Are Telephoto Lenses Creating Fake News of People Ignoring Social Distancing?

With people’s tolerance of confinement starting to strain, the media has been paying close attention to crowds seemingly violating social distancing advice, with photographs taken using telephoto lenses potentially misrepresenting the density of people at certain locations. Deliberate or not, are camera lenses creating fake news?

The issue flared in the British media last week when tabloid newspapers were accused of manufacturing outrage by deliberately publishing photographs that were shot using telephoto lenses. As this Twitter thread explains, a photograph showed a densely packed boulevard, suggesting that government advice was being ignored. Closer examination, it is argued, suggests that the 40 people were in fact spread out across almost half a mile.

In the U.S., a photograph published by the O.C. Register suggested that the beach in San Clemente was packed with sun-seekers, all blissfully ignoring social distancing:

The image in full can be seen here. Five days later, this photograph led California Governor Gavin Newsom to close all of the beaches in Orange County which in turn prompted crowds to gather to protest against the order. Newsom was later accused of making decisions in response to a misleading photograph rather than actual data.

The O.C. Register later published the metadata from the controversial image in response to suggestions that it was not taken when it was claimed or had been manipulated. The EXIF data shows that it was shot at a focal length of 380mm on a Nikon D5.

Lens compression at 380mm is very noticeable, as detailed in this Fstoppers article from a few years ago, and discussed in the KTLA segment shown above. Here’s the gif mentioned by presenter Andy Riesmeyer:

The contrast with the helicopter footage is stark, though, as the presenters note, it's impossible to make a genuine comparison without having more information.

https://twitter.com/NBCLA/status/1254184442790391809

The response from O.C. Register makes for some interesting reading. While the question of whether people should be congregating in any numbers will no doubt draw impassioned debate, it's fascinating to see how a straight news photo has the potential to mislead, reminding us that fake news is not necessarily politically driven, and can be highly complex. Certainly, none of this is helped by the fact that, despite the best intentions, advice and regulations in response to the global pandemic can seem inconsistent, unenforceable, and illogical.

Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Andy Day's picture

Andy Day is a British photographer and writer living in France. He began photographing parkour in 2003 and has been doing weird things in the city and elsewhere ever since. He's addicted to climbing and owns a fairly useless dog. He has an MA in Sociology & Photography which often makes him ponder what all of this really means.

Log in or register to post comments
87 Comments
Previous comments

I assume English is your second language; or is it a lack of education thing.

Anyway, I'm utterly bored of you now.

English is my language. Im not good at typing on a computer, but Im getting better.
I worked for over 40 years and didnt go to college but I am always open to learning more and Im not so insecure like you to be cruel to others about schooling. That's very nasty and you are a mean person.

I'm sorry for the sadness and problems that brought you here to be so snippy and no good. I hope you get better for your own sake: it's sad to see people wasting away with anger for no reason.

Also I see you are still negative voting me and I am not being negative to you so please stop it. Thanks!

Why are you bored? Why would you say that? We are talking and that is rude to say. Get manners please.

You bore me because you are stupid, ignorant, or a combination thereof.

Name calling is not necessary. Why are you so mean and angry? Why are you offending me so much? It doesnt hurt me when people call me names, because I learned a long time ago that the person calling you names is hurting inside and they are a insecure bully when they do that. It speaks more to how you feel about yourself that what nastiness you throw at me.

Please respond nicely! Thanks!

That's the spirit! You mewling quim.

Thank you! See, you can be nice!

Whats a quim?

Wait I googled it. That's still nasty: its vulgar. Please try another word to be nice. Thanks!

Wow, you are stupid. By all means, keep going.

With what?

Also what is 'decerves'? You said the US gets what it decerves? I looked it up but Google said I misspelled deserves. Is that what you meant?

I forgive you if you misspelled and I wouldn't presume your lack of education like you did to me. See how that works? Not being mean?

Yeah, you're a moron who held down a job for 40 years and who views that as evidence of intellect.

I think you need to reread what I wrote. I did not say I am an intellectual (but I do respect them!). I told you my job because I did not unfortunately have time for college education. But I said I am always open to learning new things.

Why am I a moron to you? You don't know me personally. Why resort to this? Such an angry person: shame

This is a lot like bullying the retarded kid.

If you think you are bullying a slow child, what does that say about you?

Think about that when you go back to school in Sept.

Oh, princess, I have four degrees and numerous professional qualifications. I feel no need for more.

Wow! That's great. It takes a lot of hard work and dedication to earn degrees. I'm sorry: I thought you were younger because of how you were acting.

What are your degrees in?

How about this; stick to photography and stay away from politics; you do not have the constitution for it.

No thank you. I will talk about what I want.

What is more important is that you learn to be less angry and nasty in the future. Please try. You will be happier if you do!

Then STFU and deal with the consequences, mewling quim.

Shut up about what exactly? Please watch your language.

You cannot seriously be this obtuse. You simply cannot.

Did you answer me about your degrees? I don't see it yet. What are they in? Congratulations!

You seemed to stop being so nasty and writing so much and so fast to me when I brought up your degrees. Sorry: I dont me to upset you if you are insecure about them. But you shouldn;t be: they are impressive!

I look forward to hearing about them when you get the courage back to answer. What are they in? All 4 please...

I was busy taking photos.

Aerospace Engineering
Science (physics, math)
Psychology
Law

Now kindly piss off; I have had enough of corresponding with someone who appears to have a room temperature IQ.

Oh my goodness how impressive! Your mom must be very proud! Are those all doctors?!

But she’d be very embarrassed of her intelligent son being so bratty and cruel online. Resorting to such nasty tactics doesn’t impress anybody, and you could be very impressive.

You may be very smart, but you still have a lot to learn about being a good man.

I hope you find the ability to be humble and happy!

With love,
Alfie

I wasn't trying to impress you, idiot. And it's *doctorate*.

Well you did impress me! But it’s more important if your mom is impressed and proud. Make her proud by not throwing out such anger.

Are they all doctorates then?

Hey! How about both of you calm down please. You appear to have different veiws, and that is fine. That is what makes America great. Blake, you don't need to be a jerk. Alfie, you don't have to keep pushing it when he doesn't want to talk. This is supposed to be about photogrpahy, not having arguments about....I don't even know what this is about. Also, Blake, it is fine if Alfie wants more positivity, I respect that. Alfie, no need to insult him about being a good man. You don't have any clue what his situation is. Y'all just chill. Please.

You’re right Im sorry. I get too clingy sometimes. Don’t know how this works on the web yet!

Dr. Blake is deleted now which is sad. I hope he gets more positive in the future. Thanks for the comment, Mr. Haddock! I will do better in the future!

With love,
Alfie

Next time just let it rest. Then everyone will be happy! :)

Thats all I want is for everyone to be happy!

How about we just sit and see how many people die and in what locations; personally, I read comments such as those in this comment thread and experience considerable schadenfreude.

We (collectively) make our choices.

Mr. Blake you need to find something to make you happy inside and our so you dont take please in other's misfortunes (I Googled the ' schadenfreude').

I hope you do. I will pray for you to not be so snippy and nasty like a baby without a mom. Maybe you'll grow up. I hope so!

"I will pray for you..."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Piss off with your passive agressive bullshit. You don't even have the spine to be open about it.

Pathetic.

What do you mean? How am I being aggressive? I am true and sincere: I will pray for you Mr. Blake tonight before sleep.

Watch the language too, please.

We have been exaggerating elements with a telephoto lens in broadcast news ..... well, forever. It is typical for sports broadcasters to use a telephone lens to make it seem that football players are right next to each other (about to get sacked) for added drama, telephoto shots of blowing palms to make the hurricane seem more forceful, etc. Drama in the shot means attention of the viewer, which is good for business.

The real fake is the understanding of news is on the viewing end. Everyone has a point of view. The editor's view counts a little more in all media. The political leanings of newspapers in the United States use to be published in a directory. It is a Constitutionally protected business run by humans, owned by humans, and sometimes it is a willing extension of the government in the creation of policy. Sometimes the policies are good sometimes they are not. Who knows at this point with COVID-19.