<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wacom Announces Two New Cintiq Interactive Pen Displays</title> <atom:link href="http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen</link> <description>Video Blog for Creative Professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Scott Rose</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45227</link> <dc:creator>Scott Rose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45227</guid> <description><![CDATA[I think anyone going with the new 22d has a better option than the 24&#039;s as they can always attach an ergotron arm (or similar product) for awesome rotation and placement of the display. The 24 (and new 24D) just seems too bulky and clunky even though the attached base gives you some vertical movement.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think anyone going with the new 22d has a better option than the 24&#8242;s as they can always attach an ergotron arm (or similar product) for awesome rotation and placement of the display. The 24 (and new 24D) just seems too bulky and clunky even though the attached base gives you some vertical movement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fir Rahman</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45136</link> <dc:creator>Fir Rahman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45136</guid> <description><![CDATA[Wow, this is awesome.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is awesome. </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stan Rogers</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45079</link> <dc:creator>Stan Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45079</guid> <description><![CDATA[As far as I am concerned, this is a big step backwards from the existing 21-incher. I&#039;m sure the actual monitor is lovely and everything, but the rotation has been severley limited compared to the ±180° pivot of the older unit. I don&#039;t know about you guys, but I have just over 90° of smooth curve in a drawing stroke, and curves that work with the pivot point of my wrist work a lot better than those that go the other way. The old monitor aspect ratio might seem too &quot;square&quot; to some people when you look at it as just a monitor, but as a working surface it permitted a much larger range of movement—and that&#039;s kinda the whole point of one of these things, isn&#039;t it?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I am concerned, this is a big step backwards from the existing 21-incher. I&#8217;m sure the actual monitor is lovely and everything, but the rotation has been severley limited compared to the ±180° pivot of the older unit. I don&#8217;t know about you guys, but I have just over 90° of smooth curve in a drawing stroke, and curves that work with the pivot point of my wrist work a lot better than those that go the other way. The old monitor aspect ratio might seem too &#8220;square&#8221; to some people when you look at it as just a monitor, but as a working surface it permitted a much larger range of movement—and that&#8217;s kinda the whole point of one of these things, isn&#8217;t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kurnikoff</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45077</link> <dc:creator>kurnikoff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45077</guid> <description><![CDATA[am I the only one surprised with its weight? 26kg with a stand (from official website)? I guess its for stabilization etc but 26kg?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am I the only one surprised with its weight? 26kg with a stand (from official website)? I guess its for stabilization etc but 26kg?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gina Spiroff Miller</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45072</link> <dc:creator>Gina Spiroff Miller</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45072</guid> <description><![CDATA[oh my goodness! It would be a Dream come true to own the touch one! Maybe I should play the lottery. ;)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my goodness! It would be a Dream come true to own the touch one! Maybe I should play the lottery. ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike Burton</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45067</link> <dc:creator>Mike Burton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45067</guid> <description><![CDATA[sigh, i wish....time for an FStoppers comp i reckon!!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sigh, i wish&#8230;.time for an FStoppers comp i reckon!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jaron Schneider</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45065</link> <dc:creator>Jaron Schneider</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45065</guid> <description><![CDATA[With the widescreen one, Wacom said that editing video might be a good option too. I&#039;d be interested in trying that.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the widescreen one, Wacom said that editing video might be a good option too. I&#8217;d be interested in trying that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Björn Leek</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45062</link> <dc:creator>Björn Leek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45062</guid> <description><![CDATA[Awesome!!!!!!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JimmySchaefer</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45061</link> <dc:creator>JimmySchaefer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45061</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wish!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://fstoppers.com/wacom-announces-the-new-cintiq-touch-widescreen/comment-page-1#comment-45060</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://fstoppers.com/?p=41217#comment-45060</guid> <description><![CDATA[Those look great, would love to be able to edit photos on one of those.  ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those look great, would love to be able to edit photos on one of those.  </p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>