Comments on: [Video] This Video Was Created Entirely In Photoshop! (Yes, Video)

By: Chaz Westwood

Chaz Westwood — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:18:00 +0000

Two things struck me when I watched this….

ONE: ”That model has a strange shaped face”

and

TWO: “Ohhhh, that’s what happened to Drew Barrymore’s slightly less attractive sister.”

By: Satya Varghese Mac

Satya Varghese Mac — Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:16:00 +0000

This will probably be great for photographers doing a bit of dslr video like weddings but Adobe would be really dumb to completely replace AE and Premiere.

By: Alexandru Vasile

Alexandru Vasile — Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:26:00 +0000

I do not see the use for that. I am a designer, I use all the Adobe products and many more. I do not think that Photoshop is meant to do that. It is a good marketing idea, because, if you want to process only photos, you would pay for a all in one that is more expensive product than a photo editing program. I do not think that “purpose software” should be for everybody. It is like the last version of Final Cut. It looks like a better iMovie. All in one is for home usage, for social networking. Professionals use “purpose software” for everything. In my work, I use for a finished product 5 different software and i do not mind because they do the job right. I did not see a allinone that does everything right.

By: Stanislav Stepanov

Stanislav Stepanov — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:21:00 +0000

I think Photoshop should be PHOTOshop, but not VIDEOshop or ALLINONEshop. I don’t like huge programs overloaded with extra fitures I don’t need. May be some minor video fitures will be good. But the good professional video editing tool should remain the separate program.

By: Julian Jones

Julian Jones — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:12:00 +0000

I can already do that in the given version of Photoshop and export to video, the only drawback is no audio timeline, unless one is doing a slideshow. Also, Photoshop doesn’t seem to like video at 4k or larger, i.e. original size timelapse, of which I would use after effects. But I have been thinking how cool it would be to have the same layout and user-bility as PS. Can’t wait to see what they create.

By: Howell, Photography

Howell, Photography — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:54:00 +0000

Looks like it can cut, fade, key, pip and filter… and presumably mix audio. What more could you ask for?

By: Iulian Gospodin

Iulian Gospodin — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:52:00 +0000

I think this is a good idea, even better if Adobe should consider to release a version of their software of PS, After Effects etc, for Linux OS too.

By: Tim Shirey

Tim Shirey — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:47:00 +0000

custom workspaces–
Adobe has already laid a good foundation to include video, 3D, and 2D images in one program without looking cluttered, confusing or bloated. They give the option of jumping between customized workspaces.
For example, when editing images, I ONLY see the palettes I need at that stage, position them on the screen where I want, all relating to what I’m doing and how I work. When jumping to the video editing, I can switch to another custom workspace, then back. But all having that familiar feel of PS and access to all the PS benefits.

By: yahoo-5V4Q65V4ZHUBA6QSVKCS3NC5SQ

yahoo-5V4Q65V4ZHUBA6QSVKCS3NC5SQ — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:08:00 +0000

I don’t mind Premiere, but I’d definitely be down if Adobe made it more Photoshop-like in terms of how you approach the editing. Maybe this’ll be it!

By: Levy Moroshan

Levy Moroshan — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:45:00 +0000

They should have spent a little more time retouching the model…