The Most Important Composition Rule That Is Too Often Ignored

Composition is confusing at first, then it appears incredibly easy. But, once the basics have been mastered, the composition rabbit hole goes much deeper.

I remember when I first started learning about composition. I had no background in the arts or art history and knew no photographers or artists. So, the information was being delivered to me without a foundation. Despite how long ago that was, I remember how I felt: confused. It wasn't that the rules were difficult to understand, or the compositions of people's photos were hard to spot once you knew some of the most common rules, like the Rule of Thirds. My problem was how you ever shot something which was abiding by these rules, and how did you know which to choose? I remember trying to force compositions for every shot I took and find it deeply unsatisfying.

Then, gradually I learned to see the world with grids on my eyes, and the whole concept felt simple and easily applied. The issue is, if you try to stick rigidly to these rules, you're missing a few things. Firstly, you're missing the many creative compositions that don't perfectly map to rules, and those can often separate images from the pack. But moreover, you're often neglecting the whole point of these compositional rules in the first place: keeping people looking at your image.

In this video, Karl Taylor goes through what he believes is the most important aspect of composition.

Rob Baggs's picture

Robert K Baggs is a professional portrait and commercial photographer, educator, and consultant from England. Robert has a First-Class degree in Philosophy and a Master's by Research. In 2015 Robert's work on plagiarism in photography was published as part of several universities' photography degree syllabuses.

Log in or register to post comments
9 Comments

The most important rule of composition is to have a Para 222, Satellite Staro and monitor EIZO in the frame even when you don't need them. Right, Karl? ;)

got 'em

Ah, but they are placed at the edges of the frame to trap you inside the image. Your eye keeps enviously wandering to the perimeter of the composition, but is forced back to the subject in such a way that there's no escape. Ever!

How is this a problem though?

So the most important composition rule is using the rules about composition that you already know?

🤦🏼‍♂️

And THAT folks. Is how you package an ad.

According to Joel Meyerowitz: "Composition is what you put in a photograph. If you want an interesting photograph, put interesting things in it." Who am I to argue? I always thought rules of composition were BS in any case. Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, Dian Arbus also thought little of them and ignored them.

The most important rule of composition is . . .

. . . disregard all of the rules.