<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: [Video] Canon 5DM3 Video Beat By Panasonic GH2?</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Joseph Bolus</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-42234</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Bolus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-42234</guid> <description><![CDATA[http://www.eoshd.com/content/8114/audience-reaction-to-revenge-of-the-great-camera-shootout-puts-gh2-in-3rd-place-behind-alexa-and-f65 &quot;Very Crappy&quot; you say?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eoshd.com/content/8114/audience-reaction-to-revenge-of-the-great-camera-shootout-puts-gh2-in-3rd-place-behind-alexa-and-f65" rel="nofollow">http://www.eoshd.com/content/8114/audience-reaction-to-revenge-of-the-great-camera-shootout-puts-gh2-in-3rd-place-behind-alexa-and-f65</a><br /> &#8220;Very Crappy&#8221; you say?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: A&#38;N Studio</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36573</link> <dc:creator>A&#38;N Studio</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36573</guid> <description><![CDATA[Technical  progress stopped... I also want to see a video comparison between Nikon and Canon.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technical  progress stopped&#8230;<br /> I also want to see a video comparison between Nikon and Canon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CrustyJuggler66</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36561</link> <dc:creator>CrustyJuggler66</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36561</guid> <description><![CDATA[Granted its not something you should do but it doesn&#039;t detract from the point. Care to add something with a little more substance and less condescension?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Granted its not something you should do but it doesn&#8217;t detract from the point. Care to add something with a little more substance and less condescension?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph Bolus</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36538</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Bolus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36538</guid> <description><![CDATA[Ironic... I stopped reading at &quot;raise the sharpness level...&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic&#8230; I stopped reading at &#8220;raise the sharpness level&#8230;&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Justinflynn</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36532</link> <dc:creator>Justinflynn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36532</guid> <description><![CDATA[ Yeah I agree that it&#039;s not the greatest test but I think my point (which I did not make clearly) was that the mark III is a much more well rounded piece of equipment with really really handy features that come stock with it (not having to hack it). And now with the sharpen workaroudn I believe we have an extremely great tool at our disposal.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yeah I agree that it&#8217;s not the greatest test but I think my point (which I did<br /> not make clearly) was that the mark III is a much more well rounded piece of<br /> equipment with really really handy features that come stock with it (not having<br /> to hack it). And now with the sharpen workaroudn I believe we have an extremely<br /> great tool at our disposal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CrustyJuggler66</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36515</link> <dc:creator>CrustyJuggler66</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36515</guid> <description><![CDATA[Just raise the sharpness levels on a custom preset in camera.  I do this all the time as all the Canon picture style presets are set to the &#039;0&#039; end of 0-7.  All this proves is Panasonic uses a higher level by default and bloggers simply forego any ounce of common sense and objectivity.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just raise the sharpness levels on a custom preset in camera.  I do this all the time as all the Canon picture style presets are set to the &#8217;0&#8242; end of 0-7.  All this proves is Panasonic uses a higher level by default and bloggers simply forego any ounce of common sense and objectivity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: President_Putin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36506</link> <dc:creator>President_Putin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36506</guid> <description><![CDATA[My client does not care which camera appears sharper in some shots. All they care about is the overall look and Canon wins here hands down. Who cares really if its tiny bit sharper? Video still looks very crappy on Panasonic. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My client does not care which camera appears sharper in some shots. All they care about is the overall look and Canon wins here hands down. </p><p>Who cares really if its tiny bit sharper? Video still looks very crappy on Panasonic. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: President_Putin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36505</link> <dc:creator>President_Putin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36505</guid> <description><![CDATA[exactly this ^ My client does not care which camera appears sharper the overall look is what sells. ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly this ^ My client does not care which camera appears sharper the overall look is what sells. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: President_Putin</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36503</link> <dc:creator>President_Putin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36503</guid> <description><![CDATA[I actually liked MKIII footage more.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually liked MKIII footage more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SEAN SHIMMEL</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/video-canon-5dm3-video-beat-by-panasonic-gh2/comment-page-1#comment-36497</link> <dc:creator>SEAN SHIMMEL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=30439#comment-36497</guid> <description><![CDATA[Recommendation:Start a new article reviewing not the equipment, but... the end viewer (NOT counting fellow photographers).Result? While I wish they would, no one will care or notice the differences. (again, fellow photographers and tech peeps don&#039;t count)Instead they&#039;ll say things like:&quot;Can you delete that part? I hate my double chin!&quot; &quot;Look at that lake! Reminds me of our vacation last year in Canada.&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommendation:</p><p>Start a new article reviewing not the equipment, but&#8230; the end viewer (NOT counting fellow photographers).</p><p>Result? </p><p>While I wish they would, no one will care or notice the differences. (again, fellow photographers and tech peeps don&#8217;t count)</p><p>Instead they&#8217;ll say things like:</p><p>&#8220;Can you delete that part? I hate my double chin!&#8221;<br /> &#8220;Look at that lake! Reminds me of our vacation last year in Canada.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>