Did Hasselblad Take Inspiration From Leica for Its Latest Lenses and X2D Camera?

Did Hasselblad Take Inspiration From Leica for Its Latest Lenses and X2D Camera?

Hasselblad recently announced its latest camera, the X2D 100C, along with several new lenses. What's interesting is that Hasselblad has used certain design features in its latest lenses that are arguably reminiscent of another well-known company on the market, which is, of course, Leica.

Hasselblad has announced a new camera, the X2D 100C. This camera follows on from the original X1D series of cameras and comes with some major updates. Many of these updates can be attributed to the sensor in the new camera. This new sensor features 100 megapixels of resolution, 16-bit raw files, phase detect autofocus, and 15 stops of dynamic range.

This sensor is not new to the market because it's the same one that can be found in the Fujifilm GFX 100 series of cameras. Hasselblad has made some changes to accommodate its own style. 

For instance, the Hasselblad Natural Color Solution is well regarded as one of the best on the market. Colors are, of course, incredibly important — potentially more important than most other technical features. 

Additionally, Hasselblad announced three new lenses with focal lengths of 55mm, 38mm, and 90mm. All of these new lenses have an aperture of f/2.5. The design of these lenses is noticeably different from current XCD lenses and virtually all previous Hasselblad lenses too. It's this change that seems to have caught the attention of many. 

No Video Features

Hasselblad was the first company to produce a medium format camera that shot 4K video using the full width of the sensor. The Hasselblad H6D 100C managed to shoot raw video using the whole sensor, and this is with its massive 645 sensor. At the time, this was quite a feat. The camera was released all the way back in 2016 when 4K video was still just a curiosity for many creators. 

Over the years, Hasselblad continued to produce cameras that offered video features. However, the latest camera from the company includes no video features. 

Hasselblad even went far enough to declare that it has no plans to add this function to its camera either. Some may find this disappointing. However, it could be argued that this is the right move for Hasselblad. 

Video features in these cameras make little to no sense. Virtually no one that is serious about shooting video would pick a Hasselblad camera. Price comparisons with other potential options aside, the camera systems are simply not designed with video shooters in mind. 

Focusing, for instance, is a challenge with these cameras, both with manual and autofocus. It's simply not worth the effort because the results would end up suffering. It's commendable that Hasselblad tried to implement this feature, however, it's better to see that the company is self-aware enough to get rid of features that were clogging up its camera. 

Another company that did the same was Leica with its M series cameras. Leica decided to remove video features in the Leica M10 and has continued without it in its latest camera too, the Leica M11. Some Leica fans did express disappointment, but the overall sentiment seemed to be positive. It's likely this will also be the case for Hasselblad and we may see a little discontent. However, most people will probably appreciate the more focused approach from the company. 

Hasselblad and Leica produce niche, high-end cameras that specialize in specific areas. It makes sense that Hasselblad would follow suit and remove video features from its latest camera. 

The Lens Design

It's difficult to look at the latest lenses from Hasselblad and not think of Leica. The new 38mm, 55mm, and 90mm V lenses have a design that is drastically different from every other XCD lens. In fact, the new lenses don't even fit the design guidelines of any previous Hasselblad lenses, such as those designed for the H-mount system.

The lenses are supposedly taking inspiration from the much loved Hasselblad V-mount system of old. The problem is that if you look at most (if not all) of the V Mount Carl Zeiss lenses, they're different enough in design. The new V lenses from Hasselblad have certain design elements that seem to have been taken directly from Leica M series lenses. 

Obviously, the key change from previous XCD lenses is that the new lenses have larger text on them along with focus and aperture markings. V mount lenses also included this information; however, it's more about the style and less about its addition. Very few manufacturers use this particular style. The only other lens manufacturers that use similar designs are Zeiss and Voigtlander. Of course, Voigtlander produces lenses for M series cameras, so it makes sense for them to use the same style. 

The design on the older V-mount lenses was different enough for it to not be mistaken for anything else. Nonetheless, this is not a bad thing by any means. If anything this is an improvement and a welcome change. The extra information on the lens is probably going to end up being useful for photographers. 

In any case, it's interesting to see how Hasselblad is changing its strategy. 

The Problem That Is Fujifilm 

Fujifilm has been utilizing the 100-megapixel sensor in the new Hasselblad camera for several years. Since 2018, when the original Fujifilm GFX 100 was announced, Fujifilm has carefully cultivated a customer base that swears by its cameras and lenses. Fujifilm managed this by throwing absolutely everything it could at its GFX 100 series of cameras. 

Fujifilm then went on to produce the GFX 100S, a smaller and substantially less expensive camera that doesn't compromise on anything meaningful. Due to this, it's not going to be easy for Hasselblad to compete, although some of the latest changes might be enough. 

Instead of trying to attract general working professionals, Hasselblad may be trying to do what Leica does. Leica M series cameras are less "professional" and more luxurious. Although some may vehemently disagree, this is pretty clear based on the strategy that Leica implements and even based on the marketing firms that Leica works with. 

By producing a camera system that isn't trying to do everything, Hasselblad may be able to differentiate itself in the market. Removing features such as video, not focusing on high-speed photography or high frame rates, and putting a huge emphasis on design might end up working extremely well for the company. These are things that Leica does really well, and these latest updates might be exactly what Hasselblad needs for its XCD camera system. 

Final Thoughts

Leica is one of the oldest camera manufacturers in the world. Depending on your definitions, Leica can even be described as the oldest camera manufacturer on the market. Almost everyone in the photography industry has taken some kind of inspiration from Leica. If Hasselblad has taken a page from Leica, then it's nothing new. 

Leica has influenced almost every manufacturer on the market, including Fujifilm. The X100 series of cameras is sure to remind you of a Leica camera. Having said that, Leica has also been influenced by other camera manufacturers too. Essentially, there's absolutely nothing wrong with taking inspiration. It's something we do as creatives and artists, and it's great to see manufacturers doing the same to produce interesting and useful products. 

The latest camera and lenses from Hasselblad can be preordered by using this link here

Log in or register to post comments
6 Comments
Wolf Nitch's picture

The one and only thing that excites me about the Hasselblad is that it has no video function. Removes all the clutter you don't need as a Medium Format pro photographer. If you needed Video you simply would have a camera geared up for that.

I think Fujifilm should have a less cluttered 100s body only for photography ...

Generally having more body options would be my preference going forward. I honestly don't see how more and more MP is really all that useful. With IBIS and lens stabilisers and AF being so incredible... what else do we really need.

The individual bodies for different photographic needs strategy is exactly what Fujifilm did it for the X system - and it was an incredible success... everyone else should create individualised bodies ... Why doesn't Sony have an X-Pro, why doesn't Canon create an XT4, why doesn't Nikon create Manual only tiny lenses...

I totally would buy a different set of bodies - even manual lenses - for different needs. A Fuji GFX100s as a workhorse. A GFX50rii (with hybrid viewfinder, without video, and great built quality) as a street camera and one that is just with me all the time... another more video-focused camera for film making.

Zapped Beetlebush's picture

Take a look at Hasselblads lenses from the 1980’s. That’s were the inspiration is coming from. Black metal, orange accents. They even give you a clue in the name for the series - “V”, which is what Hasselblad sometimes calls their older system that preceded the H system.

Reggie Hughey's picture

I feel as though I’m the only photographer in the wilderness who doesn’t want or need “video” on my camera. Video for me is useless, as I’m not and probably will never be, a video shooter. (I simply cannot worship 2 gods: the video god and the still god). Thank you Hassy for not adding video to the camera, and further inflating the price.

ioas 12's picture

You are not alone in this at all, at least I feel exactly the same.

ioas 12's picture

My only concern is that with this new 100MP sensor each pixel becomes smaller and captures less light. The X1DII output is simply magical because of how it renders light and how many subtle colour variations it captures - thanks to its huge pixels. Will the 100MP improve on that or will it trade this rendering for more detail, how it happened with Canon and R5?

Usman Dawood's picture

That used to be a problem but upto 150mp (on a full-frame medium format camera) it seems technology has moved beyond a point where it makes a difference.

This is especially the case with BSI sensors making them highly capable with light. If anything, these new sensors with smaller pixels are better than older sensors with larger pixels.