Critique the Community: Submit Your Best Architecture Photographs Here

Critique the Community: Submit Your Best Architecture Photographs Here

In this next episode of Critique the Community, we'll be sitting down with Architectural Photographer, Mike Kelley. Mike is best known for his incredible light painting methods. In less than 5 years of owning a camera, he has gone from knowing very little about photography to shooting National Ad Campaigns for the Architecture industry. If you want Mike and us to consider your image for this episode, leave a link to your image within the community and we will give you our honest opinion.  

The internet can be a cruel and cut throat place for photographers. For some reason photographers are often extremely negative and cynical when looking at the work of their peers.  Most photographers overwhelmingly say that they would like others to "C&C" their work, yet the conversation can often times become less than inspiring and often down right depressing.  Our hope with this new segment called Critique the Community is that Lee and I can offer a fair yet encouraging commentary on some of the images found in the Fstoppers Community.

 

The Fstoppers Community Rating System

If you have an Fstoppers account, you are able to create your own profile and portfolio directly within the Fstoppers Community.  Once you have a portfolio uploaded, you can browse images in the community and rate the photos of your peers.  Even though art is usually a fairly subjective matter, we wanted to create a rating system that was as objective and unbiased as possible.  This way if one of your images has been rated 50 times and has received an average rating of 2 stars, you could feel confident that maybe that particular image is not up to par.  Below is a simple chart explaining the Fstoppers Community Rating System. 

1 Star - The Snapshot

1 Star ratings are limited to snap shots only. Snap shots are usually taken to document a time or location but little to no thought has gone into the creation of the image. If an image has been "lit" with external light (besides a direct on camera flash) it is at least a 2 star picture. The majority of 1 star images have had no post production work done to them but do often have an "instagram style" filter added to them. The average person these days snaps 1 star images every single day with their smart phones. Most 1 star images that pop up on sites like ours are images of flowers, pets, landscapes, sunsets, objects around a house, etc. If you read Fstoppers, you should not be sharing 1 star images for any reason. 

2 Stars - Needs Work:

All images, besides maybe 5 star images, always have room for improvement but 2 star images "need work" before they should be included in your portfolio. As photographers we are snapping thousands of images per year but only a few of those images should ever be shared or put into our portfolio. A photographer who has taken a 2 star image has put some thought into the composition, exposure, and post production but for some reason has missed the mark. 2 star images should not be in the portfolio of a full time professional photographer, and amateur photographers should strive for something better. Even complete amateurs who don't understand photography at all are capable of taking 2 star images from time to time. 

3 Stars - Solid:

A 3 star image is an all around good image. The photographer has a solid understanding of the basics; composition, color, focus, subject matter, and post production. A 3 star image is "good" but it's not great. Most part-time professional photographers have mostly 3 star images in their portfolios. Usually a level 3 image would have been rated 4 stars if it had been shot in a better location, or with a better model showing a better expressions, or there was better post production. A photographer capable of taking a 3 star image is capable of taking 4 and 5 star images if they would simply pay more attention to the details. 

4 Stars - Excellent:

4 star images are fantastic. In most cases, 4 star images have a certain style to them that links them directly to their creator. 4 star images usually require planning and attention to extreme detail. It's almost impossible to shoot a 4 star image by getting lucky. 4 star images have almost flawless conception, composition, lighting, subject matter, and post production. If you have any 4 star images in your portfolio you should be very proud of yourself.

5 Stars - World Class:

5 star images are flawless and unforgettable. The amount of time, energy, and talent that goes into the average 5 star image is staggering. In many cases these pictures require a team to produce including a professional retoucher. The concept, lighting, subject, location, and post production on these images has to be perfect. In some cases the jump from 4 to 5 stars may be as simple as changing the unknown model in the picture with a celebrity or bringing in a set designer or stylist to make the image slightly better. Although there are always exceptions, most 5 star images take days, if not weeks or months to produce.

 

Strengthening Your Own Portfolio

Even with our objective rating system, people are going to disagree with what they like because ultimately art is still a matter of opinion.  However, I believe once an image has been rated over 25 times it will have a rating that is pretty fair and honest (We hope to deter trolls by giving negative Karma points when a vote is more than 1 star away from the community average).  If one of your images in your own portfolio is rated lower than what you personally feel it should be rated, I'd urge you to try to look at the image from an unbiased angle.  Step back, erase your memory of the photoshoot itself, and try to imagine an art buyer, stock agency, potential client or local gallery as they decided if they wanted to invest in your services.  Would your image make the cut?

Lee and I are not the greatest photographers in the world.  There are many many genres of photography that we have not been successful in or in many cases have not even attempted in our careers.  However I believe we have a pretty good idea of what works and what doesn't in terms of commercial viability.  Not every image is meant to sell or book you work, and that is okay!  Snapshots and sentimental images are great and most definitely have a purpose.  Hopefully our insight and critiques can help you decide what is and isn't worth putting in your own public portfolio.  I hope these video critiques can help you see beyond the technical and personal elements that make up an image and begin looking at your own work in a new light.    

Log in or register to post comments

117 Comments

Previous comments

My first attempt for a twilight shot, inspired by Mike Kelley's techniques:
https://fstoppers.com/photo/53104

Ryan Laing's picture

Hi Mike and guys,

Here is a wee photograph of a cottage I shot up in the North of Scotland during Christmas...

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53286

Be nice to get some feed back and cheers for doing this! :)

I realize this is kind of last minute, but I have to try!

https://fstoppers.com/user/42792/portfolio

Scott Gibson's picture

Hi folks,

Much appreciate you guys for doing this. I have chosen a more natural looking shot for this one...

Here is my entry,

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53287

Thanks,

Scott

Jimmy Boko's picture

Hiya Guys,

This was a very challenging shot as the roof was very low and very little interior lighting. Hopefully you can give me some advice on this shot as I wasn't completely happy with the final result...

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53292

Cheers,

Jimmy

Christopher Walker's picture

Hiya,

Here is my before and after image of a Restaurant I shot a few months ago. The client was after a moody atmosphere. I am interested to here your thoughts.

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53294

P.s apoligies for posting the image twice, it wouldn't let me delete the top image for some reason!?
Thanks :)

Rob Nitsch's picture

Here is a rental cottage living room I shot back on Cape Cod. I would love a critique.
https://fstoppers.com/photo/53204

Aaron Zaccardelli's picture

Hiya Mike and Fstoppers peeps,

Happy New Year too you all!

Hope I have made this in time - just literally finished the edit just now. I managed to get this shot just before the decorations were taken down after an early rise at 5am. It is the most elaborately decorated bars in my city of Edinburgh which was originally built in 1775 as a Physicians hall. It threw quite a few different challenges one main problem being the various different light intensities. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on this from you guys.Please feel free to be as critical as you like ;)

Cheers,

Aaron (Del Tron)

Jerome Courtial's picture

Hi guys, I've taken Mike's course just as it came out about a year ago, would be good to see if I've learned it properly! I've uploaded 4 pictures in my portfolio for review, but if it has to be the one, it's that one attached.
https://fstoppers.com/user/42677/portfolio

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53222

David Dickinson's picture

Hi all, this is the Graduate Centre London Metropolitan University by Daniel Libeskind Architects. Hope you guys like it and give me some tasty feedback to chew on! The post production was quite time consuming but I was adamant for a clean final image. Have I gone too far or missed anything out? Thanks :) https://fstoppers.com/photo/53231

Purnesh Dev Nikhanj's picture

Hey! Thanks for this wonderful opportunity. This my entry for the critique.
https://fstoppers.com/photo/53236

And if you find time for critiquing my portfolio it would be great. Thanks! :)

Aloha friends,

let me know what you think of my photography. I just got an Tilt Shift lens and was playing around with it in Shanghai.

fstoppers.com/user/42926/portfolio

Alex Shaw's picture

Here's a shot of the library on campus

Kim Smith's picture

Here's one I'm proud of. Please let me know how I can improve.
http://www.kimsmithphoto.com/-/portfolios/interiors

Kim Smith's picture

Here's one I know needs improvement, but I'm curious how. It was a gloomy day outside. And I only have a Paul C Buff Einstein and a bunch of speed lights. I can't yet afford mega lights. I did as much light painting as I could. (image on right, raw image on left) So how do I make the view through the windows look good without making it HDR-ish?? I welcome suggestions
http://www.kimsmithphoto.com/-/portfolios/interiors

Christian Möhrle's picture

Not quite sure if I'm to late for submission and if my shot fits the architecture niche, but I give it a try:

https://fstoppers.com/photo/53005

Magdalena Lojewska's picture

Hi, i uploaded architecture photos to my profile, Let me know what you think, thanks:) :

https://fstoppers.com/user/43316/portfolio

Legion of Honor, San Francisco, CA.

Michael Sjogren's picture

Hi guys. Not sure if it's too late to submit photos but here is a twilight shot I did for a property management company using @Mike Kelley 's technique from the FStopper's "Where Art Meets Architecture" tutorial.
https://fstoppers.com/photo/55662

My submission