Is the Leica Q the Best Camera for Street Photography — and a Bargain?

Released in June 2015, the Leica Q (Type 116) is a full frame, fixed-lens camera ideal for street photography. Thanks to the arrival of the Q2 in March last year, there’s now a fair few original Qs available to pick up secondhand approaching half of its launch price. Could it be the perfect camera for street photography?

As explained by street photographer Shane Taylor of Framelines, the Summilux 28mm f/1.7 gives you a wider angle of view compared to something like the Fujifilm X100V, as well as packing a much larger sensor. As a result, it’s better suited to low-light photography, and when you’re shooting at night, during winter, or on London’s Underground, that extra bit of image quality can make a difference. The ability to switch over so rapidly from autofocus to manual is also of great use to street photographers.

If I were to invest in a Leica, the Q would probably be my choice: it’s compact and combines the sleek, classic design with excellent glass and that full frame sensor. The Fujifilm X100V will save you a serious amount of money, and there’s no tilting screen, but of course, the experience probably isn’t quite the same.

Is the Leica Q your street photography camera of choice? Let us know in the comments below.

Andy Day's picture

Andy Day is a British photographer and writer living in France. He began photographing parkour in 2003 and has been doing weird things in the city and elsewhere ever since. He's addicted to climbing and owns a fairly useless dog. He has an MA in Sociology & Photography which often makes him ponder what all of this really means.

Log in or register to post comments
1 Comment

I'm not into street photography, but I own the old Leica Q, and it's perfect for walks in forests, doing wide angle flower close ups, and street/architecture on the fly. Owned the Fuji X100F before, and will not return to the x100V. Bought my Leica second hand when guys where jumping on the Q2 train, even then the price is higher than Fuji's, but ... you pay for a near perfect lens, on a quite good and elegant body. Can't complain.

Ok, manual focusing is better on the Q2, as on the Q you can only focus manually in the center, otherwise you have to focus and turn/recompose like in good old times.