Canon RF 85mm f/1.2L Versus EF 85mm f/1.2L II: Which Is Better?

Portrait photographers who have shot with the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II will probably tell you about how wonderful that lens is. Having this particular focal length with such a wide aperture produces very unique and beautiful results. The new RF mount lens looks to take the crown for the best portrait lens, however. 

A recent video from Matt Granger compares the two flagship 85mm lenses from Canon. Both of these lenses come with quite hefty price tags. The EF mount is currently priced at $1,849, which is incredibly steep, especially when you consider the age of this lens. If that sounds bad enough, you may want to look away from the price of the RF mount 85mm f/1.2L lens, because that is currently priced at an astounding $2,699. The new RF mount lens is much larger than the older EF mount version; however, surprisingly, it doesn't actually weight much more. This is one of the things I noticed when I shot with the EF mount lens: it's small but very dense. The major issue with the older 85mm lens was that although it produced some of the best-looking bokeh, it wasn't the sharpest lens when shot wide open, not to mention the terrible chromatic aberrations. The RF mount lens seems like a huge improvement.

Check out the full video linked above to see how they compare to one another and don't forget to download the files directly from Granger's website.

Log in or register to post comments


Jonathan Brady's picture

No need to watch the video, the RF version is an improvement in every conceivable way except for price and size.

cameramanDop Shanghai Hong Kong's picture

Thanks, I was hoping the article will sum up, but no.
What useless post. I can't watch videos, so reading is what I'm expecting going here. my mistake, it's now a Youtube portal only.

Usman Dawood's picture

The article is highlighting the video. It would be less than of me to put the content in the article when Matt has put so much effort into producing the video. Watch it when you can because his videos are excellent and worth spending time on.

Farhad Farajov's picture

Usually Matt produces good videos, but this one is definitely not one of those.

Ian Goss's picture

“… very unique …”? No such thing.

Alexander Yakimov's picture

It is a nice demonstration of good ol' glass. New is a bit better, but not radically better.

Tony Clark's picture

Didn’t bother watching the video because a 85LII was replaced by the 85L/IS more than two years ago.

Usman Dawood's picture

The 85mm IS is an f/1.4 lens and was not a replacement. Even the price points are different with both f/1.2 lenses sitting with higher prices.

Alexander Yakimov's picture

1.4 has a better focusing speed.

Jonathan Brady's picture

True. Everyone knows f/1.4 = f/1.2

Mark Webb's picture

I compared four 85mm lenses here, and kept all the settings identical. The 1.4 lenses were brightened by .03 stops in LR. RF takes the cake in every regard if you ask me. Look at the edges of the sidewalk and the the fence on the left. It's sharper yet smoother than any of the others. Also nothing to show CA here but that's one of the main benefits as well.

In order: EF 85mm 1.2L II, EF 85mm 1.4L IS, Sigma 85mm Art, RF85mm 1.2

Usman Dawood's picture

You know I didn't think I would but I prefer the EF 85mm f/1.2II over the look of the other lenses. I own the sigma and love that lens but in the comparison above the EF Canon lens looks really good.

Black Z Eddie .'s picture

I like the 4th, RF. The bokeh is so much smoother.

Mark Webb's picture

And then some wide open wedding shots with the RF

Love seeing real world real use examples. Great shots

Eric Crudup's picture

I like the rendering of the EF better. If the autofocus wasn't so slow I'd buy it over the RF for my EOS R.