be a little more expensive than my Elinchroms&#8230; :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>